HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2861  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 3:52 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2862  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 3:54 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2863  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 3:56 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2864  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 4:03 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is offline
Sawmill Billowtoker
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockin' in Edmonton
Posts: 14,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_foster View Post
What the mayfair should/could have been. (approx same height, footprint, etc.)

That lot was prime for virtually any size or type of development you could imagine.

This is how I feel.
Except they realised they couldn't build anything like that on that property, what with the whole load bearing issue. All you could get was something of similar shape with possibly similar design features.
     
     
  #2865  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 4:52 PM
bkd bkd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 363
This looks like a development for buttfuck Saskabush or Manitoba.

How embarrassing. Procura should be banned from ever putting up any of their repulsive shit in this city again.
     
     
  #2866  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:01 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2867  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:01 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkd View Post
This looks like a development for buttfuck Saskabush or Manitoba.

How embarrassing. Procura should be banned from ever putting up any of their repulsive shit in this city again.
It's about par for an Ellerslie motel, which in itself would be a wonderful expression of

Welcome to Edmonton: This is the Best We Can Do. Avert Your Gaze.
     
     
  #2868  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:03 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xelebes View Post
Except they realised they couldn't build anything like that on that property, what with the whole load bearing issue. All you could get was something of similar shape with possibly similar design features.
I truly wonder if it's not an issue of CAN'T, versus deciding that it wasn't cost effective. Think about it, what sort of architect would put together the original design without taking the LRT line into account? Something smells fishy here.
     
     
  #2869  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:20 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is offline
Sawmill Billowtoker
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockin' in Edmonton
Posts: 14,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
I truly wonder if it's not an issue of CAN'T, versus deciding that it wasn't cost effective. Think about it, what sort of architect would put together the original design without taking the LRT line into account? Something smells fishy here.
There could be a few issues here. The LRT Tunnel could have had some weakening happen over the span of the construction. There might be more than what we are privy to.
     
     
  #2870  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:21 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is offline
Sawmill Billowtoker
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockin' in Edmonton
Posts: 14,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Remember, that is the most marquis building planned in Saskatoon. Mayfair never was going to be planned as the most marquis building in Edmonton.
     
     
  #2871  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:29 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
The timing of this and the "edmonton doesn't like glass, it likes brick" comments should tell you all you need to know about what has changed with Procura. This isn't switch and bait or value inengineering, its the shitty direction Procura is going in with their new senior management. Plain and simple.

Procura is the new TNP.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
     
     
  #2872  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:37 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHOFEAR View Post

Procura is the new TNP.
You wash your mouth out with soap! That's a swear word 'round these parts
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
     
     
  #2873  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:42 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
'Remember, that is the most marquis building planned in Saskatoon. Mayfair never was going to be planned as the most marquis building in Edmonton.'

Perhaps, but it is on a 'marquis' corner...
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2874  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:48 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is offline
Sawmill Billowtoker
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockin' in Edmonton
Posts: 14,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
'Remember, that is the most marquis building planned in Saskatoon. Mayfair never was going to be planned as the most marquis building in Edmonton.'

Perhaps, but it is on a 'marque' corner...
That intersection has a long way to go to become a marquis corner.
     
     
  #2875  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:49 PM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
Briareos Hecatonchires
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Big E
Posts: 3,805
Probably the only redeeming factor in the new Mayfair on the corner is the curving design. Other than that, it's well, ugh. But at least it's not as bad as Peregrine Point, but still... Looks like a bunch of college dorms, in fact.
__________________
Edmonton/Amiskwacîwâskahikan Lat. 53° 34'N Elevation 671 m (2201 ft) Pop. 1,010,899 (2021 city) 1,418,118 (2021 metro) - North America's northernmost metro area over one million.
     
     
  #2876  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:51 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xelebes View Post
That intersection has a long way to go to become a marquis corner.
Marquis in terms of traffic, pedestrians, and visibility.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2877  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 5:56 PM
Albicaulis's Avatar
Albicaulis Albicaulis is offline
I smash you
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 261
Soooooo the LRT tunnel can only support cheap building matierals and horrific design?
     
     
  #2878  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 6:49 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is offline
Sawmill Billowtoker
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockin' in Edmonton
Posts: 14,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Marquis in terms of traffic, pedestrians, and visibility.
True, but look at the other three corners. You have the quirky but not spectacular 60s design on the north end, a soon-to-be modified 70s hum-drum design and a hole quickly filled by some desperate 90s po-mo. It<s got a long ways to go before that corner absolutely demands it.

The building is rental. You have got to expect rental designs.
     
     
  #2879  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 6:59 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
^well if that doesn't sum up why we get what we get.... come on now.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2880  
Old Posted May 7, 2012, 7:00 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is offline
Sawmill Billowtoker
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockin' in Edmonton
Posts: 14,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^well if that doesn't sum up why we get what we get.... come on now.
Yes, yes, dream big for 1200 dollars a month rentals!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:35 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.