Quote:
Originally Posted by s211
I've been in the industry for 25 years, so I'm pretty sure I have a handle on commercial real estate and the concept of valuation. A few years less than you, perhaps, but I'm no greenhorn here.
Simply put, my sources tell me John's ascribing too much lift (pure profit) on what he wants for the hotel development rights, and if John's hearing that from more than one prospective purchaser, then hopefully he will get religion.
Don't worry, he will still make out like a very rich bandit when he locks a buyer down.
|
unless those prospective purchasers are intimately aware of john's development and delivery costs, i'm not sure how they can accurately ascribe too much lift (pure profit) on what john wants for the hotel development rights.
john's expectations might well be too expensive for them to meet their own return expectations in which case they need to adjust their expectations or reduce their costs in order to obtain them or pass on the deal.
like you i am a "bystander" here but, if anything, from what i have heard john's returns may well be stretched pretty thin already... which tells me that if the hotel component can't carry its own weight it may make more sense to consider a residential component or more office instead of treating them like a loss leader and trying to make it up elsewhere on a project that doesn't have a lot of elsewhere...
ps. i am not meaning to come across as "short" here or in my first reply for that matter. it's just frustrating to continually hear how developers "should" build this here and "should" build that there and "should" include this and "should not" include that when all of those things are something someone who doesn't have to pay for them simple "expects" to see.