HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1301  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2014, 3:52 AM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBigStuff View Post
Does 08 - 26 now no longer have weight restrictions - as it has in the past???
If not - did this change when the numbers were changed???

I'm on the understanding that a B737-200 weighs about 51 tons.
I'm of the understanding that it was always weight restricted for departures, likely for noise purposes (< 44,100 lbs). During the windstorm of a few years ago, I was working arrival and had an MD-83, A320, and plenty of 737's land on 26 (then 25). I remember Lufthansa's A343 being offered 25 as well but he instead opted for 28. The rest is YouTube history. The largest plane I heard of landing on 25 was either a super DC-8 or DC-10. I think a 767 already has, too. Remember, it was one of McCall field's original pieces of pavement so it was probably stressed for lots of heavy-ish traffic.


Besides, 26 is now the widest available taxiway at the airport. They'll need to find a letter with which to designate it...
     
     
  #1302  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2014, 12:53 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyeg66 View Post
I'm of the understanding that it was always weight restricted for departures, likely for noise purposes (< 44,100 lbs). During the windstorm of a few years ago, I was working arrival and had an MD-83, A320, and plenty of 737's land on 26 (then 25). I remember Lufthansa's A343 being offered 25 as well but he instead opted for 28. The rest is YouTube history. The largest plane I heard of landing on 25 was either a super DC-8 or DC-10. I think a 767 already has, too. Remember, it was one of McCall field's original pieces of pavement so it was probably stressed for lots of heavy-ish traffic.


Besides, 26 is now the widest available taxiway at the airport. They'll need to find a letter with which to designate it...
11/27 never forget:

Video Link


I ripped up to work that day because I was worried we'd be losing plywood all over the yard, good thing the majority was strapped/weighted down. Only a few sheets got loose. I could look over across McCall lake and see the airliners landing on 25, was crazy to see.

Last edited by Bigtime; Jul 15, 2014 at 1:15 PM.
     
     
  #1303  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2014, 1:14 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Hey Nick/cyeg66, on the OIS page what does it mean when the details say MIDS/Noise?

I'm assuming Noise has to do with noise abatement procedures, just not sure on MIDS.
     
     
  #1304  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2014, 4:34 PM
Nick's Avatar
Nick Nick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CYYC
Posts: 437
I'd imagine it would be short for Midnight operation, which we usually land 29, depart 35L. MIDS is a Nav Canada system, but it's not used by ATC, but by FSS. So I don't imagine that's what they mean.
     
     
  #1305  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2014, 4:47 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Thank you Nick, makes sense as that detail was dropped from the display shortly after 7am.

On another note word is that ACA1159 (YYZ-YYC) today will be subbed in with a 788:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/ACA1159
     
     
  #1306  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2014, 10:30 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,302
787 landing in about 10-20 mins. Lucky Cowgarians.... YUL made a big testicle, er, I mean spectacle of the 787 landing there yesterday or the day before... Pfft! Big deal.
     
     
  #1307  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 1:33 AM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Her wings are unmistakable, via @YYCSpotter.

     
     
  #1308  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 4:02 PM
Robag Robag is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Regina
Posts: 301
Thought you guys might be interested in this video:
http://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=399861
     
     
  #1309  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 4:56 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Cathay Pacific is starting 747-800 Freighter service October 17th!

http://www.aircargoworld.com/Air-Cargo-W...ay-begins-calgary-freighter-service/6639
     
     
  #1310  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 5:00 PM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Cathay Pacific is starting 747-800 Freighter service October 17th!

http://www.aircargoworld.com/Air-Cargo-W...ay-begins-calgary-freighter-service/6639
Longtime coming!

Since Asiana Cargo pulled out that has been a void for Asia cargo service.

Routing is, Hong Kong-Anchorage-New York (JFK)-Calgary-Hong Kong (Tuesdays) and Hong Kong-Anchorage-New York (JFK)-Columbus-Calgary-Hong Kong (Fridays). No times listed yet that I can find.
     
     
  #1311  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 5:02 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Indeed! I wonder what time arrival/departure will be?
     
     
  #1312  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 5:09 PM
Full Mountain's Avatar
Full Mountain Full Mountain is offline
YIMBY
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuffyy View Post
Longtime coming!

Since Asiana Cargo pulled out that has been a void for Asia cargo service.

Routing is, Hong Kong-Anchorage-New York (JFK)-Calgary-Hong Kong (Tuesdays) and Hong Kong-Anchorage-New York (JFK)-Columbus-Calgary-Hong Kong (Fridays). No times listed yet that I can find.
Is Anchorage just a tech stop? Does the 748 not have long enough legs to make Hong Kong-New York, I thought it would have.
__________________
Incremental Photo - @PhotogX_1

Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are my own not those of any affiliated organizations.
     
     
  #1313  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 5:12 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Don't think even the 7478F can make a JFK-HKG fully loaded, and in the world of air cargo I'm guessing they'd rather make stops than have non 100% cargo capacity loaded up.
     
     
  #1314  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 5:19 PM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Don't think even the 7478F can make a JFK-HKG fully loaded, and in the world of air cargo I'm guessing they'd rather make stops than have non 100% cargo capacity loaded up.
ANC is a huge cargo hub as many carriers fly cargo into ANC and feed the Asian freighters.

Its not uncommon to see 10 747F's of various models parked at ANC loading and unloading at once, in addition to MD-11F's, 777F's etc...

Most International cargo routes are now multi stop as Bigtime said to ensure full(er) loads, Some carriers even do ''around the world'' cargo flights.
     
     
  #1315  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 5:20 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Yup, kind of cool though that the YYC sector will always be non-stop to HKG (at least for now). I'm guessing that bird will eat up a lot of runway as a result.
     
     
  #1316  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 5:27 PM
Full Mountain's Avatar
Full Mountain Full Mountain is offline
YIMBY
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Don't think even the 7478F can make a JFK-HKG fully loaded, and in the world of air cargo I'm guessing they'd rather make stops than have non 100% cargo capacity loaded up.
Interesting, according to this, looks to be about 50 tonnes less to do the full run. Looks like much more than 4,400nmi (i.e. Hong Kong Anchorage) the capacity starts to drop.
__________________
Incremental Photo - @PhotogX_1

Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are my own not those of any affiliated organizations.
     
     
  #1317  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 5:33 PM
Full Mountain's Avatar
Full Mountain Full Mountain is offline
YIMBY
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuffyy View Post
ANC is a huge cargo hub as many carriers fly cargo into ANC and feed the Asian freighters.

Its not uncommon to see 10 747F's of various models parked at ANC loading and unloading at once, in addition to MD-11F's, 777F's etc...

Most International cargo routes are now multi stop as Bigtime said to ensure full(er) loads, Some carriers even do ''around the world'' cargo flights.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Yup, kind of cool though that the YYC sector will always be non-stop to HKG (at least for now). I'm guessing that bird will eat up a lot of runway as a result.
Looks like they'll be weight limited out of YYC to get the range. Probably ~20 tonnes under max
__________________
Incremental Photo - @PhotogX_1

Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are my own not those of any affiliated organizations.
     
     
  #1318  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 5:34 PM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
Hong Kong is also a much more desirable link for Cargo compared to Tokyo with a larger inbound/outbound tonnage for feed and its the worlds largest (for tonnage) cargo hub having handled over 4 million tonnes in the last 12 months.

This should stick around when compared to Asiana's Seoul flight simply for the amount of ''Freight connections'' it will offer.
     
     
  #1319  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 5:49 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Mountain View Post
Looks like they'll be weight limited out of YYC to get the range. Probably ~20 tonnes under max
Cargo traffic is primarily eastward bound with about 1/2 as much demand going west. YYC-HKG should be okay with the weight restriction (e.g. the restriction will only eat into excess supply and not leave cargo on the dock).
     
     
  #1320  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 6:21 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Cathay Pacific is starting 747-800 Freighter service October 17th!
Does this count as YYC nonstop service to mainland China???
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:42 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.