HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2011, 10:31 AM
edluva edluva is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAofAnaheim View Post
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. LA cannot have decent/reasonable infill projects without a serious parking reform.
No, LA cannot have decent infill without serious transit improvements

Quote:
Does a restaurant opening on 7th street really need parking?
yes. extensive parking will always be required in some shape or form until transit becomes a substantively viable alternative to the car.

Quote:
Until we unbundle parking from developments; developers need additional incentives to build. So be it; if it's a special sign district or tax breaks. It's the parking!!!!!
Wrong. It's the transit.

until we have a functionally transit-accessible city, absurd parking ratios will be required, and therefore, developers will need additional incentives. It's the transit!!!!
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:21 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.