HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3081  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2011, 7:15 AM
whiteford's Avatar
whiteford whiteford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,526
now that's a sexy skyscraper. wow wee!!!!! there is not one un-beautiful thing about that delicious work of art. it could be built in Dubai and it would still stand out as a special tower. that is just too awesome to be true. quick everyone pray to the skyscraper gods for this one.
     
     
  #3082  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2011, 5:04 PM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 12,725
This is exactly what Edmonton needs. I've always regarded the city as an architectural wasteland despite liking the city a lot. This single tower will help erase that opinion. I'm really hoping this goes through.
     
     
  #3083  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2011, 5:11 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale View Post
That's what I'm hearing.
161m

Manu is 146m
Epcor is 149m
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #3084  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2011, 5:14 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by onishenko View Post
/\ Knock on wood. Nothing official announced yet.
True, but rumours have it essentially 100% pre-leased to prove govt and UofA school of business.

Yes, 2 tenants at ~ 300k each
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #3085  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2011, 8:16 PM
ue ue is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: WPG
Posts: 9,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo View Post
This is exactly what Edmonton needs. I've always regarded the city as an architectural wasteland despite liking the city a lot. This single tower will help erase that opinion. I'm really hoping this goes through.
I guess you haven't visited the Hotel MacDonald, Art Gallery of Alberta (new one), Whyte Ave between 103 and 105 Streets, Jasper Ave east of 97 Street until the Flatiron, 104 Street north of Jasper, the Legislature grounds, High Level Bridge, City Hall, McLeod Building. Though I agree, for high rises, this pretty much tops everything, even though Manulife, CN, and Commerce certainly aren't hard on the eyes.
     
     
  #3086  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2011, 1:30 AM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by ue View Post
I guess you haven't visited the Hotel MacDonald, Art Gallery of Alberta (new one), Whyte Ave between 103 and 105 Streets, Jasper Ave east of 97 Street until the Flatiron, 104 Street north of Jasper, the Legislature grounds, High Level Bridge, City Hall, McLeod Building. Though I agree, for high rises, this pretty much tops everything, even though Manulife, CN, and Commerce certainly aren't hard on the eyes.
Having lived in Edmonton on and off for 10 years now, I have to agree with giallo. Sure Edmonton has a handful of nice buildings, but the overwhelming majority of the city isn't particularly attractive. This isn't an insult, it's just the result of modern urban planning which is inevitably aesthetically shitty no matter where you go.
     
     
  #3087  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2011, 1:40 AM
Fog Ducker Fog Ducker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 49
Echo the sentiments above. For me, which is exactly why I hope that Manu 2 changes that trend for Edmonton!
     
     
  #3088  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2011, 3:06 AM
ue ue is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: WPG
Posts: 9,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim View Post
Having lived in Edmonton on and off for 10 years now, I have to agree with giallo. Sure Edmonton has a handful of nice buildings, but the overwhelming majority of the city isn't particularly attractive. This isn't an insult, it's just the result of modern urban planning which is inevitably aesthetically shitty no matter where you go.
Oh, I agree, the vast majority is uninteresting and dull. But I did want to point out not everything is "wasteland" material. There are nice areas here and there, like Strathcona, Glenora, Cloverdale, and The Highlands. Certain specific buildings right downtown (aforementioned AGA, City Hall, McLeod, Manulife, et al) aren't hard on the eyes either and there is the Victoria Promenade in Oliver. For gritty yet interesting areas there's Jasper from 97th to 96th as well as Little Italy and Chinatown on 97th north of 105 Ave. It's no Montreal, or even Winnipeg, but certainly isn't an entire wasteland.
     
     
  #3089  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2011, 3:23 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,067
The last 10 years have been all Toronto, with a bit of Calgary, Vancouver, and Montreal thrown in. Edmonton's our 6th biggest city, and one of our fastest growing. It's about time Edmonton joined the party and contributed to the skyscraper boom.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #3090  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2011, 3:42 AM
Dwils01's Avatar
Dwils01 Dwils01 is offline
Urban Fanactic
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 3,283
That Edmonton proposal is amazing.
     
     
  #3091  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2011, 6:06 PM
Vaillant Vaillant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montréal
Posts: 935
New Approved project for Montreal 25floors

from GDS on Mtlurb.com


     
     
  #3092  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2011, 6:27 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,918
^wow that's insane! Its approved? really? What are they condos?
     
     
  #3093  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2011, 8:40 PM
osmo osmo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,717
I really like that Montreal proposal and how they kept the old building intact, it meshes quite well! Hope it gets built!
     
     
  #3094  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2011, 8:55 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is online now
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,586

Last edited by Dylan Leblanc; Sep 29, 2011 at 1:22 AM.
     
     
  #3095  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2011, 9:56 PM
Tone's Avatar
Tone Tone is offline
Riki beach
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rimouski, Qc
Posts: 3,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaillant View Post
New Approved project for Montreal 25floors

from GDS on Mtlurb.com
Shits crazy! Sherbrooke street is becoming stronger and stronger and this will nicely expand the canyon eastward! Also reminds me of Quebecor's new tower.

All this developpement is unreal.
     
     
  #3096  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2011, 10:17 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,918
^true for Sherbrooke. Same for bleury, in the last few years bleury has had:
-the Westin 21 floors
-1009 20 floors
-Southam 14 floors
-the new Marriott 40 floors (u/c)
-maison hantee 17 floors (proposal)

And now this! Not too bad!
     
     
  #3097  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2011, 10:30 PM
Tone's Avatar
Tone Tone is offline
Riki beach
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rimouski, Qc
Posts: 3,437
^You forgot the latest: Louis Bohème 28 floors. (as seen on the background left)
     
     
  #3098  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2011, 10:36 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,918
I knew I forgot one. Of course! Louis boheme, ugly but 28 floors nonetheless! I remember when it was first approved, back in the days when 28 floors in Montreal was the highest new construction imaginable.
     
     
  #3099  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2011, 11:07 PM
Nicko999's Avatar
Nicko999 Nicko999 is offline
Go Chiefs!
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 20,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaillant View Post
New Approved project for Montreal 25floors

from GDS on Mtlurb.com


Nice, but couldn't they make it 35 instead of 25?
     
     
  #3100  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2011, 4:02 AM
armorand93's Avatar
armorand93 armorand93 is offline
Transit Nerd
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Calgary (former Winnipegger)
Posts: 2,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaillant View Post
New Approved project for Montreal 25floors

from GDS on Mtlurb.com


Is it just me, or does this have an resemblance to the planned ALT/Stantec building in Winnipeg?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:19 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.