HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    One World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #16901  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2011, 4:08 PM
CarlosV's Avatar
CarlosV CarlosV is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,820
Towering over Lower Manhattan!


DSC_3523 copy by Ceva321, on Flickr

.


DSC_3522 copy by Ceva321, on Flickr
     
     
  #16902  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2011, 5:04 PM
TBone7281 TBone7281 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 686
Quote:
Originally Posted by manchester united View Post
Will there be the glass in the lower part of the tower ( the first 57 meters ) ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Servo View Post
Yup. But, other than being told there will be "glass fins", we don't know for sure what the final design looks like for the base; it has yet to be unveiled.

We're confident it'll be good.
I think it was supposed to already be done but the glass material was custom and when they tested it certain properties of it failed so they are evaluating other options. (Specifically, when the glass was hit with a force significant to break it, large pieces of shrapnel came off, which they deemed to be unacceptable.)
     
     
  #16903  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2011, 7:32 PM
Kevin Scott Koepke Kevin Scott Koepke is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 252

lower manhattan; 10/8/2011 by kevin scott koepke photography, on Flickr

Do not repost, copy, or otherwise reproduce this image. Thank you.
     
     
  #16904  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2011, 7:46 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,117
My pictures of One World Trade Center from Brooklyn Bridge Park. I know they — because they came from my cellphone camera. At least it's a start. They were taken today so now most of you should know the building's current status.







     
     
  #16905  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2011, 8:24 PM
CarlosV's Avatar
CarlosV CarlosV is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,820
they dont —...I cant wait until the park is totally completed!
     
     
  #16907  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2011, 10:43 PM
KN.'s Avatar
KN. KN. is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 15


4WTC looks like another 7WTC from that vantage point.
     
     
  #16908  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2011, 10:44 PM
KN.'s Avatar
KN. KN. is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 15
Dusk in NYC 8th October 2011

Earthcam. World Trade Center Cams. http://www.earthcam.com/usa/newyork/worldtradecenter/?cam=tower1 . EarthCam, Inc
     
     
  #16909  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 2:55 AM
Servo's Avatar
Servo Servo is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by KN. View Post


4WTC looks like another 7WTC from that vantage point.
The two do oddly compliment each other.
     
     
  #16910  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 4:15 AM
Otie's Avatar
Otie Otie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 700
     
     
  #16911  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 4:41 AM
xnyr xnyr is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
They better put a restaurant and observatory up top because there is already WAYY too much empty space, no building, ANYWHERE needs 250 feet of mechanical space, maybe if it's 7000 feet tall, but this is not the case. Sears only has 80 or so feet of mech. space, the old WTC, maybe 50 or 60, many new supertalls, still such... .
Found this interesting rundown in Wikipedia - just to confuse the matter further....



These are examples of above-ground mechanical floor layouts for some of the world's tallest buildings. In each case, mechanical penthouses and spires are counted as floors, leading to higher total floor counts than usual.

Taipei 101: Floors 7–8, 17–18, 25–26, 34, 42, 50, 58, 66, 74, 82, 87, 90–91, and 102 in the penthouse (total 17/102, or 17%). The official count of 11 corresponds to the number of groups in the office section. Floors 92–100 contain "communications equipment"and so are not typically counted as mechanical since they do not service the building itself.

World Trade Center Twin Towers: Floors 7–8, 41–42, 75–76, and 108–109 (total 8/110, 7%).
The 110th Floor of 1 WTC (North Tower) housed television and radio transmission equipment. Some sources erroneously mention 12 floors, in groups of 3, due to the height of the vents (actually the ceilings there were higher) and because levels 44 and 78 were skylobbies which in many buildings sit directly on top of the mechanical floors. However the twin towers had one occupied office floor under each skylobby, accessible through escalators.

Willis Tower: Levels 30–31, 48–49, 64–65, 104–108, and 109–110 in the penthouse (total 13/110, 12%).

Petronas Towers: Floors 2–7, 38–40, 43, 84, 87–88 (total 13/88, 15%) (New York Times, Elevator World magazine)

Jin Mao Building: Floors 51–52, and 89–93 in the penthouse (total 7/93, 7.5%) (SkyscraperPage)

Burj Khalifa: Floors 17–18, 40–42, 73–75, 109–112, 136–138, 155, and 160–168 in the penthouse (total 25/168, 15%)"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_floor
     
     
  #16912  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 11:21 AM
QUEENSNYMAN QUEENSNYMAN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,292
     
     
  #16913  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 12:29 PM
CarlosV's Avatar
CarlosV CarlosV is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,820
Sunday October 9, 2011 8:20 am

the roofline should be where the tip of the tallest crane is right now


DSC_3543 copy by Ceva321, on Flickr

Last edited by CarlosV; Oct 9, 2011 at 12:43 PM.
     
     
  #16914  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 1:59 PM
Davidsam52 Davidsam52 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by PUSSY WILLOW View Post
the roofline should be where the tip of the tallest crane is right now


DSC_3543 copy by Ceva321, on Flickr
Looks like another stellar day in NYC, Carlos! Hopefully we'll see some new steel this week??
     
     
  #16915  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 3:59 PM
CarlosV's Avatar
CarlosV CarlosV is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidsam52 View Post
Looks like another stellar day in NYC, Carlos! Hopefully we'll see some new steel this week??
You got that right ! it is an amazing day! 70 degrees and sunny... more steel by tomorrow 7am i bet!

4 more floors of glass panels on the northeast side of the tower and it will surpass 7 WTC!!


.

* the airplane banner reads "Save Money Geico"

DSC_3544 copy by Ceva321, on Flickr
     
     
  #16916  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 4:27 PM
steveve's Avatar
steveve steveve is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,798
These are a week old, October 2, 2011, but here they are anyway,

• Video Link


• Video Link


• Video Link


• Video Link


• Video Link


• Video Link


And both 4WTC and 1WTC together,
• Video Link


• Video Link


• Video Link


by me: steveve
     
     
  #16917  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 6:03 PM
QUEENSNYMAN QUEENSNYMAN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,292
     
     
  #16918  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 6:10 PM
QUEENSNYMAN QUEENSNYMAN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,292
     
     
  #16919  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 7:09 PM
The Grand Architect's Avatar
The Grand Architect The Grand Architect is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 303
Haven't been on SSP in a while...

A few I made a week ago:





Some more here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWZzuCmsgik
     
     
  #16920  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2011, 8:15 PM
jd3189's Avatar
jd3189 jd3189 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
They better put a restaurant and observatory up top because there is already WAYY too much empty space, no building, ANYWHERE needs 250 feet of mechanical space, maybe if it's 7000 feet tall, but this is not the case. Sears only has 80 or so feet of mech. space, the old WTC, maybe 50 or 60, many new supertalls, still such...

I really think the new WTC may possible look good when completed but some aspects are just so pathetic and cowardly I can't help but get enraged by what we are replacing two of the most massive structures on earth with...



Ps. sorry for the rant... part of me really hates the new WTC still...
I agree. Those floors at the top are too large. This building is already strong enough for more floors in between the space. But if they have a good reason for that, I won't complain anymore.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:34 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.