HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4921  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2012, 5:57 PM
Cage Cage is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
Bikes: Shouldn't be in the bus lane. Dedicated bike lanes on other streets (8th avenue, 3rd avenue, 2nd street etc) should accommodate bicycles..
Thanks for the clarification. This could be an issue with second bus only lane as bicycles will always be attempting to utilize the road space away from cars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
[Capacity My greatest critique of concerns about capacity and congestion is that often they use the wrong metric. Congestion should be measured in person-hour delays, not vehicle delays. A full bus is equivalent to 80 vehicles (give or take), so a bus should technically be weighted 80 times higher than a vehicle. The whole point is to increase the efficiency of the movement of people. If vehicles are slowed down, but more people on transit improve their travel time, it is a net benefit and we should pursue it.
Got your critique on capacity and congestion metrics. Could you expand as to how commercial vehicles and other cargo transports fit into your revised metric calculations? I believe a bus needs to be weighted more than a car, but what about bus vs delivery van and bus vs 18 wheeler?
     
     
  #4922  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2012, 6:53 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
Thanks for the clarification. This could be an issue with second bus only lane as bicycles will always be attempting to utilize the road space away from cars.



Got your critique on capacity and congestion metrics. Could you expand as to how commercial vehicles and other cargo transports fit into your revised metric calculations? I believe a bus needs to be weighted more than a car, but what about bus vs delivery van and bus vs 18 wheeler?
In terms of "congestion", which is most pronounced during the rush hours, we need to consider the number of people in a vehicle. During rush hour, it is best to maximize the number of people per unit of road space, because congestion ultimately results from too many people and not enough road space. This is why trains and buses should be prioritized- they are making the best use of space on a per person basis.

Delivery vans and trucks serve different purposes than cars and buses- they are primarily moving freight and packages, not people. As such, their peak periods of use are not during the rush hours, and should be accommodated differently. From my experience in other cities, the best way to deal with large deliveries, is to restrict their hours of operation. Places like New York and Barcelona (IIRC) restrict delivery hours to evenings. This way the roads don't end up clogged with delivery trucks during rush hours. Calgary should consider the same for the downtown.
     
     
  #4923  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2012, 7:12 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
On another note- if any of you have ideas about ways to improve transit, let me know and I can help you post a blog on our website. Just DM me if you are interested. We are always looking for new ideas and different perspectives.
     
     
  #4924  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2012, 7:16 PM
Full Mountain's Avatar
Full Mountain Full Mountain is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,938
On a slightly different, but related topic, has the city ever done a study as to the effect that signal prioritization downtown for the C-Train would have? I noticed this on the trams in SF when I was there recently, it seems like it would be a good way to decrease delays and increase capacity until the 8th ave subway can be built, without a significant cost to implement. Does the benefit to the C-Train out weigh the delays that would be caused in the cross street traffic?
     
     
  #4925  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2012, 1:39 AM
ByeByeBaby's Avatar
ByeByeBaby ByeByeBaby is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Mountain View Post
On a slightly different, but related topic, has the city ever done a study as to the effect that signal prioritization downtown for the C-Train would have? I noticed this on the trams in SF when I was there recently, it seems like it would be a good way to decrease delays and increase capacity until the 8th ave subway can be built, without a significant cost to implement. Does the benefit to the C-Train out weigh the delays that would be caused in the cross street traffic?
Already ahead of you.

The city did a study a few years back that optimized the signals downtown for the train. My understanding is that the signals are now set to the most optimal timing possible for the trains that doesn't totally wreck car traffic. The biggest problem, as far as I know, is where some jackass is holding the train and delaying it enough to miss the green band.

And outside of the downtown, with the gates, the train effectively has signal priority everywhere else.
     
     
  #4926  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2012, 4:42 AM
You Need A Thneed's Avatar
You Need A Thneed You Need A Thneed is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,892
Track testing starts on Monday for the NE LRT extension.
     
     
  #4927  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2012, 3:43 PM
Jeffsey500 Jeffsey500 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by ByeByeBaby View Post
The biggest problem, as far as I know, is where some jackass is holding the train and delaying it enough to miss the green band.
Somebody has got to do something about those doors... We are way too nice about letting people do that here.
     
     
  #4928  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2012, 5:15 PM
Offside_Ref Offside_Ref is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffsey500 View Post
Somebody has got to do something about those doors... We are way too nice about letting people do that here.
They could start my changing the "please stay clear of the doors" and "one or more of the doors is still open..." to "please do not hold the doors. the next train will arrive shortly".

People are generally responsive to being in the way of the doors, but they don't give a — about the warnings if they're holding the doors open. Maybe they could get the transit cops to stand at the ends of the train to ticket people delaying the train.
     
     
  #4929  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2012, 5:25 PM
Full Mountain's Avatar
Full Mountain Full Mountain is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffsey500 View Post
Somebody has got to do something about those doors... We are way too nice about letting people do that here.
They need to change them so that at a certain point the operator presses a button and the doors close, the only override would be the door edge sensors not the optical sensors at the bottom, not many people will be willing to stick their hands into a closing door to get on a train.
     
     
  #4930  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 2:01 AM
floobie floobie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 474
Quote:
Originally Posted by ByeByeBaby View Post
Already ahead of you.

The city did a study a few years back that optimized the signals downtown for the train. My understanding is that the signals are now set to the most optimal timing possible for the trains that doesn't totally wreck car traffic. The biggest problem, as far as I know, is where some jackass is holding the train and delaying it enough to miss the green band.

And outside of the downtown, with the gates, the train effectively has signal priority everywhere else.
My experience is consistent with this. The timing is fine, it's idiots un-knowingly blocking the doors, or holding them for other people.

Our doors need to be much more aggressive. I like the more "metro" approach... all of them open when the train stops, then all of them close at once. Throw in a sensor so people don't lose their arms, but make it pretty unforgiving. ie. The sensor prevents the door from closing on a limb/bag/stroller/whatever but doesn't cause it to open all the way allowing the person on the train. It should be a safety feature, but not a "last minute let me on" feature.
     
     
  #4931  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 2:13 AM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,865
Some video flyovers (no sound) of the NW line extension.

• Video Link


• Video Link


• Video Link
     
     
  #4932  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 5:28 AM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,083
Nice. I like the look of the station.
     
     
  #4933  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 6:50 AM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by floobie View Post
My experience is consistent with this. The timing is fine, it's idiots un-knowingly blocking the doors, or holding them for other people.

Our doors need to be much more aggressive. I like the more "metro" approach... all of them open when the train stops, then all of them close at once. Throw in a sensor so people don't lose their arms, but make it pretty unforgiving. ie. The sensor prevents the door from closing on a limb/bag/stroller/whatever but doesn't cause it to open all the way allowing the person on the train. It should be a safety feature, but not a "last minute let me on" feature.
One possible problem with that is it would be freezing in the winter, but then again, maybe it would actually make people stand in the middle of the cars rather than congregate at the doors.
     
     
  #4934  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 2:45 PM
Full Mountain's Avatar
Full Mountain Full Mountain is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyEdge View Post
One possible problem with that is it would be freezing in the winter, but then again, maybe it would actually make people stand in the middle of the cars rather than congregate at the doors.
What if the closing of the doors was automatic but they only opened if someone pressed the button, this would eliminate the issue of the cold, but still allow for a more aggressive approach to closing the doors
     
     
  #4935  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 6:03 PM
You Need A Thneed's Avatar
You Need A Thneed You Need A Thneed is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,892
I can confirm that there is a LRV on the new NE extension for testing. Car 2036 was around the switches here in Martindale this morning.
     
     
  #4936  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 6:06 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Mountain View Post
What if the closing of the doors was automatic but they only opened if someone pressed the button, this would eliminate the issue of the cold, but still allow for a more aggressive approach to closing the doors
I think the problem with that is if they're programmed to be open for 10 seconds, and someone presses the button at second #8 then they will only open for a second or two. I think the cold issue might not be as bad as I thought.
     
     
  #4937  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 6:39 PM
You Need A Thneed's Avatar
You Need A Thneed You Need A Thneed is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,892
Pictures of the test LRV on the new NE extension:



     
     
  #4938  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 6:56 PM
Full Mountain's Avatar
Full Mountain Full Mountain is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyEdge View Post
I think the problem with that is if they're programmed to be open for 10 seconds, and someone presses the button at second #8 then they will only open for a second or two. I think the cold issue might not be as bad as I thought.
You could avoid that with the buttons only being active for the first 3 seconds of a 10 second dwell time and then they are disabled, that way the door cycle time is reduced and only the doors that have people at them when the car arrives open.

Something like this:
Train Arrives
Buttons Enabled
Button Pressed = Option 1
or
Button NOT Pressed = Option 2

Option 1
Door Opens
Depart Warning
Door Closes
Reset

Option 2
Button Enable Timer = Done
Button Disabled
Depart Warning
Reset

This achieves the objective of giving the trains the ability to leave on time and keeps the doors from opening when not needed.
     
     
  #4939  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 9:07 PM
JayCortese
 
Posts: n/a
This is good, we've really needed these extensions for a very long time
     
     
  #4940  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2012, 9:11 PM
JayCortese
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need A Thneed View Post
I can confirm that there is a LRV on the new NE extension for testing. Car 2036 was around the switches here in Martindale this morning.
I live at hamptons, so i'm not very aware of the transit projects.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:39 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.