HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1781  
Old Posted May 31, 2011, 2:15 AM
SpikePhanta SpikePhanta is offline
Vancouverite
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I think the area between the two malls is technically a City street, so building below it wold require an easement.
The Alley way no longer exists in between the two malls, it's a building with loading docks.

(unless you're talking about StationSquare and metropolis, Metropolis has an entrance that cuts through station square in the middle, to access their UP
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1782  
Old Posted May 31, 2011, 2:20 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,691
I was thnking of the area between the Former Eaton Centre Metrotown and the former Metrotown Centre.

I think the access through Station Square is defineitely a street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1783  
Old Posted May 31, 2011, 2:26 AM
SpikePhanta SpikePhanta is offline
Vancouverite
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I was thnking of the area between the Former Eaton Centre Metrotown and the former Metrotown Centre.

I think the access through Station Square is defineitely a street.
You mean this, http://maps.google.com/maps?q=metrotown&...tLstSVvr-Njf-JmOSiw&cbp=12,45.65,,0,4.41
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=metrotown&...n1vfYuwXV5hmrIZjqVGcQ&cbp=12,217.31,,0,0

Google Maps has it as a road type thing but you can't drive through it anymore like in the past
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1784  
Old Posted May 31, 2011, 3:04 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,691
Yeah, that's the one - guess it's not really a road then
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1785  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2011, 9:35 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,063
Opposition towers over proposal

Coquitlam council dismayed over lack of awareness on consultation process

By John Kurucz, Coquitlam NOW June 1, 2011


The Beedie Group proposed a 24-storey tower at the corner of Austin and Blue Mountain, which drew the ire of residents Monday.
Photograph by: Photo submitted, for the NOW


On Monday, the residents expressed their frustrations. On Tuesday, it was council's turn.

The issue of a 24-storey tower in the Austin Heights neighbourhood was the subject of ardent opposition at a public hearing Monday night, one that saw the Coquitlam council chambers over capacity.

The Beedie Group proposed to build at the corner of Austin Avenue and Blue Mountain Street a 24-storey tower, a facility that would have included 168 units, 12,000 square feet of common amenities and three at-grade commercial units.

Given the public outcry Monday, the issue was ultimately referred back to staff to try and find a middle ground between the local opposition and the developer's plans for the site.

The majority of those in attendance Monday claimed that the height was too much to reconcile, while others accused council of not notifying the public of the proposed facility.

The latter point left Coquitlam Mayor Richard Stewart bewildered in an interview with The NOW on Tuesday, as he noted that planning for the redevelopment of the entire Austin Heights area has been in the works for close to three years.

"I was surprised at the number of people who said, despite dozens of newsletters, newspaper stories and everything else, that they hadn't heard anything about this enormous process that's been going on for three years," he said.

"It's an eye-opener, it's a little bit frustrating and a bit discouraging. We've got work to do."

About 50 people spoke to the proposal Monday night -- with about three quarters voicing opposition -- and the evening's proceedings wrapped up shortly after midnight Tuesday morning.

Coun. Mae Reid, chair of the city's land use committee, echoed Stewart's sentiments in an interview Tuesday, saying that dozens of public input opportunities prior to Monday night came back in favour of some type of high- or mid-rise buildings being built in the area.

One of the more recent public input sessions took place on April 14 at the Vancouver Golf Club. That event was attended by 140 people and 78 comment forms were submitted. Of those, 52 people supported the Beedie proposal, 16 opposed the idea and 10 were undecided.

"Most people want to see redevelopment, some don't and some never want change. Change is hard and I understand that. But there comes a point where you have to redevelop. Highrises were a part of all these meetings," Reid said.

...

Read more: http://www.thenownews.com/news/Opposition+towers+over+proposal/4873930/story.html#ixzz1O9nErAPK
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1786  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2011, 1:31 AM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
^Well, as someone familiar with the area, all I can say is that the residents will get what they deserve if council bends over to the pressure during this electoral "silly season." It's painful to see, but ultimately they'll be the ones stuck with a significant arterial consisting exclusively of 1 and 2 story commercial buildings occupied by drycleaners and dental offices.

The Austin Heights neighborhood plan calls for a "2-4 story streetwall punctuated by highrise towers", and is filled with colorful drawings of towers populating Austin and pictures of other (even taller) Tri-City towers. I find it hard to believe that all these residents were totally ignorant of the 3-year process to develop this plan, and are the type likely to charge about public processes being "railroaded" regardless of the amount of open-houses, public hearings, etc. given to them to display their height phobias. A situation similar to that of the Cambie Corridor really.

On another note, I'm a huge fan of the design of this tower. If built, it would easily be the nicest in the Tri-Cities (and much better than some of the garbage in downtown), which is surprising given the location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1787  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2011, 3:13 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Sorta wished every other city administration was that defensive of their development plans =O
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1788  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2011, 5:43 PM
privatejet's Avatar
privatejet privatejet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,186
Burnaby Safeway Site

Canada Safeway Limited is marketing a 42-acre property in the Vancouver area that is close to major transportation and transit hubs, shopping and schools, and is designated as multi-family in the Edmonds area Official Community Plan.

The unique site is one of the largest undeveloped pieces of urban land with multi-family potential in Southwestern British Columbia, which includes Vancouver and its nearby suburbs. The property offers a compelling opportunity to developers interested in building large-scale multi-family housing in the fast-growing Burnaby area and to investment funds looking for significant exposure to the strong, stable and rewarding Canadian urban market.

The accessible site offers developers the opportunity to create a comprehensive neighborhood with a multi-family residential focus and some local retail and services. While the City of Burnaby has designated the property as multi-family residential in its Official Community Plan, municipal approvals for allowable densities and final development plans will be the responsibility of the successful purchaser. Currently, the property is zoned industrial, in keeping with its prior use as a distribution centre. This site offers the opportunity for development of apartments, townhouses or luxury penthouses that would have mountain and city views.

The development site, bounded by 11th Avenue and 14th Avenue and 15th Street and 18th Street in Burnaby, was formerly Safeway’s Distribution Centre. Canada Safeway will continue to operate a milk plant adjacent to the site, as it supplies a significant portion of the milk for the Lower Mainland.


http://safewayrealtyholdings.listinglab.com/BurnabyRedevelopmentProject/index.cfm

There is some rendering of a proposed concept plan in the dd package. Approx 3600 units.

Last edited by privatejet; Jun 4, 2011 at 5:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1789  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2011, 6:09 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,063
there's a whole new office/industrial complex in burnaby - lake city way area - near the sears warehouse - used to be a big empty space for years, was surprised to see it was all complete only last fall it was a sign
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1790  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2011, 7:03 AM
Xrayal's Avatar
Xrayal Xrayal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 174
125 Columbia St.

Found these plans in the new west city council minutes.
Note the Sapperton SkyTrain tunnel beneath the building.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1791  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 6:33 AM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,694
Quote:
Safeway’s proposed towers don’t jibe with Burnaby vision
Council says highrise marketing ‘not consistent’ with city’s low-rise plan
By Brian Morton, Vancouver Sun June 23, 2011


METRO VANCOUVER -- Canada Safeway is marketing a prime 17-hectare Burnaby property for multi-family residential development that includes highrise buildings, despite the city’s assertion that no towers can be built on the site.

Burnaby council issued a statement saying that Safeway’s vision for the land — which includes seven highrise buildings, according to a conceptual drawing it drew up for potential buyers — is not in line with the city’s vision, which is low-rise residential development of four storeys or less.

A Safeway release said it “offers the opportunity for development of apartments, townhouses or luxury penthouses that would have mountain and city views.”

The development site, bordered by 11th Avenue and 14th Avenue, and 15th Street and 18th Street in Burnaby, was formerly Safeway’s distribution centre. It was operated by a contractor but closed last year, putting nearly 400 people out of work.

According to Safeway, the property — zoned industrial but designated in 1994 as multi-family residential in the Edmonds Area Official Community Plan — is close to major transportation and transit hubs, shopping and schools, and is one of the largest undeveloped pieces of urban land with multi-family potential in southwestern B.C.

Estimates suggest there is potential to develop up to 1,500 residential units on the property.

Safeway has not put a price on the property but says BC Assessment has valued it at $81.5 million in its current industrial use. Safeway also said there has been considerable interest from both national and international developers.
Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Saf...+vision/4997250/story.html#ixzz1QAlSMoQd
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1792  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 7:01 AM
SpikePhanta SpikePhanta is offline
Vancouverite
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,483
That's too bad ^
It could really boost the neighbourhood to add some Offices, Retail and basically a new HighGate/neighbourhood area, with public amenities.

But sadly this could have become more of the typical bs "towers in the park" or "city in the park" similar to the area south of Edmonds station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1793  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2011, 9:15 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is offline
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,582
Chancellor in Burnaby by Polygon

DB entry - http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=93638


Chancellor - Rendering by Polygon Homes, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1794  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 2:48 AM
cc85 cc85 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Island City
Posts: 451
/\ kinda ugly
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1795  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 3:04 AM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
Nice to finally see a proper rendering of Chancellor, but this is quite major the letdown for something so tall - especially when compared to nearby Metroplace, The Sovereign, and Jewel towers. It seems like someone got lazy and just stretched plans for a 22 story tower from 2002.

Anyway, here are some updates from Coquitlam Centre and Downtown Poco:

Commercial building of Oasis and Grand Central 2


MOne


The Parc Residences (tower completed a few years back)


The Shaugnessy (Poco)


Assorted Poco lowrise projects




That final lowrise drives me nuts. From every angle it looks like something a child would draw - form is just a box, tacky colors, and horrendously cheap cladding.

Last edited by BodomReaper; Jun 25, 2011 at 4:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1796  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 3:53 AM
bardak bardak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 370
So in Burnaby we have yet another crappy tower in the park. Meanwhile in the tri-cities we have decent towers that actualy interact with street
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1797  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 6:26 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,063
coquitlam is trying to create a downtown it has never had so its trying harder

I don't mind the burnaby tower i don't get what people on this board are looking for
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1798  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 6:50 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is offline
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,582
Here's another Coquitlam one, M2.


http://www.vancouver-real-estate-direct.com/buzz/2011/03/coquitlam-mtwo-condos/


One for New Westminster, 125 Columbia. This would be built directly in front of that octagonal tower overlooking the river.


Residents voice concerns as public hearing for 125 Columbia Street looms - http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/123868224.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1799  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 9:20 PM
smho smho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Concord Pacific is moving ahead with it's tower next to Metrotown on Nelson/Dunblane Ave. Looks like it'll be called The Met. Site isn't live yet but it'll be

http://www.themetburnaby.com/

It consists of some townhomes and a 19 storey tower for a total of 147units, for those that don't remember officedwellers original post.
Looks like they're increasing the height to 35 storeys.
http://burnaby.fileprosite.com/Documents/DocumentList.aspx?ID=11487
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1800  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2011, 2:12 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc85 View Post
/\ kinda ugly

Bland, stereotypical, characterless, and typically Vancouver suburban blaaa is how I'd describe it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:25 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.