Quote:
Originally Posted by Londonee
This is where she's stretching it, the 1900 block of Chestnut street is woefully under-performing. There's something like 8-10 store-front vacancies, an empty lot, a rundown gap outlet. Really, the best thing that block has going for it, is Devil's Alley (they have a heart attack inducing buffalo chicken sandwich smothered in bleu cheese and bacon...that i allow myself to have once a year). She's making it sound like national retailers are beating down the doors, clamoring to open up on this stretch, and that's just patently false. The 1800 block (Boyds-the store) would logically be the next stretch to see some investment--but thus far I cant think of anything new that's going into that block either.
|
Joan Shepp is going in across the street from Boyd's. I agree that the 1900 block is worse for wear, though.
Quote:
|
Also her comment about the land being too valuable for a single-story use is a bit odd--considering the dozens of single story buildings along chestnut street--most notably the large corner building (houses Vitamin Shoppe and Jimmy Johns) at a far more prime spot at 17th. And "single-story use" seems to be an understatement--they are keeping the facade in tact--then behind it, adding 8 cinemas and a restaurant/lounge space. This isn't the same thing as demo-ing an historic building, then throwing up a schlocky, 1 story lean-to with 760sf of retail space just to snatch some rent.
|
I think you're confusing
plant with
trajectory. The single-story buildings you're thinking of--what I'm referring to as (physical)
plant--are existing structures that were built when Philadelphia (and Chestnut Street) were at a very different place than they are today. And by
trajectory I mean the density of proposed projects (esp. relative to the plant).
The Buck, YWCA, Pearl right next door, and Brickstone projects all portend a significantly denser future for Chestnut (and I think we'll be seeing a replacement of underbuilt properties on the corridor). So yes, the Boyd proposal is jarring.
Quote:
|
Would this project be better served with a 30 story apartment tower above it? Sure. But, then again, not many projects wouldn't be.
|
As I've said before, I would be ok if (a) the Boyd was removed for a significantly denser property (follows trajectory) or (b) if it was restored (preserves a plant worth preserving). The proposal on the table does neither, and my sense is that it falls far short.