Quote:
Originally Posted by CorbeauNoir
I don't have any numbers in front of me but from what I recall the CFL generally wants something like ~25k seats for regular games and ~45+k for the Grey Cup. (ed.)
What I don't really understand is that the numbers are about the same for what FIFA is after for WWC-acceptable venues, and that is ostensibly what this prospective stadium is being built for in the first place. So why the hell is a 10k-seat stadium being suggested at all? I know that those parameters have been proposed for a while now but it still makes absolutely no sense to me. 
|
CorbeauNoir there is no visible long term tenant for a Stadium in the HRM and thus no business case at this time. The sensible first business is with the Fifa Womens Worlds but the 60 million dollar estimate may indeed be way too low. Kansas City recently completed a 20000 seat , all spectators under cover stadium for 200 million dollars. The Renderings presented at the public meetings for the HRM Stadium have two main grandstands with roofs covering the spectators.
Entertaining Fifa even for a womens tournament is a quick way to cost overruns. Chile in 2008 hosted the U 20 womens with four Stadia. Of four existing Stadia Three were completely torn down and rebuild with Roofing covering 100 percent of the spectators . The Fourth had to have extensive renovations to make the existing Roof go from covering 80 percent of the roof to 100 percent.Chile is at least 20 places back from Canada in size of economy.
Considering the Fifa Womens World coordinator Tatjana Haenni recently said in Ottawa that Edmonton's Commonwealth Stadium needed upgrades to host it really looks like a bad idea to entertain hosting Fifa. With Canada being the only country to hold up our hands for this tournament you would think the demands would be reserved from Fifa. Maybe what we have to do is start saying no to carpetbaggers like Fifa and the Commonwealth Games people.