Quote:
Originally Posted by plorenc
All these questions just get me wondering why developers don't just focus more energy on downtown/midtown until it's more significantly saturated with a critical mass of density. They're both well served by transit and have a decently connected street network, why can't we just have this development focus there? (Keep in mind: this is mostly rhetorical. I do realize that there are many, many more factors at play in site selection than simple accessibility, but I just wish it were more emphasized in development schemes)
|
The main reason: $$$.
Midtown's land prices are extremely high in anticipation for
future demand of high-end condo, apartment, and office development. That demand doesn't currently exist, and if you were to build out Midtown with product that could actually be absorbed by the
current Atlanta economy, we'd end up with a lot of these cheaper ~5 story stick-built affairs. I think we can all agree that a sea of Skyhouses would even be preferable to that.
Frankly, I'd rather wait the 10 or so years for gradual improvement in the market for quality development--the market that can sustain 20+ floor buildings and higher-end finishes--rather than build Midtown out completely with lowrise, cheaper stuff right now.
Just look at the bright side: the
worst Midtown will be in the next decade is right now. The other neighborhoods can have their cheaper, ~5 floor stick-built apartments. We'll stick with highrises and high(er) quality development in Midtown, which will take time but will maintain it as the best urban neighborhood in this part of the country.
In Buckhead, you have so incredibly much quasi-prime land available that it is a lot cheaper and can accommodate the various different strata of development in demand in Atlanta right now. But Midtown can't do this: a victim of its own urban success, in a way.
Downtown, of course, is driven by a completely different set of factors than Midtown--a different discussion entirely.