Quote:
Originally Posted by ajiuO
Only problem is.. There are not any ultra rich guys in the area that are willing to buy an NFL or MLB team.. I don't personally watch either but would opt for an NFL stadium... Because of other large events that could potently be hosted there. That would be awesome for SLC to host wrestlemania or the Super Bowl... The 2 largest attended live events each year.
|
Not to mention, home of the 2026 opening and closing ceremonies!
I think I would honestly prefer an NFL or MLB stadium be located in the Grainary District rather than tucked between I-15 and the Intermodal hub. It doesn't allow for a natural flow of pedestrians into the surrounding streets to go to bars and restaurants. I am basing this observation off of my time in Cleveland, Progressive Field (MLB) is right in the heart of downtown while Browns Stadium is between the water front and several sets of tracks, and next to the Rock Hall and a Science Center. The area surrounding Progressive Field is much more developed and active.
As for which I would prefer, I would love an NFL team, but a MLB team would have a much larger economic impact to the city and the surrounding neighborhood. MLB has 81 home games, vs 8 home games for the NFL.
Average Stadium size in the NFL 70,657
Average Attendace 95% 67,124
Total over home schedule 536,990
Average MLB Stadium 43,282
Average Attendance 71.96% 31,145
Total over home schedule 2,522,784
That's over 4 times (MLB over NFL) the amount of people attending games, and putting money into the economy, just based on those actually going to the stadium. Not to mention that NFL has a much more tailgate oriented atmosphere, while that isn't the case for MLB.