HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5081  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2012, 7:44 PM
capital_urbanite capital_urbanite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 36
blast from the past

I haven't posted to this forum in many years now, largely because watching the entire NSLRT boondoggle made me pretty sick of the whole process.

Flash forward 5 years and Ottawa seems to have finally got its ducks in a row re:rapid transit. I'm getting interested in the process again.

Several years ago I started a website (ottawalightrail.com) that followed the construction progress of the "train-to-nowhere" (known today as the O-train) pilot project. Thankfully, the web archive still has snapshots of that website and even access to some submissions from visitors who wanted to share there ideas of how rapid transit should evolve in Ottawa. You can check them out here: Visions

Because the city is embarking on a major upgrade of the O-Train line and now that construction of the Confederation Line is imminent, I would like to ask all of you whether you think a new website would be useful as a place to follow these important construction projects?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5082  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2012, 7:47 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by capital_urbanite View Post
I would like to ask all of you whether you think a new website would be useful as a place to follow these important construction projects?
I vote yes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5083  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2012, 9:04 PM
eemy's Avatar
eemy eemy is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by capital_urbanite View Post
I haven't posted to this forum in many years now, largely because watching the entire NSLRT boondoggle made me pretty sick of the whole process.

Flash forward 5 years and Ottawa seems to have finally got its ducks in a row re:rapid transit. I'm getting interested in the process again.

Several years ago I started a website (ottawalightrail.com) that followed the construction progress of the "train-to-nowhere" (known today as the O-train) pilot project. Thankfully, the web archive still has snapshots of that website and even access to some submissions from visitors who wanted to share there ideas of how rapid transit should evolve in Ottawa. You can check them out here: Visions

Because the city is embarking on a major upgrade of the O-Train line and now that construction of the Confederation Line is imminent, I would like to ask all of you whether you think a new website would be useful as a place to follow these important construction projects?
I remember that site! I actually still like this concept: http://web.archive.org/web/20030403154214/http://ottawalightrail.com/visions/scubway.pdf

Honestly, I'm not sure there will be enough stuff to post about to fill more than a few threads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5084  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2012, 10:35 PM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Another series of fine examples of lay people doing a better job of designing the transit system than the professionals. It's striking how what we're finally getting now is starting to look like what the amateurs came up with a decade ago. And look! All of the proposals with downtown tunnels had three downtown stations west of the Canal. Hmmm.

Glenn Gobuyan's proposal from 1998 is the one I prefer the most and back then he had figured on a 4-armed transit system using rail with the West Transitway going to Kanata, the O-Train going to Barrhaven via the VIA line, the Southeast Transitway going to the airport and the East Transitway going to Orleans.

Greg Ross and Harry Gow had come up with something similar back in the 1970s.
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5085  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 5:54 AM
Catenary Catenary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
There will be drivers, it's just not clear whether the drivers will actually do anything. Lots of metro systems have automatic control and drivers there for hood ornaments safety. Anyway, from what I've read, they will be entirely automated within the maintenance yard, but it's still unclear to me to what extent they will be under the control of this guy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cT8A9B2xz6Q
or this guy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEu4Iq5KL-Q
when the trains are in service, (and, for that matter whether it will be different in or out of the Tunnel, which there was some talk of earlier in the design process... back when there was going to be screens in the tunnel stations and such).
I did read that the trains will be completely automated in the yard, the report makes that quite clear. As for line operations, the only reason I can think of that this isn't fully automated is the chance that in the future there may be grade crossings or mixed running. Because SelTrac is more than capable of it, and based on the headways, I think it will likely be second grade of automation, with automatic train operation. The driver would exist only for emergencies, and to close the doors.

The next level of automation moves the driver from the cabin out into the car, but they still control the doors. London's DLR runs like this with door close buttons at each door for the train attendant to use at stops.There is a set of controls under a panel at the front, but it's not used in normal operation. The highest level of automation has no driver at all, but that's not going to happen anytime soon. There is also the possibility of Automatic Train Control, which helps maintain schedule, but I'm not sure it will be implemented.

Since it's fully grade separated at this time, operations in and out of the tunnel should be the same. Operation standards (like a drop to GoA 1, full driver control) would only happen if the system ran in mixed traffic somewhere in the future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5086  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 6:34 AM
eemy's Avatar
eemy eemy is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,425
Is any degree of automation possible with level crossings with barriers like we'd likely see on Iris or does that qualify as mixed traffic?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5087  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 4:56 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,077
What crap. From today's Citizen:
Bicycle racks would be close to station entrances, and park space and plazas would be expected at each site. 'People don't actually have memories of buildings, they have memories of spaces.'
Parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, FLIPPIN PARKS.

What is this city's damn obsession with pointless stupid green space, especially adjacent to its damn transit stations?

Honest to f-
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5088  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 5:30 PM
Capital Shaun Capital Shaun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
What crap. From today's Citizen:
Bicycle racks would be close to station entrances, and park space and plazas would be expected at each site. 'People don't actually have memories of buildings, they have memories of spaces.'
Parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, parks, FLIPPIN PARKS.

What is this city's damn obsession with pointless stupid green space, especially adjacent to its damn transit stations?

Honest to f-
I agree! No one is going to 'hang out' at these parks. Sure, put a few trees/bushes and some park benches but grass is way overated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5089  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 5:41 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
maybe not, but maybe they will

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capital Shaun View Post
No one is going to 'hang out' at these parks.
There sure were lots of people hanging out at Metro Mont Royal when the google streetview car went by: http://goo.gl/maps/YIW3o This open space around the station also gets used for market stalls, food vendors and other things that bring people and life.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5090  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 6:37 PM
Catenary Catenary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy_haak View Post
Is any degree of automation possible with level crossings with barriers like we'd likely see on Iris or does that qualify as mixed traffic?
Well "automation" is possible, but not in the way I think you mean. I do not know of any system that has Automatic Train Control that handles grade crossings, usually these systems are separated from both cars and pedestrians (fenced). That doesn't mean it's not possible, but rather highly unlikely (and a massive liability). There would continue to be Automatic Train Protection at all times, but that only keeps trains from running into each other/blowing signals, it doesn't "drive" the train.

I'm not sure how the switch between auto and manual would be handled. There is also the involvement of the dead man's switch, with this Grade of Automation (driver in cab, but not actually "driving") they likely have a switch that has to be held at all times, unlike unattended operations with a train agent on board. This may allow automation across the crossing, since the driver would be able to ensure it is clear and hold down the switch indicating so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5091  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 8:14 PM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy_haak View Post
Is any degree of automation possible with level crossings with barriers like we'd likely see on Iris or does that qualify as mixed traffic?
It remains to be seen whether Iris will be a level crossing or a grade-separated one. The early indications were that they wanted grade separation and were investigating such things as building an overpass for Iris, building ped/cyclist overpass only and closing off Iris, etc.

What the current thoughts on the Iris issue are no one knows because they are something like 18 months behind schedule and we haven't had any but the initial public meeting. Indeed, according to the schedule I have Council was supposed to have signed off on the final routing a year ago and it should have received the Fed/Prov EA approvals earlier in the first half of this year. Any kind of hope of tacking on an extension to the Confederation Line during construction (thus avoiding the waste of money that is Tunney's Pasture) is starting to fade.


On the topic of automation and level crossings... that's a whole other can of worms.

Oddly enough I can't actually find any legal reason it cannot be done (which is not to say it can be done - just that finding a prohibition against it is difficult). With respect to railways, the Province just applies Federal jurisdiction. But therein lies the problem: tt really is not at all clear what safety or regulatory regime light rail systems would operate under, or, for that matter, what safety or regulatory regime the TTC's metro system operates under. For example, there was a fatality in September involving a TTC worker on the subway system and the investigating authorities were not related to Transport Canada or the MTO but rather the police and the Ministry of Labour (and only there because it was deemed a workplace accident). The TTC's streetcars operate under the Highway Traffic Act since they operate in 'highways' (i.e. streets).

However, we already know that the City wishes to "self-regulate" its light rail system. One supposes that in a completely grade-separated system that self-regulation is a viable form of regulation since there is no real opportunity for collisions with other modes and any accidents would be investigated by the police, just as would any other kind of serious accident.

But once you have a system with grade operation that interacts with other forms of transport or individuals crossing the tracks, who gets to regulate it is a whole other question. It would nominally seem to be the Province as a Provincially-regulated railway, though since Ottawa's transit system is federally-regulated it would probably in fact be the feds. It could well be that the City's desire for self-regulation and its apparent predilection for grade-separation is a two-sides-of-the-same-coin or chicken-and-egg sort of thing.

Even right now it's not really clear what regulates the Transitway itself - but it sure isn't the HTA. The Police can't charge OC Transpo drivers for exceeding the speed "limit" on the Transitway, for instance. Where the Transitway crosses a regular road the HTA applies since you're entering a regular road (i.e. it's akin to leaving one's driveway). The City covers a lot of those crossings with traffic signals, but that's comparable to traffic lights controlling accesses to private shopping malls.

Interestingly, the Southwest Transitway in Barrhaven has an at-grade intersection with a private street in the big-box mall just south of Marketplace Station next to the Loblaws (the intersection with Marketplace itself is traffic light-controlled and Marketplace is a public street). Just what laws govern that intersection is an interesting question. Everyone just kind of assumes everyone will implicitly apply the HTA, but strictly speaking it doesn't apply.

So... the question you have to answer first for automation and level crossings is under what jurisdiction a rail transit system having level crossings falls, and then what rules exist concerning automation, if any.


Since you're in Kitchener, perhaps you have some idea as to what regulatory regime is being applied to the Waterloo LRT?
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5092  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 9:43 PM
eemy's Avatar
eemy eemy is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dado View Post
It remains to be seen whether Iris will be a level crossing or a grade-separated one. The early indications were that they wanted grade separation and were investigating such things as building an overpass for Iris, building ped/cyclist overpass only and closing off Iris, etc.

What the current thoughts on the Iris issue are no one knows because they are something like 18 months behind schedule and we haven't had any but the initial public meeting. Indeed, according to the schedule I have Council was supposed to have signed off on the final routing a year ago and it should have received the Fed/Prov EA approvals earlier in the first half of this year. Any kind of hope of tacking on an extension to the Confederation Line during construction (thus avoiding the waste of money that is Tunney's Pasture) is starting to fade.


On the topic of automation and level crossings... that's a whole other can of worms.

Oddly enough I can't actually find any legal reason it cannot be done (which is not to say it can be done - just that finding a prohibition against it is difficult). With respect to railways, the Province just applies Federal jurisdiction. But therein lies the problem: tt really is not at all clear what safety or regulatory regime light rail systems would operate under, or, for that matter, what safety or regulatory regime the TTC's metro system operates under. For example, there was a fatality in September involving a TTC worker on the subway system and the investigating authorities were not related to Transport Canada or the MTO but rather the police and the Ministry of Labour (and only there because it was deemed a workplace accident). The TTC's streetcars operate under the Highway Traffic Act since they operate in 'highways' (i.e. streets).

However, we already know that the City wishes to "self-regulate" its light rail system. One supposes that in a completely grade-separated system that self-regulation is a viable form of regulation since there is no real opportunity for collisions with other modes and any accidents would be investigated by the police, just as would any other kind of serious accident.

But once you have a system with grade operation that interacts with other forms of transport or individuals crossing the tracks, who gets to regulate it is a whole other question. It would nominally seem to be the Province as a Provincially-regulated railway, though since Ottawa's transit system is federally-regulated it would probably in fact be the feds. It could well be that the City's desire for self-regulation and its apparent predilection for grade-separation is a two-sides-of-the-same-coin or chicken-and-egg sort of thing.

Even right now it's not really clear what regulates the Transitway itself - but it sure isn't the HTA. The Police can't charge OC Transpo drivers for exceeding the speed "limit" on the Transitway, for instance. Where the Transitway crosses a regular road the HTA applies since you're entering a regular road (i.e. it's akin to leaving one's driveway). The City covers a lot of those crossings with traffic signals, but that's comparable to traffic lights controlling accesses to private shopping malls.

Interestingly, the Southwest Transitway in Barrhaven has an at-grade intersection with a private street in the big-box mall just south of Marketplace Station next to the Loblaws (the intersection with Marketplace itself is traffic light-controlled and Marketplace is a public street). Just what laws govern that intersection is an interesting question. Everyone just kind of assumes everyone will implicitly apply the HTA, but strictly speaking it doesn't apply.

So... the question you have to answer first for automation and level crossings is under what jurisdiction a rail transit system having level crossings falls, and then what rules exist concerning automation, if any.


Since you're in Kitchener, perhaps you have some idea as to what regulatory regime is being applied to the Waterloo LRT?
I don't know, actually, although the HTA would likely apply at least in part due to the portions along King and other streets.

I imagine the MTO could claim jurisdiction since it is crossing a public roadway; however, I wouldn't be surprised if there are no relevant regulations since this scenario hasn't really arisen yet in Ontario.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5093  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 10:56 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
What is the water level beneath Iris? Is it possible to depress the LRT line below Iris (without changing the current grae of Iris) without flooding issues? That is the only viable solution I can think of, short of closing Iris.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5094  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 10:57 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,610
With enough engineering, anything is possible. Whether it is worth it is a harder question.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5095  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2012, 11:31 PM
Capital Shaun Capital Shaun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
There sure were lots of people hanging out at Metro Mont Royal when the google streetview car went by: http://goo.gl/maps/YIW3o This open space around the station also gets used for market stalls, food vendors and other things that bring people and life.
It helps if there's other things in and around the park then just grass. The example in Mont-Royal is also a station in an established neighbourhood.

I'm not against building parks. But if we're building them just for the sake of building them then why bother?

Look at our planned LRT stations with lots of greenspace with potential to build parks: Hurdman, Lebreton, Bayview... There's very little around those at the moment! In the short term I can only see Tunney's Pasture have such a park since many parts of the area are slated to be redeveloped anyways.

None of the stations east of Rideau (except maybe Hurdman if it is ever developed) will ever have such parks since they're all right next to major highways and the existing development has very little residential nearby. Campus is institutional, Train & Cyrville are in industrial areas and St-Laurent & Blair are shopping centres surrounded by big box retail.

To get busy urban parks at stations like the example in Mont-Royal we'd have to bury the LRT under existing established main streets like Richmond-Wellington-Somerset, Bronson, Gladstone, Bank, Elgin/Main, Rideau-Montreal, etc... locations where lots people are likely to be coming or going at other times of day than just rush hour.

Look, this LRT is mostly to shuttle suburbanites to downtown more efficiently. Especially those front the east end. I'm not against the LRT project but it wouldn't have been my first choice for mass transit. I would have built an east-west line before replacing the TransitWay. (It would have helped to alleviate the traffic mess we're going to get when the buses get diverted for a couple years.)

Last edited by Capital Shaun; Dec 13, 2012 at 11:50 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5096  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2012, 12:17 AM
Dado's Avatar
Dado Dado is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by eternallyme View Post
What is the water level beneath Iris? Is it possible to depress the LRT line below Iris (without changing the current grae of Iris) without flooding issues? That is the only viable solution I can think of, short of closing Iris.
Pinecrest Creek passes diagonally under the Iris-Transitway intersection in a box culvert. I'd guess it is about 2 m below the road surface, which you can see from the cycle path. When it emerges from the culvert to the northwest, the remainder of the creek all the way to the Queensway (under which it passes in another box culvert) has got a liner below it. If you mess around in the bush ( ), you can actually find bits of the liner sticking out of the top of the embankment. This was no doubt done to minimize the likelihood of water draining into the Transitway cutting from the creek.

The simplest solution to grade-separating the Iris crossing is to divert Pinecrest Creek further upstream; it starts on the east side of the Transitway from a point somewhere near the fire station on Woodroffe, crosses under the Transitway to the west side and then loops back to the east side, running parallel to the Transitway until crossing under it again at Iris. It could be diverted at the point where it begins to loop back under the Transitway and just run it on the west side and under Iris to the existing creek. What's left of the creek on the east side could just be turned into a stormwater facility with its flow reversed.
__________________
Ottawa's quasi-official motto: "It can't be done"
Ottawa's quasi-official ethos: "We have a process to follow"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5097  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2012, 12:22 AM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
There sure were lots of people hanging out at Metro Mont Royal when the google streetview car went by: http://goo.gl/maps/YIW3o This open space around the station also gets used for market stalls, food vendors and other things that bring people and life.
There you go.

Market stalls. Food vendors. Other things.

NOT BLOODY GRASS AND SHRUBS FOR THE SAKE OF BLOODY GRASS AND SHRUBS, which is all the dumbass planners in Ottawa seem to know how to do, and all the public ever seems to want.

More vibrancy through grass.

Jebus H Jebus on a Jebus stick.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5098  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2012, 2:58 AM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post

Market stalls. Food vendors. Other things.

.
But not that day, it was just a bunch of people, on the grass, under the trees, by the shrubs. Some are hanging out. Most are probably waiting for a bus. The designers of the station didn't have to leave the open space forty years ago, and some people probably questioned it at the time, "what will people do there? Deal drugs? Why would you stop?" Etc. And maybe nobody did for a while, I doubt there were stalls and vendors locating there at the time, and maybe they weren't even envisaged back then, or even permitted! But they made the space and now people use it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5099  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2012, 3:31 AM
Capital Shaun Capital Shaun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
But not that day, it was just a bunch of people, on the grass, under the trees, by the shrubs. Some are hanging out. Most are probably waiting for a bus. The designers of the station didn't have to leave the open space forty years ago, and some people probably questioned it at the time, "what will people do there? Deal drugs? Why would you stop?" Etc. And maybe nobody did for a while, I doubt there were stalls and vendors locating there at the time, and maybe they weren't even envisaged back then, or even permitted! But they made the space and now people use it.
It helps that the park is surrounded by what appears to be a medium density area. Most of our LRT stations are not in that kind of neighbourhood nor will they become such neighbourhoods in the near future.

I think the western extension along Richmond/Byron might develop this way but not most of the stations of the current LRT project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5100  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2012, 4:41 AM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
But not that day, it was just a bunch of people, on the grass, under the trees, by the shrubs. Some are hanging out. Most are probably waiting for a bus. The designers of the station didn't have to leave the open space forty years ago, and some people probably questioned it at the time, "what will people do there? Deal drugs? Why would you stop?" Etc. And maybe nobody did for a while, I doubt there were stalls and vendors locating there at the time, and maybe they weren't even envisaged back then, or even permitted! But they made the space and now people use it.
The spaces being designed into the Ottawa LRT stations are not such spaces. Downtown, there are none; further out, it's just stupid pointless grass.

The Montreal example works because there's CITY around the station, not because of the pointless stupid idiotic vibrating green open public open green public open stupid idiot space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:40 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.