Edmonton Construction 11 (November 2011) - Page 500

240glt · #**9981** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 4:50 PM**

That's neat little project, very similar to our exceptional alley artworks project that has just stated in Alberta Avenue which should be a huge success

Back to towers, we just got the DP application notice for 102st Centre

Coldrsx · #**9982** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 4:54 PM**

^awesome

Hallsy's Toupee · #**9983** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 5:05 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by 240glt

Back to towers, we just got the DP application notice for 102st Centre

New major tenant must be imminent...Stantec? the City?

ScottieA · #**9984** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 5:05 PM**

Potentially the City's new home, or Stantec's? If it is Stantec then they lobbed off floors as per previous comments in this thread.

CMD UW · #**9985** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 5:08 PM**

I doubt COE, Stanny maybe, Enbridge maybe, ATCO potentially...

ScottieA · #**9986** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 5:09 PM**

I'm hoping Enbridge as they badly need to consolidate.

Coldrsx · #**9987** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 5:14 PM**

Ideally here is what i'd like to see:

Tower D - Stantec
102st - Enbridge
Take 9888 and reorganize what they have - City of Edmonton

ATCO is an interesting ingredient into the mix...

Coldrsx · #**9988** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 5:22 PM**

Job No 146278652-001: To increase the number of sleeping units for a Boarding and Lodging House from 27 units to 38 units and to construct interior alterations (addition of 11 sleeping units in basement and basement renovations)
9947 - 104 STREET NW
Plan NB Blk 3 Lots 62-63
APADANA WOMEN'S HOUSING LTD.
DOWNTOWN

240glt · #**9989** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 6:20 PM**

Enbridge is a 100% no.

I agree with Ian, 9888 is the ideal city tower

Stantec will go to either 102 or D

Coldrsx · #**9990** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 6:24 PM**

100%?

240glt · #**9991** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 6:33 PM**

^ yup.

Coldrsx · #**9992** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 6:48 PM**

Huh.

Just looked over the DP and variances, nothing bothering me.

s211 · #**9993** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 6:58 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by 240glt

Enbridge is a 100% no.

Well, that's a downer, as they'd be a nice pre-lease size. Otherwise, who else out there would be large enough?

Coldrsx · #**9994** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 7:00 PM**

160.4m for 102st tower.

ExcaliburKid · #**9995** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 7:06 PM**

So about 525' for us IP geeks

ScottieA · #**9996** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 8:05 PM**

By comparison, Epcor is 149.35 m (490.0 ft)

Kevin_foster · #**9997** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 8:08 PM**

Is AIMCo still involved with ownership of 102nd street tower?

CanadianCentaur · #**9998** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 8:14 PM**

I'd bet that if it wasn't for the height restriction due to the presence of City Centre Airport, Epcor would likely have been built even taller than Manulife.

Harrison · #**9999** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 8:54 PM**

Any idea of roof height? Epcor is only tallest currently because of the spires, while roof is something like 135m~, so let's hope 102 doesn't have tons of vanity height.

ScottieA · #**10000** Posted **Nov 29, 2013, 9:01 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harrison

Any idea of roof height? Epcor is only tallest currently because of the spires, while roof is something like 135m~, so let's hope 102 doesn't have tons of vanity height.

(http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/4561/lsua.jpg) (http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/1229/ma5u.jpg)