Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc
Really amazing. By 2020, Edmonton will be unrecognizable from today. Having just spent the weekend in Edmonton, I have realized that outside of the core, it actually feels like a larger city than Calgary... as if they planned for it to be as large as it has gotten, whereas Calgary seems to have only been planned to grow to 500 000. Inside the core, obviously Calgary's feels bigger, but Edmonton is just much more, or at least feels much more, built up throughout the city outside its core.
|
Hmm, I'm not sure. Like Cold, I'd say Calgary has more big city impact and at first glance can appear bigger. But once you dig a bit deeper, both Edmonton and Calgary feel about the same size (downtowns notwithstanding).
The thing I will say about Edmonton though is that it feels like the more matured of Alberta's two biggest cities. That's largely due to it being the biggest of the two for most of Alberta's history and having some nice seeds being planted early on in the city's development (capital city, main university, bigger river). Edmonton's 1950s and '60s inner suburbs are very quintessentially Edmonton. Whereas Calgary's post-y2k suburbs seem to define the overall built form more so than areas like Crescent Heights or International Ave.
There also seems to be more grandeur from buildings built between the 1910s and 1970s (Leg, Hotel MacDonald, High Level Bridge, CN Tower, Muttart, underground LRT). On the other hand, Calgary's buildings from the 1980s to present (Suncor, Bankers Hall, Peace Bridge, the Bow, Olympic Park) are more grand and 'iconic' than Edmonton's overall.