Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus
Better article from the Business Journal:
Sounds like they made the right decision.
The Post's headline is just blatantly untrue. Bad journalism.
|
Okay, so we spend big bucks to build BRT, all for that. We're also going to continue to promise big bucks to build a train later. At what point, if not today, does it become okay to "break our promise" and move on? Because that's the inevitability. Or does this continue to weigh down every transit proposal in the metro area for the next generation? Because that is what I am reading. The whole point of this study was to put one of the two to bed. So we kick the can until next year, fine. And we study it again. And again.
All this sounds like to me is terrible politics which guarantees an election loss the next time you try. The northwest corridor is not that important, frankly, they just don't have the votes. In terms of metro area politics, I think the image of RTD dithering for over a decade is far more damaging. Rather than making a bold decision to just change the plan, every year, we get another series of headlines about how RTD can't seem to finish Fastracks as promised. It makes them look incompetent, when they're really not being incompetent, they're just being afraid. I don't see how any agency benefits politically from intentionally looking like they can't deliver.