HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #341  
Old Posted May 16, 2014, 10:07 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drofmab View Post
I may be skeptical of the GTH, but autonomy was a wise strategic move. It is one of their key advantages over something like Centrepoint Canada.
Just for Clarification purposes:

Centre Point is a hotel/condominium complex under construction in downtown Winnipeg.

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=197745


Centreport Canada (WPG) is the Inland Port/FTZ I assume you are referring to under construction in the NW area of Winnipeg.

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=157955
__________________
♥ ♥
     
     
  #342  
Old Posted May 16, 2014, 11:24 PM
Drofmab's Avatar
Drofmab Drofmab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 1,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro View Post
Just for Clarification purposes:

Centre Point is a hotel/condominium...

Centreport Canada (WPG) is the Inland Port/FTZ I assume you are referring to under construction in the NW area of Winnipeg.
LOL - yep, just a typo Thanks.
     
     
  #343  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 4:58 AM
TannerF TannerF is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 115
It appears that Dundee is going to be moving dirt on the section West of Harbour landing this year. A guy I do custom work for was informed that he wont be able to farm his entire quarter this year. I haven't got a chance to see the map they gave him to know what exactly is going on.
     
     
  #344  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 5:28 AM
UrbanClimate's Avatar
UrbanClimate UrbanClimate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 397
New U of R sign

New U of R sign is hard to miss



REGINA — The University of Regina entered a new era on Friday as it unveiled a new “marquee gateway sign” at its busiest intersection.

Dave Button, U of R vice-president (administration), was proud to unveil the project, which he says improves safety and accessibility to the university.

Gone is the inconspicuous beige-and-brown sign with little block letters. In its place is a $378,000 behemoth of recycled stainless-steel type on a Manitoba Tyndall-stone base.

The sign is just one part of Phase 1 of the Gateway Project. The $950,000 renewal project also includes landscaping, tree relocation, new lighting and widened pathways to replace the cracked 50-year-old sidewalks that led to the campus.

The northeast corner of Wascana Parkway and Kramer Boulevard sees a lot of pedestrian traffic — an estimated 250 people per hour. More than 25,000 cars pass through the intersection each day.

Resodding is all that’s left for Phase 1 of the Gateway Project. Subsequent phases involve a $100,000 project to renew signage around campus, and giving specific street addresses to the buildings.

http://www.leaderpost.com/news/regina/sign+hard+miss/9848146/story.html
     
     
  #345  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 2:09 PM
TannerF TannerF is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 115
Wascana Village still trying to go forward

http://www.leaderpost.com/touch/news/reg...y+protests/9848197/story.html?rel=815153

REGINA — An agreement signed by the Rural Municipality of Sherwood, a First Nation and a corporation brings a new community southeast of Regina one step closer to fruition — despite political “mumbo jumbo” that has stalled the process for nearly a year.

“I can’t see it not happening,” said Daniel Schmid, president of the Great Prairie Development Corporation, adding that his company has never faced the kind of frustrating confusion that it has with this project.

Plans for Wascana Village, a proposed 736-acre, 14,000-resident community, has been progressing at a snail’s pace, largely due to the tense negotiations and political jousting between the City of Regina and the RM of Sherwood.

The company is currently waiting for the province to issue a finalized rezoning approval, which has butted up against some issues — something Regina Mayor Michael Fougere is quick to point out.

The developer is having to construct its own waste water treatment plant and prove it can supply safe water to the community. Regina refuses to service the area.

“Our position has been known for a long time that we are not supportive of that development,” said Fougere.

Even with its rejection of the idea, Great Prairie is still hoping the city will collaborate.

“We always are willing to work with the City of Regina,” said Schmid. “So far we haven’t had the opportunity to do that. We’ve invited them in for discussions.”

Almost exactly one year ago, the proposal for Wascana Village and Sherwood’s official community plan created a rift between the rural municipality and the City of Regina. The two governments were at odds over competing growth strategies. The city wanted to annex land for future expansion and desired a say in Sherwood’s urban-fringe development ambitions; the rural municipality refused to let the city stomp on its own ideas for growth.

The two signed a memorandum of understanding in November, which left the land for Wascana Village free for the RM of Sherwood to develop. But that doesn’t mean Regina is OK with a community the population of Swift Current popping up near its border.

“It would have a significant impact on our services, our streets, our infrastructure, our schools, our recreation areas,” said Fougere.

On Friday, though, the talk of significant impact was a positive one, when three groups agreed to build up the area south of Regina along a common understanding of “healthy development.”

“This is part of building our First Nation toward self-sufficiency and self-determination,” said Chief Lynn Acoose of Sakimay First Nation, which has also faced trouble aligning its development plans with those of the City of Regina.

Thanks to this agreement, Great Prairie will develop 800 acres of Sakimay land east of the proposed Wascana Village. Sakimay will also benefit from the new water services, and jobs promised to First Nation members through the development company.

The agreement also details how the development of the area will follow principles important to Sakimay, such as environmental sustainability and walkability.

“We don’t want to develop our lands in the kinds of models that are out there. The conventional development model doesn’t work for our purposes,” said Acoose. “We want to put people first.”
     
     
  #346  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 3:00 PM
jw6969 jw6969 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by TannerF View Post
Wascana Village still trying to go forward

http://www.leaderpost.com/touch/news/reg...y+protests/9848197/story.html?rel=815153

REGINA — An agreement signed by the Rural Municipality of Sherwood, a First Nation and a corporation brings a new community southeast of Regina one step closer to fruition — despite political “mumbo jumbo” that has stalled the process for nearly a year.

“I can’t see it not happening,” said Daniel Schmid, president of the Great Prairie Development Corporation, adding that his company has never faced the kind of frustrating confusion that it has with this project.

Plans for Wascana Village, a proposed 736-acre, 14,000-resident community, has been progressing at a snail’s pace, largely due to the tense negotiations and political jousting between the City of Regina and the RM of Sherwood.

The company is currently waiting for the province to issue a finalized rezoning approval, which has butted up against some issues — something Regina Mayor Michael Fougere is quick to point out.

The developer is having to construct its own waste water treatment plant and prove it can supply safe water to the community. Regina refuses to service the area.

“Our position has been known for a long time that we are not supportive of that development,” said Fougere.

Even with its rejection of the idea, Great Prairie is still hoping the city will collaborate.

“We always are willing to work with the City of Regina,” said Schmid. “So far we haven’t had the opportunity to do that. We’ve invited them in for discussions.”

Almost exactly one year ago, the proposal for Wascana Village and Sherwood’s official community plan created a rift between the rural municipality and the City of Regina. The two governments were at odds over competing growth strategies. The city wanted to annex land for future expansion and desired a say in Sherwood’s urban-fringe development ambitions; the rural municipality refused to let the city stomp on its own ideas for growth.

The two signed a memorandum of understanding in November, which left the land for Wascana Village free for the RM of Sherwood to develop. But that doesn’t mean Regina is OK with a community the population of Swift Current popping up near its border.

“It would have a significant impact on our services, our streets, our infrastructure, our schools, our recreation areas,” said Fougere.

On Friday, though, the talk of significant impact was a positive one, when three groups agreed to build up the area south of Regina along a common understanding of “healthy development.”

“This is part of building our First Nation toward self-sufficiency and self-determination,” said Chief Lynn Acoose of Sakimay First Nation, which has also faced trouble aligning its development plans with those of the City of Regina.

Thanks to this agreement, Great Prairie will develop 800 acres of Sakimay land east of the proposed Wascana Village. Sakimay will also benefit from the new water services, and jobs promised to First Nation members through the development company.

The agreement also details how the development of the area will follow principles important to Sakimay, such as environmental sustainability and walkability.

“We don’t want to develop our lands in the kinds of models that are out there. The conventional development model doesn’t work for our purposes,” said Acoose. “We want to put people first.”

Is this the one that was going to be in the middle of the new bypass.
     
     
  #347  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 4:09 PM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
`

Last edited by thefourthtower; Jun 12, 2014 at 6:29 PM.
     
     
  #348  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 4:22 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by TannerF View Post
It appears that Dundee is going to be moving dirt on the section West of Harbour landing this year. A guy I do custom work for was informed that he wont be able to farm his entire quarter this year. I haven't got a chance to see the map they gave him to know what exactly is going on.
Last summer, there were crews already digging/trenching west of Campbell St.
     
     
  #349  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 9:21 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefourthtower View Post
With the high cost of construction Capital Pointe will never be built , and possibly any other high rise for a few years in saskatchewan , so FCC. May be the last tower for a while , one of the only way these high profile projects will get built is if the govt steps in , eg.the 1,2 billion dollar bypass or the 300 million stadium , it would be nice if the Harvard developments put up a few condo high rises
............ and gone are the days of the late '70s/throughout the '80s when buildings were constructed willy nilly. The final bill for city hall was $10 million. Inflation (or not) it was still cheaper then to construct highrises as compared to now.
     
     
  #350  
Old Posted May 17, 2014, 10:46 PM
Drofmab's Avatar
Drofmab Drofmab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 1,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
............ and gone are the days of the late '70s/throughout the '80s when buildings were constructed willy nilly. The final bill for city hall was $10 million. Inflation (or not) it was still cheaper then to construct highrises as compared to now.
Yup: $10.1 million in 1976 is equivalent to $41.2million in 2014 dollars.
(using Bank of Canada inflation calculator)
     
     
  #351  
Old Posted May 18, 2014, 4:57 AM
BrutallyDishonest BrutallyDishonest is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by TannerF View Post
It appears that Dundee is going to be moving dirt on the section West of Harbour landing this year. A guy I do custom work for was informed that he wont be able to farm his entire quarter this year. I haven't got a chance to see the map they gave him to know what exactly is going on.
You mean Dream!
     
     
  #352  
Old Posted May 18, 2014, 4:41 PM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
`

Last edited by thefourthtower; Jun 12, 2014 at 6:30 PM.
     
     
  #353  
Old Posted May 18, 2014, 4:46 PM
babo's Avatar
babo babo is offline
Regina rhymes with fun!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: I don't like elevators.
Posts: 361
Maybe SGI will be "off-shored" to Asia.
     
     
  #354  
Old Posted May 18, 2014, 5:30 PM
Festivus Festivus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefourthtower View Post
Maybe just maybe the government has set a dangerous trend here regarding the SGI. Tower telling the country that it is to costly to build in Saskatchewan , not really a good move on there part , if they can't afford to build who can .
You act like it's the message that is the problem, and not the reality. The government saying it's too expensive doesn't do damage...the prices being too high does damage.
     
     
  #355  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 2:37 PM
jvj jvj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Regina
Posts: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crisis View Post
Hmm...a few questions come to mind.
Considering they had all of the numbers in January, why did it take until mid-May for them to decide that the costs were too high?
And related to that, what makes them think that delaying or coming up with alternative measures is going to end up with a better financial result?
And of course, what are the chances that the best proposal might not have come from the 2 local favorites (Harvard and Brandt)...and they were wondering how they could make an award to an out of province developer palatable? I can't say for sure that's what happened, but it's possible...both those 2 have high profiles and strong relationships locally, and both would have been lobbying very hard to keep the project in "local" hands. Just a thought.
     
     
  #356  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 3:05 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by jvj View Post
Hmm...a few questions come to mind.
Considering they had all of the numbers in January, why did it take until mid-May for them to decide that the costs were too high?
And related to that, what makes them think that delaying or coming up with alternative measures is going to end up with a better financial result?
And of course, what are the chances that the best proposal might not have come from the 2 local favorites (Harvard and Brandt)...and they were wondering how they could make an award to an out of province developer palatable? I can't say for sure that's what happened, but it's possible...both those 2 have high profiles and strong relationships locally, and both would have been lobbying very hard to keep the project in "local" hands. Just a thought.
From the government press release:
"An engineer’s report confirms the current building is structurally sound and safe. There are some infrastructure and maintenance concerns that will need to be addressed at some point, but they are not safety-related. There are no plans for an extensive renovation of the building."


Possible explanation for the delay:
Given the higher than expected net cost (spread between new build and salvage value of old building) an engineers assessment on the building's safety would have been required before deciding to simply go with the status quo.

Sometimes things are just as they are stated in the press release (not always, but sometimes).
     
     
  #357  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 5:32 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
From the government press release:
"An engineer’s report confirms the current building is structurally sound and safe. There are some infrastructure and maintenance concerns that will need to be addressed at some point, but they are not safety-related. There are no plans for an extensive renovation of the building."


Possible explanation for the delay:
Given the higher than expected net cost (spread between new build and salvage value of old building) an engineers assessment on the building's safety would have been required before deciding to simply go with the status quo.

Sometimes things are just as they are stated in the press release (not always, but sometimes).
There will be an election this year. (That would be as to why for no new SGI building.)
     
     
  #358  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 6:26 PM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
There will be an election this year. (That would be as to why for no new SGI building.)
The Saskatchewan election is supposed to be in Nov of 2015, but due to overlap with the Federal election, the laws allow it to shift into April of 2016.

That said, the election period would still overlap with the planning/construction of said building, so they probably want to avoid any overlap at all... Better to do it right at the start of the next mandate (if they are going to go that route).

Assuming they don't try to privatize it anyway...
     
     
  #359  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 7:12 PM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,387
Harvard developments will have the ability to build whatever they want during this high construction cost time period. They have the money, that is for sure.
     
     
  #360  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 7:13 PM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,387
Once Agriculture Place is complete I am sure they will be staring their next high-rise project.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:22 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.