Wow cool, I'll be flying out to Boston by way of Winnipeg (don't ask) and Toronto that morning...
"All the crazy R&D going on now to figure out ways to make the oilsands more profitable and more environmentally friendly will pay dividends in industries we don't even know are remotely related right now."
Hehe, I always get a chuckle reading the hype over 'nanotech' (i.e: what used to be called chemistry and applied physics) etc in these Edmonton forums... I work with the Canada Research Chair for Oilsands Innovation (or whatever it is called), who moved here from Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee last year. His work focuses on nanomechanical cantilevers and other fine things. Actually their group is quite diverse, from nanofabrication to biomedical applications, but yes if there is enough time, maybe there will be an 'innovation' to improve upon the gross inefficiency of oilsands extraction.
There was a change in the head of the NRC, appointed by the Conservative government just before the election. He is essentially a businessman from Calgary, and has what seems to be no science or engineering experience whatsoever. His mandate is to orient the NRC to maximize tech commercialization and business startups. So, this may get your juices flowing...although I am not sure exactly how that may be done. It appears the current Director General of NINT, Nils Petersen, who is a chemist and basic scientist, is being pushed out - possibly in favour of a new business douche as DG that has no understanding of how 'innovation' and 'discovery' actually happens... Suffice to say, I'm not hugely confident that Edmonton will be the nanotech hub you all think it will. The top-down mediation and focus on "tech commercialization" ironically kills creativity, the kind of stuff that actually makes a place like Silicon Valley great. And that's why our tech spin-offs, something like our flagship nanotech spinoff Micralyne, are fairly boring companies. Finally, a troubling new caustic attitude towards basic science research in our country, amongst our national science organizations, will probably inhibit us and lessen our chances to invent, develop or discover something really cool. Everybody knows it's the basic science stuff, that seems pointless and meandering to some, that is the real engine in technology. One only needs to look as far as just before the founding of Google, and the work done on the page-rank algorithm by Sergey Brin...combined with the plucky interest of Larry Page to see something tangible and useful in it, then apply it (i.e: creative thinking, no pressure to do "tech commercialization").
Anyways, I'm totally ranting. I figure this is as good a place as any to do so!