HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2008, 9:30 PM
Markus41 Markus41 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: City of Champions
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Millstone View Post
If AB wasn't so far away I'd be there.
You shouldn't let distance stop you; there is plenty of room out here in Big-Sky country

Besides, given Ontario's current economic situation, I'm sure there will be plenty of people packing up and heading west.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2008, 10:14 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam View Post
Apparently many people living around the tar sands are against further developments.
Further development of the tarsands is not likely in the near future. It is not economically feasible to produce oil from the tar sands unless the price of a barrel of oil rises above $90. We've got a couple of years yet before prices return to levels that would support tar sand development.

Having said that, just a gentle reminder that we are way off topic. After all, this thread's topic is the RHVP.

PS RHT's comments earlier today about Albertans is much more revealing of his own personal ignorance than of theirs. But I suppose his prejudicial attitude towards Albertans will be shrugged off with a 'chill' or 'just kidding' comment followed by a LOL or two...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2008, 12:46 AM
adam adam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Downtown Hamilton
Posts: 1,231
How can a thread about a highway contribute to a skyscraper forum anyway?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2008, 3:06 AM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
Um, a highway would be considered a significant part of any city's transportation and infrastructure. Which is why this highway is being discussed in the forum's 'Transportation and Infrastructure' section.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2008, 3:07 AM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
sorry for my ignorance. Pretty sad world we live in when speaking out against disease, death, sickness and destruction of the things that sustain human life - air, water, food - makes someone 'ignorant'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2008, 3:24 AM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
Sorry, but the statement that 'all Albertans love pollution' is a purely ignorant statement. This is what I am taking issue with.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2008, 3:30 AM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by markbarbera View Post
Sorry, but the statement that 'all Albertans love pollution' is a purely ignorant statement. This is what I am taking issue with.
LOL...ok, you got me there. maybe not ALL Albertans love pollution.
Seems that most do based on their voting patterns and lack of input on some pretty health-devastating projects in their province.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2008, 4:05 AM
Greco Roman Greco Roman is offline
Movin' on up
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
maybe not ALL Albertans love pollution.
No, we don't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2008, 4:47 PM
adam adam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Downtown Hamilton
Posts: 1,231
I don't think anyone likes pollution. Calgary has a light rail system already. Something we are working towards.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2008, 12:11 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,366
Last QEW-Red Hill ramp to open this month

December 16, 2008
The Hamilton Spectator
http://www.thespec.com/News/Local/article/482768

Frustrated commuters are less than two weeks away from direct Niagara-bound access to the Red Hill Valley Parkway from the Queen Elizabeth Way.

Ministry of Transportation spokesperson Will MacKenzie said the new ramp east of Woodward Avenue will be open "before Christmas."

MacKenzie said there's "two to three days of work left" but crews have been hampered by inclement weather.

"We just need a couple of good days," he said, adding that most of the outstanding work involves little touches such as painting traffic lines and general cleanup at the site.

The ramp is the last of four connecting the parkway to the QEW and will provide access to the southbound parkway for Niagara-bound QEW traffic.

Commuters have been forced to take Centennial Parkway but many are opting to get off at Woodward and head to Barton Street to hop on the parkway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 11:19 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,366
Niagara-bound ramp opened today.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2010, 10:23 AM
LikeHamilton's Avatar
LikeHamilton LikeHamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 2,760
Air pollution down, even next to expressway

Ken Mann AM900 CHML 6/14/2010

Some surprising findings, perhaps, in regards to air quality.

The results of air monitoring show that air quality has improved in the vicinity of the Red Hill Valley Parkway, since the highway opened to traffic three years ago.

Jennifer DiDomenico, with Hamilton's public works department, says the post-construction monitoring was carried out over a six-month period last year (May through October) at the King Street interchange.

When compared to testing in the same location back in 1998, it shows a 67% reduction in carbon monoxide, a 51% cut in nitrogen oxides, a 43% drop in total suspended particulates and an 11% reduction in particulate matter.

DiDomencio believes road design, specifically the channeling of the parkway within the valley, has helped to contain vehicle emissions.

She adds that weather patterns and reduced levels of manufacturing in the city's east end are also likely factors, as is greater public awareness and action towards air pollution snce 1998.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2010, 2:28 PM
BrianE's Avatar
BrianE BrianE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 352
Wow. Cherry picking much?

Last year was one of the best years in decades for air quality accross all of Southern Ontario due to a cooler than average summer and favorable weather patterns. Also Stelco and Dofasco were not operating during this time. Many other heavy industries were also not operating last summer.

Compared to 1998 one of the hottest summers EVER with all industries producing like crazy.

Maybe we should get a few more datapoints just to make sure we have the full picture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2010, 5:23 AM
crhayes crhayes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Hammer, Ontario
Posts: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianE View Post
Wow. Cherry picking much?

Last year was one of the best years in decades for air quality accross all of Southern Ontario due to a cooler than average summer and favorable weather patterns. Also Stelco and Dofasco were not operating during this time. Many other heavy industries were also not operating last summer.

Compared to 1998 one of the hottest summers EVER with all industries producing like crazy.

Maybe we should get a few more datapoints just to make sure we have the full picture.
Yupp this is why you can't blindly accept everything you read.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2012, 10:43 AM
bornagainbiking bornagainbiking is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Hamilton
Posts: 805
Some pluses

DRESCHEL: Red Hill parkway is a cash cow for the city
$20 million in taxes 'conservative estimate'

From Hamilton Spectator, 6 June 2012,
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2012, 12:50 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Perhaps the headline should read 'New tax dollars flooding into the city from RHVP.'
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2012, 3:47 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,366
Motion from Merulla....

Advertising along the Red Hill Valley Parkway and Lincoln Alexander Parkway

That staff be directed to bring a report to the General Issues Committee, which explores advertising along the Red Hill Valley Parkway as well as the Lincoln Alexander Parkway (LINC) in order to maximize revenues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2012, 8:18 PM
fuller fuller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 142
Well I hope the proposal brings in more revenue than added costs to the city.

There may be a reason why advertising is banned along major provincial highways to a distance of, I think, five hundred feet. Any increase in accidents could easily wipe out the revenue from such a scheme.

Don't drivers already have enough distractions?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2012, 9:37 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,786
I don't mind this. I kind of enjoy looking at the ads along the Gardiner in Toronto, especially when they get creative. I have fond memories of the KFC, Dominion and Inglis ones in particular as a kid.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2012, 7:00 AM
Millstone Millstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Port Colborne, ON
Posts: 889
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuller View Post
Well I hope the proposal brings in more revenue than added costs to the city.

There may be a reason why advertising is banned along major provincial highways to a distance of, I think, five hundred feet. Any increase in accidents could easily wipe out the revenue from such a scheme.

Don't drivers already have enough distractions?
The Hamilton freeways aren't built to 400-series standards, hence their low speed limit. Hamilton can basically do whatever the F they want. But I would stick to putting flashy things on straightaways and not curves like at the south end of the RHVP.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:35 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.