HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3301  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2011, 4:53 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
First one has to decide what 17th SE should become. Do we want 'transit city' (for lack of a better term) style LRT on it, short trains, reasonably frequent, small frequent stations, no grade seperation. Or do we want mass rapid transit like the LRT lines we have built so far.

I don't think interlining a transit city style system with a mass rapid system would be very smart, and I am not sure you would generate enough ridership if mass rapid given the proximety of the SE and NE LRT lines which limit the catchment area, and ensure many of the 'new' riders on such a line will just be displaced from existing LRT.

All that being said in 40 years when we might be in a position to build a service such as this, things may have changed a great deal.
Good points. I think 17th Avenue SE would function well as a low-floor "urban LRT" type system that is not grade separated. So, you are right that this won't mesh well with a fully grade separated SE/NC LRT. Timing would be difficult. Not impossible though. Signal control and reducing the number of cross intersections to perhaps just 28th, 33rd, 36th, 40th, 44th, and 52nd could help. A Barcelona-style low-floor tram, as they have on Avinguda Diagonal, might work. There are definitely constraints, but it won't be impossible.

If you kept longer train consists, frequency would be reduced, but you could probably run 12 trains on 17th and 25+ trains to the SE which would be enough to cover capacity demands. (25 trains x 900 passengers/train x 2 hours peak flow = 45K, which is 50% of the catchment area for the SE and 12 x 900 x 2 = 22K, which is 40% of the GFL catchment area). That would leave 37 trains for the NC LRT (67K, or 44% of the NC catchment area). Those numbers seem reasonable to me. But it is all a matter of operations. Could you run 12 cars down 17th per hour with no grade separation? I don't know enough to answer that.
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
     
     
  #3302  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2011, 5:19 PM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is offline
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need A Thneed View Post
Three finalists for the CT smart card are:

Connect
Range
Energy
I liked Range the most considering multiple meanings which include space or extent included which might help users reflect on how they use the overall system, also is a subtle reference to the natural ecological environment, as well as mathematics.

The other ones didn't have any brand value for me...
     
     
  #3303  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2011, 10:05 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Here and There
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,807
The south LRT line needs some serious improvement between downtown and heritage.........and a few more condos . That area is the most under-utilized area of the C-train in all of the city in terms of people around and condo options. There is so much potential around the stanley park area.


Edit: I think there is a little bit of an urban renewal happening around the area between stanley park and heritage station. Good to see.
__________________
Renfrew, Calgary, Alberta.

Last edited by kw5150; Jul 6, 2011 at 10:38 PM.
     
     
  #3304  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2011, 10:38 PM
suburb suburb is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 945
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
Based on the 2010 census, I calculated the population of Northern Hills to be 47K. The remainder of the NCLRT would be around another 108K.

The SELRT, by comparison, would have 24K people north of Deerfoot (Inglewood, Ramsay, Ogden and Riverbend) and 67K south of Deerfoot (basically all of Ward 12). So in terms of total population, the NCLRT would actually have more of a potential catchment base (~150K to ~90K). So in terms of ridership and need for capacity, it is totally reasonable to expect the NCLRT to actually be greater than the SELRT. Although the SELRT has the hospital and Foothills Industrial, this would generate counter flow, or at least ridership that is not destined for downtown.

With this, maybe it actually does make sense to interline the SELRT with an international avenue LRT, whose catchment would be the Greater Forest Lawn area (population ~55K). That balances out the populations between the NCLRT and the combined SELRT and Greater Forest Lawn LRT (I am going to call it the GFL LRT for now).

Just throwing out ideas again, but perhaps this makes sense. We build a single tunnel through downtown, and get three lines out of it. Plus it makes transfers a lot easier.

Thoughts?
It is relatively easy for the Forest Lawn folks to get into the core. An additional point, however, would be the numbers in the different areas that actually need to get to the core, relative to lets say Foothills industrial. Sit on a 301 in rush hour and see the cars at North Pointe and you'll see the need pretty quick! As an aside however, I do want to reiterate that the main annoyance was the suggestion to go to Chestermere before North Pointe!
     
     
  #3305  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2011, 11:01 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburb View Post
It is relatively easy for the Forest Lawn folks to get into the core. An additional point, however, would be the numbers in the different areas that actually need to get to the core, relative to lets say Foothills industrial. Sit on a 301 in rush hour and see the cars at North Pointe and you'll see the need pretty quick! As an aside however, I do want to reiterate that the main annoyance was the suggestion to go to Chestermere before North Pointe!
True about Forest Lawn's access to the core. But like all things, it can be improved. Don't North Hills also have good access into the core via the 301? Building rail transit is about increasing speed, increasing capacity and reducing operating costs.

Either way, after the West LRT is built, that leaves essentially the SE (east of Deerfoot and south of Peigan), North Central (I would say everything between 14th street and Deerfoot and north of Downtown), Greater Forest Lawn (South of Memorial, East of Deerfoot and North of Peigan), the inner SW (east of Crowchild and south of 17th) and Bowness/Montgomery as areas that do not have rapid transit to the downtown. Do all of these areas need rapid transit? Probably not, but in terms of priority I would put it like this:

1. South East (90K residents, but more importantly jobs in Foothills, Manchester and South Hospital)
2. North Central (150K residents and future jobs in Stoney Industrial)
3. Greater Forest Lawn (55K residents)
4. Inner SW (about 30K residents)
5. Bowness/Montgomery/Parkdale/West Hillhurst (about 25K residents)
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
     
     
  #3306  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2011, 11:13 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,162
So I took the Airport bus today, the 17th ave and centre st North stop is about a 15 min walk from my house.

- it was damned hot out, kind if wish they had some sort of bus shelter for shade (the stop is shared by the 301 so it's not really temporary).

- trip went pretty quick, so no complaints there

- there were about 8 people on the bus, all went the airport, and a 9th got on near 64th ave. I'd say it was 2/3 people taking flights, 1/3 employees.

- compared to say the Canada Line in Vancouver, it's obviously not as smooth, climate controlled, with an LRT you don't have to worry about the bus lurching forward when you've only got 5 ft into the bus (and with 2 bags in your hands).

All in all though I liked it and would take it again. Taking a cab is min $50 round trip with tip, sometimes more, vs $11 round trip for the bus, that extra $40 buys a lot of Bud Lime**




** just kidding I don't drink that swill.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
     
     
  #3307  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2011, 11:36 PM
Bassic Lab Bassic Lab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
First one has to decide what 17th SE should become. Do we want 'transit city' (for lack of a better term) style LRT on it, short trains, reasonably frequent, small frequent stations, no grade seperation. Or do we want mass rapid transit like the LRT lines we have built so far.

I don't think interlining a transit city style system with a mass rapid system would be very smart, and I am not sure you would generate enough ridership if mass rapid given the proximety of the SE and NE LRT lines which limit the catchment area, and ensure many of the 'new' riders on such a line will just be displaced from existing LRT.

All that being said in 40 years when we might be in a position to build a service such as this, things may have changed a great deal.
I would really hope that the time table would be closer to 25 years as opposed to 40. I think an East LRT ought to be on the wish list right behind the SELRT, NLRT, and 8 Ave Subway as far as transit projects go. We really ought to have that started by 2030. Calgary Transit really doesn't need to start another 90s in 2015.

I don't think an International Avenue LRT would eat into the SELRT catchment area much if at all. As long as the line either interlines with the SELRT to enter downtown (which I do not personally favour) or requires a transfer to the SELRT/SLRT to enter downtown (which I do favour) then it will not cannibalize riders in Inglewood. The area east of Deerfoot is also well out of the SELRT catchment area. There would be some overlap with the NELRT, particularly west of 36 St E and north of 17 Ave S, but I don't think that a bit of overlap is necessarily a bad thing.

One thing in favour of a more mass transit like line would be the section west of 26 St SE. Whether the line goes downtown on its own, interlines with the SE, or requires a transfer at Inglewood/Ramsay Station or Crossroads and Erlton Stations, it will require elevation west of 26 St. Hell, 17 Ave/Blackfoot Trail is essentially elevated west of there and any LRT would need to do likewise. We might as well continue that elevated section for another 2.5 kilometres, at a differential cost of likely well under 100 million (given a per kilometre cost, including track and stations, of 25 million for surface and 50 million for elevated), allowing us to reach east of 52 St. That way the line can support mass transit if it needs to, the Forest Lawn street grid can be maintained without creating a wall down the middle like 36 St on the NELRT, and a higher speed can be used to allow fewer LRV consists to service the line.
     
     
  #3308  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 12:24 AM
suburb suburb is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 945
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
Bowness/Montgomery as areas that do not have rapid transit to the downtown.
Bowness / International Ave BRT 305:
http://www.calgarytransit.com/route_maps/rte305.html



Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
in terms of priority I would put it like this:

1. South East (90K residents, but more importantly jobs in Foothills, Manchester and South Hospital)
2. North Central (150K residents and future jobs in Stoney Industrial)
3. Greater Forest Lawn (55K residents)
4. Inner SW (about 30K residents)
5. Bowness/Montgomery/Parkdale/West Hillhurst (about 25K residents)
Generally agree with the priority setting in that - though I think a gondola to the foothills hospital and children's hospital may sneak into position 2.5
     
     
  #3309  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 12:35 AM
Bassic Lab Bassic Lab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburb View Post
It is relatively easy for the Forest Lawn folks to get into the core. An additional point, however, would be the numbers in the different areas that actually need to get to the core, relative to lets say Foothills industrial. Sit on a 301 in rush hour and see the cars at North Pointe and you'll see the need pretty quick! As an aside however, I do want to reiterate that the main annoyance was the suggestion to go to Chestermere before North Pointe!
I think some people might be overstating the case of downtown=middle class office jobs=residents of the west side and Forest Lawn=working class industrial jobs=Foothills Industrial. There are an awful lot of service jobs in the core, be it cleaning, food service, or retail. Those workers are far less likely to drive into the core or in general.

I would also imagine that counter flow commuting will become a much bigger deal as more lines open up. The more lines that open the more job centres there are that become a single train-train transfer for more people. If we built an East LRT with transfer stations between the SELRT at Crossroads and the SLRT at Erlton there would be a lot of mobility opportunities for the more marginalized residents of this city. Hell, redeveloped dense apartments on 17 Ave would be a simple walk-train-train-walk trip to employment areas as diverse as downtown, Chinook Centre Mall/west Manchester, the Southland office park, South Centre Mall, Highfield industrial, the Quarry Park office park, and the new SE Hospital/associated office parks. That kind of mobility could really help Forest Lawn turn into a more desirable mixed income neighbourhood whereas today its best hope involves maintaining the current predicament while its worst involves a slide down as gentrification in inner city areas west of Deerfoot push crime into the area.

I would agree that a transit wish list, with money as no object, would go something like this:

1) 2 St and 8 Ave subways downtown. The former is required for either the SE or the N LRT and we might as well do it all at once since they will be crossing over each other.
2) N LRT as Centre Street Subway. It has the biggest population of any unserved area and the best opportunity for redevelopment.
3) SE LRT as part of the N LRT's line. It has the second biggest population and is relatively close to major job centres both existing, Foothills Industrial, and planned, SE Hospital.
4) East LRT along International Avenue. It has a relatively large population, is relatively distant from other lines and has probably the second best opportunity for redevelopment.
5) a toss up between other lines such as: a 16 Ave N Crosstown (serving the inner city north, Bowness/Montgomery, and various connections), a 14 St W Crosstown (serving the inner city west, Rockyview Hospital, SAIT, and relieving other lines), something to serve Marda Loop and Mount Royal University, a 96 Ave link between the N LRT and NE LRT serving the Airport, an inner circle line (connecting various job centres and promoting connections between existing lines), and various spurs.

The problem with number 2, the Centre Street Subway, is how expensive it is. I think that easily moves it down past at least the SE LRT. It is probably still above number 4, unless the cost is really obscene, and definitely above an extension of that line to Chestermere. I don't think anyone was suggesting otherwise. The thing is the Northern Hills communities, taken alone, would be pretty low on the list. It is only the large population and excellent development opportunities along Centre Street that move it so high. Also everything under number 5 is a long ways off and may be served better by BRT instead of anything rail based; if that is the case they might move up because a BRT can be done for quite cheap if existing lane capacity can be utilized.
     
     
  #3310  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 12:48 AM
suburb suburb is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 945
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassic Lab View Post
I think some people might be overstating the case of <snip> Forest Lawn=working class industrial jobs=Foothills Industrial. There are an awful lot of service jobs in the core, be it cleaning, food service, or retail.
Hmmm ... uncomfortable silence.
     
     
  #3311  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 1:13 AM
Bassic Lab Bassic Lab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburb View Post
Hmmm ... uncomfortable silence.
I'm not saying that everyone who lives in Forest Lawn is the working poor. I am simply disagreeing with the notion some people seem to be implying that poorer neighbourhoods don't have people working downtown. The service jobs I outlined wouldn't be the only occupations that residents of Forest Lawn would have in the core; they were merely examples of possible jobs that the working poor, the most transit dependant Calgarians, might have in downtown.
     
     
  #3312  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 1:26 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by suburb View Post
Bowness / International Ave BRT 305:
http://www.calgarytransit.com/route_maps/rte305.html
I said rapid transit, not express transit. The 305 is not rapid transit. In fact, I think it averages a speed of 29km/hour. I meant either LRT lines, or BRTs with dedicated lanes (which we have none of).
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
     
     
  #3313  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 1:30 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,625
That is pretty fast, only a couple km/h lower than Toronto subway speed. At that speed with relatively little investment, unless capacity issues crop up it makes little sense to invest in anything more than debottlenecking the current route as problems arise.
     
     
  #3314  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 3:19 PM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is offline
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,450
One of the things I was thinking about the East LRT is that it would be a good idea to do an alignment study, and perform a master plan for the route along the way to Chestermere. From what I could tell, Chestermere and Calgary already have lands directly adjacent to one another that are anexxed. IMO, it would be less expensive to have a master plan in place, and potentially securing right of way now instead of waiting until everything is developed and have very limited and only very expensive options.

East LRT is a long way away from happening, but if alignment isn't set aside now it will screw over long term potential for the region. My other point is that there seems to be a clear consensus that the route should run along International Avenue. I think this point alone would make doing an alignment study much easier.
     
     
  #3315  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 3:44 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,625
Was it just the BRZ or was there an ARP for 17 SE that codified eventual reserved lanes for transit? And besides utility relocation does it really matter? I think 17 SE has really generous road expansion setbacks already no?

Last edited by MalcolmTucker; Jul 7, 2011 at 3:56 PM.
     
     
  #3316  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 3:47 PM
5seconds 5seconds is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 935
I agree about setting aside the proper alignments well before they are needed. They can always be sold off later if the need for the alignment never materializes, but the reverse is so much more painful for everyone involved.
     
     
  #3317  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 4:52 PM
Bassic Lab Bassic Lab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
Was it just the BRZ or was there an ARP for 17 SE that codified eventual reserved lanes for transit? And besides utility relocation does it really matter? I think 17 SE has really generous road expansion setbacks already no?
17 Ave SE does have incredibly generous setbacks, at least within the city. The road would need to be rebuilt completely but half the point, whether it is elevated to avoid disrupting the frequent intersections or not, would be to improve the public realm so as to prime 17 Ave for redevelopment. It really shouldn't be very difficult to reserve a ROW in the median of the, currently, rural section whenever it is twinned. Chestermere itself seems to also have plenty of room around the road. The bridge over the lake would likely need work if the ROW were to continue along the 1A but that shouldn't be too difficult. There might even be enough room under the Highway 1 overpass to add to new lanes by removing the berms.

Basically, finding space for the ROW would be at the absolute bottom of any list of issues that could conceivably arise from such a project. There would really only be two issues that could come up. The first would be funding. The second would be the disruption to the area between 26 St and 52 St, either shadowing concerns from elevated tracks/stations or the closing of intersections/barrier between north and south sides from a surface route. The ROW pretty well exists solely because of abandoned road expansion plans. That ought to minimize costs and community opposition were we to ever build an LRT through.
     
     
  #3318  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 6:56 PM
MichaelS's Avatar
MichaelS MichaelS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
Was it just the BRZ or was there an ARP for 17 SE that codified eventual reserved lanes for transit? And besides utility relocation does it really matter? I think 17 SE has really generous road expansion setbacks already no?
Not a full ARP, but a land use and Urban Design Concept:
http://www.calgary.ca/docgallery/bu/plan...ridor/se_seventeen_ave_corridor_plan.pdf
     
     
  #3319  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2011, 2:59 PM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 10,083
According to a story on Global last night all stations outside the downtown are now equipped with at least 1 Ticket Vending Machine with a credit card reader, and in a couple weeks time they'll also be able to take debit card payments (waiting on something on the banks end of things from how they described it).
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
     
     
  #3320  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2011, 4:59 PM
polishavenger polishavenger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by mersar View Post
According to a story on Global last night all stations outside the downtown are now equipped with at least 1 Ticket Vending Machine with a credit card reader, and in a couple weeks time they'll also be able to take debit card payments (waiting on something on the banks end of things from how they described it).
Its amazing how behind the times Calgary transit is. We should have had a transit pass card, ticket vending machines equiped with credit and debit payment options, and real time transit info a decade ago.

I also hope that someone at CT has also finally clued in to the fact that the garbage cans at Vic park station need to be emptied more than the usual once a month during Stampede. Last time I was there during stampede, they were overflowing and the station looked very ghetto, not the image we want for the hundereds of thousands of people to take home with them.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:50 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.