Quote:
Originally Posted by ajiuO
Full-size fast food places like Carl's Jr. McDonald's absolutely belong in the heart of downtown.. Even huge city such as San Francisco have such places in the heart of downtown... They just shouldn't be in standalone suburban style buildings.. They also shouldn't have drive up windows and parking lots.
I don't think Carl's Jr. needs to go anywhere. that's actually a situation where everyone can win.. They could make a shit load off the land and included a deal where they would be able to lease space in the bottom of the skyscraper.
There's a Burger King right in the Union Square area of San Francisco that's quite a bit bigger than Carl's Jr... It just depends on how it's done... With that said.. Yeah.. The current Carl's Jr. building doesn't really work there.. But it has nothing to do with being full-sized.
|
Key words: "Full Size" meaning parking lots and drive throughs.
I don't mind urban versions of these places(see Denver) at all. There needs to be cheaper-fast food options in a downtown but when you are trying to make and promote a city as green-walkable, a full size parking lot with drive through is just ugly. Fine for burbs but not on State and 2nd.
We've discussed the ownership situation of this and Eye-Sore Burger on this board several times. IMO, owners like this are not in tune with the changing marketplace and should either develop or sell.. Boarding up buildings that need to be comdemned or take a blind eye to the development going on around them should be penalized and regulated.
This is what a downtown fast food model should be:
There is plenty of space on Main, 1st, 2nd and 3rd south for this. The demand is there.