HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1101  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2013, 3:33 PM
alittle1 alittle1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Plessis is the dividing line between Winnipeg and the RM of Springfield, so yes the CP Trail could have been extended to Plessis within city limits. Anything west of Plessis is the COW.

sky,

You have been nominate to go and tell the people in the houses that their property is being expropriated for a lane widening on Plessis. They will tell you, "look at all the empty space behind that is sitting in weeds".

The solution was to wrap the roadway in a arc around the back of the Grassie development, overpass the CP mainline, Kildare extension and Regent Ave.

But Larry from Vickars met Sammy and a deal was cut. Hence, there now sits a new dealership that cuts the property right-a-way off at Regent and everything else South to Dugald has been sold.

Last edited by alittle1; Jul 3, 2013 at 5:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1102  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2013, 7:13 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by alittle1 View Post
sky,

You have been nominate to go and tell the people in the houses that their property is being expropriated for a lane widening on Plessis. They will tell you, "look at all the empty space behind that is sitting in weeds".

The solution was to wrap the roadway in a arc around the back of the Grassie development, overpass the CP mainline, Kildare extension and Regent Ave.

But Larry from Vickars met Sammy and a deal was cut. Hence, there now sits a new dealership that cuts the property right-a-way off at Regent and everything else South to Dugald has been sold.
I'm in agreement with your statement, trouble with Winnipeg is that there never seems to be a long term vision nor are roadways built for future growth, building for today is the norm in Winnipeg.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1103  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 1:52 AM
original original is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
I'm in agreement with your statement, trouble with Winnipeg is that there never seems to be a long term vision nor are roadways built for future growth, building for today is the norm in Winnipeg.
You mean building for the 1950's today is the norm for Winnipeg. With zero vision for future growth. Selling off land designated for future projects is the Winnipeg way
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1104  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 2:35 AM
cllew cllew is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,825
It's not only the city that can't see the future and gets rid of land for a quick buck.

I am sure if CP Rail could have seen the future of rail traffic, they would not have sold off the Bergen Cutoff like they did in the late 70's. They could have run all their hotshot container trains on that line and bypassed the congestion in the Winnipeg yards.

When they sold the right of way, everything was still shipped in boxcars and had to humped in the Winnipeg yards to go east or west of here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1105  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2013, 5:22 PM
alittle1 alittle1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 446
Note on Bergen Cutoff selloff.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
It's not only the city that can't see the future and gets rid of land for a quick buck.

I am sure if CP Rail could have seen the future of rail traffic, they would not have sold off the Bergen Cutoff like they did in the late 70's. They could have run all their hotshot container trains on that line and bypassed the congestion in the Winnipeg yards.

When they sold the right of way, everything was still shipped in boxcars and had to humped in the Winnipeg yards to go east or west of here.
One of the reasons for the closure of that track was instability of the rail line due to the gravel base and width, and foundation problems of the Swing bridge over the Red River.

A CPR bypass would be better served if it was located along the North Perimeter on the south side ditch line. This was proposed back in the mid-60's, as you have noted shipping was still taking place in boxcars, etc. therefore, progress ended that idea due to the City's expansion and container shipping became the norm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1106  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2013, 7:29 PM
cllew cllew is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,825
First I heard of the foundation problems at the river crossing, I guess even before Calgary's bridge failure, back then CP did not want to spend money to fix foundation problems on river crossings.

The story that is commonly told is CP closed the line down to to lack of rail traffic due to the Panama Canal opening, it was cheaper to ship by boat from coast to coast then use rail.

I wonder if they had kept the line in use, would the North Transcona yard have become the CP Winnipeg Intermodial Yard, and Chief Pegius being built years earlier as a route to take all the truck traffic?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1107  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2013, 7:40 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
First I heard of the foundation problems at the river crossing, I guess even before Calgary's bridge failure, back then CP did not want to spend money to fix foundation problems on river crossings.

The story that is commonly told is CP closed the line down to to lack of rail traffic due to the Panama Canal opening, it was cheaper to ship by boat from coast to coast then use rail.

I wonder if they had kept the line in use, would the North Transcona yard have become the CP Winnipeg Intermodial Yard, and Chief Pegius being built years earlier as a route to take all the truck traffic?
At the risk of veering off topic (but not too far since they more or less follow parallel routes) the Bergen Cutoff and North Transcona Yards are a local history topic that I'd love to see explored a little further.

After creating grandiose plans for a mammoth railyard and laying out a rail line around the city, the CPR more or less abandoned the whole thing a few years later. Why? What was the plan in the first place? Why was it abandoned? No one really seems to have any answers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1108  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2013, 7:46 PM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
At the risk of veering off topic (but not too far since they more or less follow parallel routes) the Bergen Cutoff and North Transcona Yards are a local history topic that I'd love to see explored a little further.

After creating grandiose plans for a mammoth railyard and laying out a rail line around the city, the CPR more or less abandoned the whole thing a few years later. Why? What was the plan in the first place? Why was it abandoned? No one really seems to have any answers.
I'm pretty sure the massive yard was abandoned by CP due to poor soil quality in that area. The sheds they had built were rapidly sinking into the ground. I would also be interested in learning more...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1109  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2013, 9:36 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,306
Wow, talk about massive. That definitely would have spurred crazy development in that area. Would have been another "suburb" of Winnipeg.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1110  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 12:27 AM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,764
Well, that was published in January 1913, which was nearing the end of the boom. The economy tailed off badly in 1913 and then the war began, which would have diverted industrial activity away from things like railway expansions, I would think. But there could be other less generalized explanations as well. Surely Christian Cassidy has a blog post on this somewhere!
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1111  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 12:52 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6 View Post
Well, that was published in January 1913, which was nearing the end of the boom. The economy tailed off badly in 1913 and then the war began, which would have diverted industrial activity away from things like railway expansions, I would think. But there could be other less generalized explanations as well. Surely Christian Cassidy has a blog post on this somewhere!
You would think so! But so far as I can tell, he hasn't. I also haven't come across any mention of it in newspaper articles or books, either.

I suppose things that didn't happen are almost always going to be less interesting than the ones that did, but this is an intriguing case given that a portion of the plan was actually built. The North Transcona Yards eventually did open on a much diminished scale, but it was never clear to me whether that was intended to be the start of a much bigger project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1112  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 1:51 AM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
You would think so! But so far as I can tell, he hasn't. I also haven't come across any mention of it in newspaper articles or books, either.

I suppose things that didn't happen are almost always going to be less interesting than the ones that did, but this is an intriguing case given that a portion of the plan was actually built. The North Transcona Yards eventually did open on a much diminished scale, but it was never clear to me whether that was intended to be the start of a much bigger project.
Can't remember where it was I read or heard it, but I'm pretty sure that it was the soil quality that put a halt to the plans. I'll try to dig it up, but in some history of Winnipeg book, there is mention of the ground being unstable in the area, and a shed/warehouse/feedmill sinking into the ground or shifting pretty badly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1113  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 3:27 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdog View Post
Can't remember where it was I read or heard it, but I'm pretty sure that it was the soil quality that put a halt to the plans. I'll try to dig it up, but in some history of Winnipeg book, there is mention of the ground being unstable in the area, and a shed/warehouse/feedmill sinking into the ground or shifting pretty badly.
You must be talking about this:



It happened 100 years ago this October! I wasn't aware that this incident (and the underlying issues) had anything to do with the North Transcona yard plan being abandoned.

OK, now I have officially veered way off topic. I better rein it in before cyrodill lets me have it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1114  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 3:49 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,519
that incident started a feild of engineering from what i understand. its amazing that they managed to right those silos proper again and are still standing today
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1115  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 5:50 AM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
You must be talking about this:



It happened 100 years ago this October! I wasn't aware that this incident (and the underlying issues) had anything to do with the North Transcona yard plan being abandoned.

OK, now I have officially veered way off topic. I better rein it in before cyrodill lets me have it.
Good find! Very interesting read.

Edit: I remember where I originally read about the land being too unstable to support the massive yards - in one of Jim Blanchard's Winnipeg History books, "Winnipeg 1912: Diary of a City".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1116  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 2:10 PM
cllew cllew is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,825
Which brings us back to the Pegius extension. I guess that the soil conditions were the reason that the road bed appeared to be excavated deeper than I had seen other areas done and back filled with crushed limestone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1117  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 2:36 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
My Dad had a photo of the repair operation of that elevator, it was pulled up with a team of steam locomotives.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1118  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 3:15 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,519
i know the photo it was hanging in borels books for years a large print of it. i know one can get at said photo if u go to the photo cafe thing that was on albert st i think their still there??
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1119  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 3:28 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,306
Everything about that is just huge. If that happened today it would be blown up and the hole filled in. Quite impressive they actually got it upright again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1120  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2013, 6:03 PM
cllew cllew is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdog View Post
Can't remember where it was I read or heard it, but I'm pretty sure that it was the soil quality that put a halt to the plans. I'll try to dig it up, but in some history of Winnipeg book, there is mention of the ground being unstable in the area, and a shed/warehouse/feedmill sinking into the ground or shifting pretty badly.
Is this what you were thinking of? Its an engineering presentation from 2003 on the jacking up of the silo's and the soil conditions.

http://www.cgs.ca/pdf/110928%20Introduction%20and%20papers.pdf

And here are pictures of the work being done;

http://www.cgs.ca/pdf/110916%20Skaftfeld%20photos%20Transcona%20Grain%20Elevator_MINIMIZED.pdf

Last edited by cllew; Aug 10, 2013 at 6:07 PM. Reason: added pictures
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:48 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.