HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7281  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 7:12 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
could be residential.
     
     
  #7282  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 7:15 PM
sync's Avatar
sync sync is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
could be residential.
i suppose.

so 72 floors at 10ft = 720ft residential.

would be nice to have 72 floors at 15ft = 1080ft commercial.

oh well, i can dream.
__________________
You will never get the crowd to cry Hosanna until you ride into town on an ass.
     
     
  #7283  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 7:49 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
Well what do we have here? Another Edmonton proposal!

....Melcor.... Manasc Issac Architects designed.....104th and 106th....hmmm...

(via DBA Spring Luncheon)
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #7284  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 8:02 PM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Surrealplaces View Post
That looks really good actually. I wouldn't mind an exact replica of that, but maybe use a more traditional colour at the top. Scotia Plaza colour?
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT

Last edited by isaidso; May 16, 2013 at 8:18 PM.
     
     
  #7285  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 8:10 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is online now
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Surrealplaces View Post
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but this potential taller 'than the Bow' proposal wouldn't be much taller, and might only be taller because of a spire. Taller by 30' might be about right.
While I'm not crazy for spires when they're done poorly, that is a skyline element Calgary could definitely use to break up the boxiness. Any idea if that's the 72 story beast that BlueCypress keeps cryptically referring to?
     
     
  #7286  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 8:28 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramako View Post
A spire would be fantastic news. That's one thing that Calgary's skyline is really lacking. A couple spires on a skyline really create a metropolitan feel.
Hopefully true spire and not NYC antenna (which was a real shame)
     
     
  #7287  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 8:32 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by rapid_business View Post
Well what do we have here? Another Edmonton proposal!

....Melcor.... Manasc Issac Architects designed.....104th and 106th....hmmm...

(via DBA Spring Luncheon)
Mixed use, retail/office/condo
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #7288  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 8:43 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Apparently there is an absolute plethora of proposals for Calgary that will be coming out in the coming months. Apparently moreso than was proposed/built for the unprecedented boom in 06-07.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7289  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 8:54 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is online now
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Apparently there is an absolute plethora of proposals for Calgary that will be coming out in the coming months. Apparently moreso than was proposed/built for the unprecedented boom in 06-07.
Yep. You're late to the conversation. We've already had more hints dropped on us.
     
     
  #7290  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 9:24 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Apparently there is an absolute plethora of proposals for Calgary that will be coming out in the coming months. Apparently moreso than was proposed/built for the unprecedented boom in 06-07.
There are piles actively being worked on, and a few are close to surfacing.
     
     
  #7291  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 9:47 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
Yep. You're late to the conversation. We've already had more hints dropped on us.
What do you mean late to the conversation? I'm reading the same Calgary Construction thread that you are
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7292  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 9:48 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Surrealplaces View Post
There are piles actively being worked on, and a few are close to surfacing.
Huh?
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7293  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 10:53 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is online now
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
What do you mean late to the conversation? I'm reading the same Calgary Construction thread that you are
I meant the conversation in this thread.
     
     
  #7294  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 11:10 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Oh I read all that already, but only two projects were mentioned. I was talking about the vast number of proposals, not just the biggest ones.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7295  
Old Posted May 16, 2013, 11:29 PM
lake of the nations's Avatar
lake of the nations lake of the nations is offline
Utilisateur enregistré
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sherbrooke
Posts: 2,044
MONTRÉAL - Le Drummond

Here is a new render of Le Drummond.


Les Affaires
     
     
  #7296  
Old Posted May 17, 2013, 12:10 AM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,918
^It's taller yes, but now it looks all...confused. Black here, grey there, weird window layout here and over there.

Still better than an empty lot.
     
     
  #7297  
Old Posted May 17, 2013, 2:50 AM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is online now
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Oh I read all that already, but only two projects were mentioned. I was talking about the vast number of proposals, not just the biggest ones.
Oh I didn't realize you"d read it as I had written a similar comment earlier.
     
     
  #7298  
Old Posted May 17, 2013, 7:20 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is online now
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Apparently there is an absolute plethora of proposals for Calgary that will be coming out in the coming months. Apparently moreso than was proposed/built for the unprecedented boom in 06-07.


That Boom pales in comparison to the early 80's boom.
     
     
  #7299  
Old Posted May 17, 2013, 7:45 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
^^ Less buildings.... More Height! ^^
     
     
  #7300  
Old Posted May 17, 2013, 7:58 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is online now
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,402
I don't know about that, there were towers of 75, 66, 64, 2@63, and multiple 50 storey proposals in the 80's boom. Not bad for a city of 500,000 at the time.

Edit: Sorry TallBob, I see you we're referring to a different post.

Last edited by craner; May 17, 2013 at 8:01 AM. Reason: Misread
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.