Quote:
Originally Posted by bryantm3
my point is that the city needs to start taking steps to ensure affordable housing is available. 
|
I've thought about this too. I think part of the answer could be Seattle-style micro-apartments, where a single person lives in ~450 SF. Yes, it's tiny, but I've got several friends in this situation: they can't afford to spend $1,000/mo on rent, and they have plenty of friends in the area whose apartments they spend time at. They mainly just want a conveniently-located place to crash, without much in the way of frills. (There ARE definitely options within walking distance of Midtown like this at present, by the way, but they exist marginally and in old structures, exclusively.)
If I were rich, I would start a venture to buy small parcels of land in Midtown, make agreements with nearby existing parking structures to rent blocks of spaces, and develop mini Hong-Kong style highrises with ~10 small units on each floor. Price them at $700-$900. Parking sold
a la carte. No amenities. Just location.
I don't know that I really like government-sponsored affordable housing requirements that subsidize a block of units, or force developers to sell some units at below market rates. They tend to make very little meaningful impact on the housing market.
As for Turner Field, I feel like a government-sponsored redevelopment would end up looking like Lindbergh at best, or more likely like Capitol View (which to me is just bland, unappealing development, despite being better than what was there before). For that sort of development, my fear isn't a lack of affordable housing. I'm worried there will be a lack of housing anyone would be willing to pay market rates for.