HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4181  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2012, 8:14 PM
Dale Dale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Propose, rezone, get approved, sell for considerably more than current value.
Bummer ... I got all excited there for a minute.
     
     
  #4182  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2012, 8:57 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
I still give it better odds of going into sales/ starting than the Halifax proposal.
     
     
  #4183  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2012, 9:16 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,369
And why exactly would that be?
     
     
  #4184  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2012, 9:34 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
I don't think Halifax is big enough and Rich enough to handle that many condos.

if it happens I'll repent right here.
     
     
  #4185  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 1:01 AM
yyzer's Avatar
yyzer yyzer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 757
I'm not sure which location he is referenciing, but local Toronto Star columnist Christopher Hume posted the following quote today....

Quote:
Proposals brought before the Toronto Waterfront Design Review Panel last week include a 75-storey mixed-use condo tower at 10 York St., and a little further east, a massive scheme with two 30-plus-storey condos and 70-storey office tower.
He may be talking about 90 Harbour, if so the addition of a 70 storey office tower there would be news...

http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1144461--hume-toronto-s-towers-and-life-under-the-gardiner?bn=1
     
     
  #4186  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 1:06 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
That is 90 Harbour but Hume messed up. One 30 storey office, two 70 storey condos.
     
     
  #4187  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 5:56 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
old rendering yes... and about 41.

new proposal is 65 and 235m
It's about time Edmonton started building 200 m+ buildings. It's one of the fastest and richest cities in north America. Poorer cities with slower % growth like Toronto build tons of big condos, so why not Edmonton. This is a city growing by 25,000 people/year.
     
     
  #4188  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 2:09 PM
Andrewjm3D's Avatar
Andrewjm3D Andrewjm3D is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
It's about time Edmonton started building 200 m+ buildings. It's one of the fastest and richest cities in north America. Poorer cities with slower % growth like Toronto build tons of big condos, so why not Edmonton. This is a city growing by 25,000 people/year.

What makes Toronto a poorer city? You seem to relate median household incomes with a cities wealth. If that's the case then you must think New York City is an extremely poor city compared to Edmonton. Edmonton can't build 200+ until they move their airport. No one can say for sure why Edmonton and even Calgary aren't building condos en-mas might just be down to the fact that the condo culture doesn't exist there yet.
     
     
  #4189  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 3:41 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
A cities wealth is it's median family income. The people of Calgary and Edmonton are far richer(wealthier) than the people of Toronto, in general.

a cities economic power is determined by its GDP output. Obviously Toronto's is much higher than Calgary and Edmonton combined, but the family income of those cities far outpaces Toronto's or basically every other city in North America.
     
     
  #4190  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 3:48 PM
reidjr reidjr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,237
isaidso
Not everyone wants to live in condo some city's are more of house type city while other city's are more condo type markets.
     
     
  #4191  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 3:59 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Yeah, especially considering the cosmopolitan nature of Toronto's populace compared to the more conservative and European populace's of Calgary and Edmonton.
     
     
  #4192  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 4:06 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewjm3D View Post
What makes Toronto a poorer city? You seem to relate median household incomes with a cities wealth. If that's the case then you must think New York City is an extremely poor city compared to Edmonton. Edmonton can't build 200+ until they move their airport. No one can say for sure why Edmonton and even Calgary aren't building condos en-mas might just be down to the fact that the condo culture doesn't exist there yet.
Close airport... which is 1/2 way there already... and it is 150m.

Condo culture exists here, but just not on the scale of Toronto or Vancouver... or even Calgary. Housing is still affordable enough that many who might, dont for they can get into a house.
     
     
  #4193  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 4:35 PM
reidjr reidjr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Yeah, especially considering the cosmopolitan nature of Toronto's populace compared to the more conservative and European populace's of Calgary and Edmonton.
Even if you look at Ottawa while yes there are some nice high end condo's the real rich areas are places like Rockcliffe.
     
     
  #4194  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 5:51 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is online now
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,601
New Casa 2 rendering from BuzzBuzz - http://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/casa-ii-condos

     
     
  #4195  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 6:41 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
And here's 8 Eglinton:





World Achitecture News
     
     
  #4196  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 6:54 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is online now
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,601
wow that's huge for way up there
     
     
  #4197  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 7:01 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Leblanc View Post
wow that's huge for way up there
Indeed. Along with Eau du Soleil, we're starting to see a trend of 200+ metre towers appearing outside of Toronto's traditional downtown core (i.e. the CBD & Yorkville).

In fact, before this cycle, there were no 200+ metre towers in Yorkville or even north of Queen for that matter.

I wouldn't be surprised to see another big proposal pop up in North York or Mississauga before the cycle ends.
     
     
  #4198  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 9:03 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
that eglinton proposal is not the redesign requested by the city.

That design is dead on arrival.

the city is saying the towers are too similar and they don't like the overhang on the sidewalk.
     
     
  #4199  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 9:17 PM
Vertigo3000 Vertigo3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
that eglinton proposal is not the redesign requested by the city.

That design is dead on arrival.

the city is saying the towers are too similar and they don't like the overhang on the sidewalk.
What a shame
     
     
  #4200  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2012, 10:29 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
that eglinton proposal is not the redesign requested by the city.

That design is dead on arrival.

the city is saying the towers are too similar and they don't like the overhang on the sidewalk.
I thought Design Review Panel decisions weren't binding. Even if they are, I suspect that they'll make marginal changes but keep the general design in tact.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:48 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.