HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8861  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 4:49 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by kool maudit View Post
the problem is building width. look at the three blocks here:



you walk for 200 meters or so and see three things. that's not a high number. something like this, while still residential and quiet, is far more varied from a pedestrian standpoint:



many people are concerned about building height, but it is building width that deadens cities.
This can't be emphasized enough. That's why I'm very much against consolidating parcels of land to create big podiums.
     
     
  #8862  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 5:01 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
This can't be emphasized enough. That's why I'm very much against consolidating parcels of land to create big podiums.
Yeah, brilliant point.

Upon reflection, it applies to all of the buildings I hate or am uneasy about in the Downtown.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
     
     
  #8863  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 5:46 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,074
     
     
  #8864  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 5:53 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,074
     
     
  #8865  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 5:56 PM
P Unit P Unit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Danforth
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Mtl View Post
This is absolutely fantastic.
     
     
  #8866  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 5:58 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
This can't be emphasized enough. That's why I'm very much against consolidating parcels of land to create big podiums.

That isn't to say that wide buildings are inherently bad though - there are many designs that make good use of wider lots and a certain level of grandeur that would be impossible on something narrower. Achieving the same quality of urban form with wider lots is just a lot more difficult and requires much more careful design considerations - mediocre design just won't do. As is generally the case the more prominent a building becomes. "With great power comes great responsibility" evidently applies as well to buildings as it does to Spider Man.
__________________
     
     
  #8867  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 6:03 PM
niwell's Avatar
niwell niwell is offline
sick transit, gloria
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Roncesvalles, Toronto
Posts: 11,641
^College Park is a good example of that I would say.

I don't actually hate Cityplace. It's a let-down for sure, but it's removed enough from downtown and was never really going to be anything other than residential. That being said, the Lower Donlands is shaping up to be a better example of instant urbanism. The buildings are still pretty wide though - not going to avoid that easily with the fiscal realities of development unfortunately.
     
     
  #8868  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 6:16 PM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Mtl View Post
Kind of reminds me of LA.
     
     
  #8869  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 9:20 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,796
I think any skylines in the distance over city for the whole space between get an LA vibe because LA is most famous for that view. Toronto, Hong Kong, New York, and Chicago all have water for instance. Most other cities like to be up close and personal.
     
     
  #8870  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 9:30 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by P Unit View Post
This is absolutely fantastic.
Agreed. That's amazing!
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
     
     
  #8871  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2014, 4:56 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842

By June Wang on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bg1hvc/
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8872  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2014, 6:22 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
This can't be emphasized enough. That's why I'm very much against consolidating parcels of land to create big podiums.
My god, CityPlace isn't even done yet and it already looks like a slum. That's made even worse that it is being surrounded by equally uninspiring blue glass boxes. You would think the city would have learnt it's lesson with huge look-alike developments with St.James but apparently not.

For a city that says it wants to bring the city closer to it's neighbourhood, it seems to be making sure that the connection between the two will be as sterile as humanly possible.

The only architectural requirements in Toronto these days is that the buildings be as bland as possible, all look the same, and stand up by themselves.
     
     
  #8873  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2014, 7:33 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
The only architectural requirements in Toronto these days is that the buildings be as bland as possible, all look the same, and stand up by themselves.
Well that certainly isn't a gross exaggeration.
     
     
  #8874  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2014, 7:42 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
Is that the new design for the Calgary Tower?
     
     
  #8875  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2014, 7:43 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
Is that the new design for the Calgary Tower? LOL!
     
     
  #8876  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2014, 7:46 AM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415

https://www.flickr.com/photos/empty_quarter/12982571394/



https://www.flickr.com/photos/alexanderadams/13022555175/


In the second photo, note Five Condos going up at the bottom left. It'll end up topping out at 161 metres. The white and red cranes at the bottom right belong to U Condos (184 and 154 metres). Should make for an interesting view in a few months.

Last edited by Ramako; Mar 9, 2014 at 7:57 AM.
     
     
  #8877  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2014, 8:24 AM
suburbanite's Avatar
suburbanite suburbanite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Toronto & NYC
Posts: 5,652
I don't want to be a downer, but I can't be the only one who thinks Toronto from the north is still its worst angle. Too many buildings with a thin profile from Yorkville.
__________________
Discontented suburbanite since 1994
     
     
  #8878  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2014, 8:30 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #8879  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2014, 10:37 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
Downtown Toronto seen from the sky:

     
     
  #8880  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2014, 11:49 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Lots of room to grow!!!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:46 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.