HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1881  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2011, 11:33 PM
LAofAnaheim LAofAnaheim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illithid Dude View Post
Chicago and Detroit both have various statues and monuments littered around downtown. Salt Lake City is known for elaborate fountains, which I would consider a monument.
Our Grand Civic Park will have a monumentous water fountain (which it already has, but will look more grand once the park is cleaner).
     
     
  #1882  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2011, 11:49 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illithid Dude View Post
Chicago and Detroit both have various statues and monuments littered around downtown. Salt Lake City is known for elaborate fountains, which I would consider a monument.
I have no idea which "monuments" you are talking about, but labeling them as such really is an insult to cities with true monuments that people actually care about.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
     
     
  #1883  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 12:05 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westsidelife View Post
I have no idea which "monuments" you are talking about, but labeling them as such really is an insult to cities with true monuments that people actually care about.
They have statues, fountains, things like that. Monuments. DC, Chicago, and Detroit were the three cities in the United States to participate the most in the City Beautiful movement, which was a movement to beautify downtowns with greenery and monuments. So yes, they have monuments. Sure, the statues in Chicago or Detroit aren't 500 foot tall obelisks, but even something in a more human scale is a monument.
     
     
  #1884  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 12:38 AM
bobcat bobcat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,790
I don't think I've ever been to any city of any significance that didn't have statues, fountains, and monuments.
     
     
  #1885  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 1:22 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illithid Dude View Post
They have statues, fountains, things like that. Monuments. DC, Chicago, and Detroit were the three cities in the United States to participate the most in the City Beautiful movement, which was a movement to beautify downtowns with greenery and monuments. So yes, they have monuments. Sure, the statues in Chicago or Detroit aren't 500 foot tall obelisks, but even something in a more human scale is a monument.
You're missing the point of my argument. I didn't ask if there were literally any other cities with monuments. I asked if there were any other cities with monuments that people actually care about -- monuments that alone make a city worth visiting. DC and NYC (only because of the Statue of Liberty) are the only two such cities.

No one goes to Chicago to see the Water Tower. It's a relatively unassuming structure that is completely overshadowed by the nearby JHC. In other words, it is not a must-see of Chicago. The Lincoln Memorial, on the other hand, is a must-see of DC; the Eiffel Tower is a must-see of Paris, etc.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
     
     
  #1886  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 1:26 AM
DistrictDirt's Avatar
DistrictDirt DistrictDirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobcat View Post
I don't think I've ever been to any city of any significance that didn't have statues, fountains, and monuments.
Having moved here from the American city with the most monuments, I can say that I don't think monuments are what make a "world class city". They're nice and all, but pretty much just because they create de facto park space. Statues and monuments are just one element out of hundreds that factor into good urban design, and good pedestrian experience. Its not essential.
__________________
Urbanize LA - Covering real estate development, architecture and urban planning in the Greater Los Angeles Area.

Please follow on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram
     
     
  #1887  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 3:11 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westsidelife View Post
You're missing the point of my argument. I didn't ask if there were literally any other cities with monuments. I asked if there were any other cities with monuments that people actually care about -- monuments that alone make a city worth visiting. DC and NYC (only because of the Statue of Liberty) are the only two such cities.

No one goes to Chicago to see the Water Tower. It's a relatively unassuming structure that is completely overshadowed by the nearby JHC. In other words, it is not a must-see of Chicago. The Lincoln Memorial, on the other hand, is a must-see of DC; the Eiffel Tower is a must-see of Paris, etc.
Well, you didn't say that! Anyways, now I suppose you are right. I don't think very many people would go to Chicago to look at the statues.
     
     
  #1888  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 3:33 AM
all of the trash all of the trash is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Koreatown
Posts: 181
Completely disagree with Districtdirt. Monuments and statues--really even just simple fountains--provide focal points for public spaces, identifiable landmarks for people to meet and gather around. They don't have to be impressive or tourist destinations, just some place you can come across walking around the city, a place to rest, catch some shade and people watch. Don't underestimate the use or value of such places in cities. All great cities have them. Los Angeles seems to have made at least *some* progress in all facets of urban development--rail lines, retail, restaurants, event centers--except for public spaces.
     
     
  #1889  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 4:27 AM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,066
Gee I dunno, St. Louis sure seems to have a pretty frickin' grand monument.
     
     
  #1890  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 4:37 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by StethJeff View Post
Gee I dunno, St. Louis sure seems to have a pretty frickin' grand monument.
Most people would have trouble just spotting St. Louis on a map.

Lincoln Memorial
Statue of Liberty
St. Louis Arch
Eiffel Tower
Coliseum

Which one doesn't belong?
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
     
     
  #1891  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 4:38 AM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,066
Although it isn't a monument, I'd say the Angel's Flight is one of the more unique examples of public art in a major U.S. downtown. I consider it just as much public art as a train or form of transportation. People already seem to enjoy watching the trains climb the hill. If done correctly with an ample plaza area around it (more than the space currently to the North of it) and dining space in view of it, Angel's Flight is a potential place to create a meeting area with something interesting to gaze at. Find a way to reconfigure Grand Central Market so that the Hill side is more open air with sidewalk seating and rip out La Cita. In fact, throw some money into Angel's Knoll and integrate it into the goat patch in order to turn it into a slightly terraced lawn for people to sit and eat alongside the rail.
     
     
  #1892  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 4:43 AM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,066
What about Wrigley Field? That's gotta be America's most famous memorial.
     
     
  #1893  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 4:51 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by StethJeff View Post
Although it isn't a monument, I'd say the Angel's Flight is one of the more unique examples of public art in a major U.S. downtown. I consider it just as much public art as a train or form of transportation. People already seem to enjoy watching the trains climb the hill. If done correctly with an ample plaza area around it (more than the space currently to the North of it) and dining space in view of it, Angel's Flight is a potential place to create a meeting area with something interesting to gaze at. Find a way to reconfigure Grand Central Market so that the Hill side is more open air with sidewalk seating and rip out La Cita. In fact, throw some money into Angel's Knoll and integrate it into the goat patch in order to turn it into a slightly terraced lawn for people to sit and eat alongside the rail.
I think turning Angels Knoll into a full-fledged park is a great idea. Right now, it is pretty nice, but it is a little barren. Add some trees, some bushes, a sculpture or two, and maybe a concession stand, and you've got yourself a full-fledged hang-out spot. I don't really like the over-designed modern parks we get nowadays. I think that the most simple parks are the ones that get used the most. Keep Angels Knoll simple, and it would be a real winner. Of course, most importantly, the area has to be built up for Angels Knoll to really be utilized. If I recall, Zen Tower was proposed right next to Angels Knoll, and that tower (I think) has a fairly good chance of being built. A double punch of awesome park and awesome tower would be amazing!
     
     
  #1894  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 6:13 AM
alki alki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by citywatch View Post
at the same time, alki, I can say that your believing good design---or just design per se----is the answer to what hurts some proj or area also is fanatical. And I don't even disagree with the notion that design is an important part of the whole. but it's only ONE part.

My pointing out all the parking lots also was to emphasize that the hood still doesn't have as much good housing as it could, or as it needs. I wasn't even focusing on those lots being a turn off to ppl who walk around or next to them & therefore won't be as enthusiastic about strolling around the hood in general.

there also are a few public areas in dt that are better designed & more inviting than Pershing Sq, but they aren't necessarily any more popular with ppl. Some have cited the small public space west of the entrance to the Central Library as an example of a nicely arranged space, which it is. But other than customers using the adjoining restaurant, I don't know if lots of ppl have been any more likely to gather----or hang out----around there than elsewhere. I won't point to the friendly looking grand hope park directly west of the Fashion Institute cuz urbanists can say that space isn't heavily used due to it being surrounded by a gate.
Brigham did a video when he was in NYC.........I can't remember if I saw it here or on his website but he was in a small park in Manhattan. There were a few people in the park but it hardly looked packed with people. During a work day, there are not a lot of people who can sit around a public park or square and contemplate their life. Given the number of people in Manhattan, Central Park ain't that busy during the week. On weekends, its a different story.

And then with PS, there was the problem with the homeless and the drug trafficking.....esp. at nite. It doesn't sound like that's completely gone. People get intimidated by that kind of stuff.

So yeah, more people living downtown may help fill DTLA's public spaces but maybe not as much as you might think.

My attitude about DTLA is make it as attractive as you would want your DT to be.....and they will come.

Quote:
Originally Posted by citywatch View Post
However, I was thinking about the new restaurant & lounge that opened recently on top of a bldg next to Pershing Sq. I was wondering how common or unique that particular type of setup is in other cities, esp where there are alot of highrises.

I was thinking how the owner will have a tough time being in the black during all the wks or months when it's wet or too cold. it then suddenly occurred to me that LA doesn't even have a fraction as many days of rain & really cold weather---much less snow---as cities like NY or chicago do. Even SF has enough fog & chilliness to make the idea of an outdoor rooftop restaurant & lounge not an easy sell, or ideal for profitability. So would the concept of the Perch restaurant do well in places that have weather similar to that of Seattle? Possibly. But if making enough $$ will go downward for the owner during times of rain & cold in LA, then it will be even tougher for businesses in cities without a Mediterranean type climate.
That new restaurant is fairly unique. It happens in other cities but not that frequently for a whole host of reasons. But yeah, LA's climate really lends itself to that type of restaurant as well as sidewalk cafes. That was the irony when I moved to LA. Here was this city with the perfect Mediterranean climate and it had hardly any sidewalk cafes. Of course, that changed while I lived there.

The only problem I see with that restaurant....and its really a minor problem.........is that it loses the advantage of drop in customers off the street. You are totally dependent on good word of mouth. As for the winter months, all you would need is an awning and heaters.
     
     
  #1895  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 6:19 AM
alki alki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAofAnaheim View Post
That's why I chose to live in downtown LA. If I wanted a well built-out city with a fantastic urban area, yeah, I would leave LA. But I wanted to be where change was happening. There's nothing more fun for a rail enthusiast and urban hopeful than to see an area experience a culture change.

I moved to downtown LA in 2007. At that time, there was no reasonable restaurant to get a meal in South Park/Financial District outside of Denny's, IHOP or the Pantry. I love seeing how even the smallest opening has made a tremendous change in downtown.
Yup. I definitely miss that aspect. Seattle is done......well not done....but the major changes have already taken place.

That goes to show you that no place is perfect.
     
     
  #1896  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 6:27 AM
alki alki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by sopas ej View Post
I know this is off topic, but this is what the roof of the Pacific Electric Building used to look like, back in 1910, when the Jonathan Club occupied the top floors:


LAPL

A postcard from 1909:

ebay[/SIZE]
Cool photos. They reminded me of a restaurant that grows a lot of its veggies on its roof here in Seattle. Cities need more greening of bldg roofs. They are wasted spaces.

Is the PE building still around?
     
     
  #1897  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 6:37 AM
alki alki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by citywatch View Post
pesto, if you can find a web site or pics of a restaurant or lounge in a cold weather city that goes against what laofanaheim is describing, it would be very interesting to me if you posted a link to it here. I'm not being argumentative, as I'd really be fascinated to read about a food service business that's dependent on good weather surviving in climates where alot more rain & cold, & certainly snow, exists on far more days each yr compared with LA....
That's not likely to happen. You might find the errant food service place outside a skating rink that is open air but there are few cities in the world with LA's benevolent climate. We have outdoor cafes here........and we would sit in weather much colder and wetter than Angelenos would endure. However, in the dead of the winter, the outdoor cafe portion is closed and customers sit indoors.
     
     
  #1898  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 7:23 AM
alki alki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by citywatch View Post
I've been going through the my city photos page & saw 3 different threads on SF. one of them highlights the union sq area.......
the main reason why I think Pershing sq & the hood overall doesn't connect the way it should, or isn't bustling the way it could? LA lost too much $$ a loong time ago, inc ppl who ran to the burbs. DT never had enough ppl & businesses with $$ to begin with, so when it fell apart over 50 yrs ago, it really fell apart.

Then too many slumlords or owners desperate to make a fast buck----& the type of ppl they feed off of----became the mainstay of DT.

I notice in pics of SF there are many old beaux arts bldgs that are in great shape, even sparkling clean & almost like new. I'm amazed at how few, or almost none of them (at least in pics) are decrepit & filthy the way so many old bldgs still are in LA, esp around broadway.
I think the problem with LA is that its not very urbane.........and before people jump on me....I mean the word as it was originally meant..........Angelenos are not all that familiar with urban living. They are sophisticated, edgy, creative, yada yada yadda, people........but city living in LA is different than in places like SF, Boston, NYC, etc.

People in those cities are less dependent on the car. They are used to walking to catch a bus or train.......walk to work and on the way back home, pick up their laundry or groceries or dinner. Its a whole different way of thinking.

In LA, you drive to go for a walk. Going to Old Pas or 3rd street in SM is like going to the movies........its an event. When you don't drive, your brain thinks differently. I bet district dirt knows what I mean. Its a whole different mindset. It could be why things haven't quite jelled yet in DTLA.

I think that's why LA urbanists are pushing for DTLA to come alive......so they can live the concept of urban living. FWIW.
     
     
  #1899  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 7:30 AM
alki alki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by LA/OCman View Post
As a native Angeleno, I am puzzled by the admonishment of the use of stucco. Yes, I understand the negativity toward that cheap stucco, taco bell finish but the use of smooth stucco is very popular is Italy, Greece, France and Spain. It goes back to the Renaissance days. Have you been to Venice? Sure, limestone is great but very expensive. Smooth stucco can give you some amazing and colorful buildings. I own a Spanish fourplex in Hollywood built in 1922 and my building looks great with a smooth stucco finish. The 717 Olympic Tower used it. What is the big deal? I think the architecture of the building is more important. It is cost effective and adapts well to our warm climate.
I agree with you. Some deco bldings were built with the smooth stucco. I really like it as a building material. Its the textured stucco that makes me nuts and invariably its painted pink. And it was used a lot in LA because its cheaper to apply.
     
     
  #1900  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2011, 7:39 AM
LosAngelesBeauty's Avatar
LosAngelesBeauty LosAngelesBeauty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by alki View Post
Brigham did a video when he was in NYC.........I can't remember if I saw it here or on his website but he was in a small park in Manhattan. There were a few people in the park but it hardly looked packed with people. During a work day, there are not a lot of people who can sit around a public park or square and contemplate their life. Given the number of people in Manhattan, Central Park ain't that busy during the week. On weekends, its a different story.

This video of Greeley Square correct?
__________________
DTLA Rising
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.