HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #781  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 2:09 PM
themaguffin themaguffin is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,311
Quote:
I'm just curious as to why this page is all about Chicago & the Census numbers when you have an 18 page thread on this very subject already
or several Chicago threads in the general forum when there are regional threads specifically for that purpose. Don't get me wrong, Chicago is great, but there is a reason for the structure to the forum...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #782  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 2:51 PM
min-chi-cbus min-chi-cbus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 497
In response to LMich's list of state populations (I don't want to quote that much text and waste space!), what do these numbers represent? I'm confused! There are still states that have not received the Census results for the "official" 2010 Census, yet there are state by state population totals? These are different, no?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #783  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 4:55 PM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,335
Good data site

USA Today's Census data site has sortable tables of counties and all cities for every released state, and it's a heck of a lot easier than the Census' FactFumbler or monster CSV tables. No census tract data, though.
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #784  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 5:12 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 11,995
So if Chicago pushed out all of the poor black people (which I highly doubt is the case), how high did the median income jump between now and the last census?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #785  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 5:29 PM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,335
The "Just missed" cities

Here's the cities between 95,000 and 100,000 that didn't make the cities list.

Edison, NJ: 99,967 (+2,280)
Odessa, TX: 99,940 (+8,997)
Round Rock, TX: 99,887 (+38,751)
Davenport, IA: 99,685 (+1,326)
Columbia, MD: 99,615 (+11,361)
Woodbridge, NJ: 99,585 (+2,382)
Santa Maria, CA: 99,553 (+22,130)
El Cajon, CA: 99,478 (+4,609)
Richardson, TX: 99,223 (+7,421)
Kenosha, WI: 99,218 (+8,866)
Rialto, CA: 99,171 (+7,298)
Broken Arrow, OK: 98,850 (+23,991)
Boulder, CO: 97,385 (+2,712)
San Mateo, CA: 97,207 (+4,725)
Roanoke, VA: 97,032 (+2,121)
Tyler, TX: 96,900 (+13,250)
Lawton, OK: 96,867 (+4,110)
Highlands Ranch, CO: 96,713 (+25,782)
Compton, CA: 96,455 (+2,962)
Clovis, CA: 95,631 (+27,163)
Portsmouth, VA: 95,535 (-5,030)
Lewisville, TX: 95,290 (+17,553)
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #786  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 6:43 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
So if Chicago pushed out all of the poor black people (which I highly doubt is the case), how high did the median income jump between now and the last census?
Caveat --- 2009 data is from ACS, 2000 data is from the long form census. Slight methodology change, probably still comparable, though unadjusted for inflation/CPI.

2000
Per Capita Income $20,175
Median Household Income $38,625
% Households making <$25k 33.0%

2009
Per Capita Income $26,800
Median Household Income $46,781
% households making <$25k 29.1%

Not sure how that compares with other cities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #787  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 7:22 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
Public housing demolition, by law, requires public housing replacement. So demolition by itself will not result in significant population decline.
Again I challenge you to back up this unsupported claim. Clearly there are some agreements that cities will replace housing, but it appears there is no across the board mandate--Wikipedia says the 1:1 replacement you claimed earlier in the thread was repealed by Congress--so what sort of requirement are you claiming exists now? It is entirely possible that Chicago actually lost population as a result of the demolitions, although it's unlikely the entire loss is due to such demos.
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #788  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 8:03 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint View Post
Again I challenge you to back up this unsupported claim. Clearly there are some agreements that cities will replace housing, but it appears there is no across the board mandate--Wikipedia says the 1:1 replacement you claimed earlier in the thread was repealed by Congress--so what sort of requirement are you claiming exists now? It is entirely possible that Chicago actually lost population as a result of the demolitions, although it's unlikely the entire loss is due to such demos.
I agree with you fflint. It is very likely a large part of the AA population decline in Chicago is related to the CHA's Plan for Transformation. The new developments at Henry Horner, Robert Taylor, Cabrini, will have less units total units and of the new ones being built, about 50% are for public housing residents. The other 50% are market rate or are rerserved as affordable, but not public housing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #789  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 9:35 PM
Ch.G, Ch.G's Avatar
Ch.G, Ch.G Ch.G, Ch.G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMich View Post
I'm a bit confused how the count found 9.88 million for Michigan, but the estimate for a few months after the count estimates a population back up to 9.93 million, which would only be -0.07% off the 2000 Census count. Does anyone know how they go about estimates in a Census year? Because, I was always under the impression that the 2010 estimates were largely based on the 2010 counts, and if that's the case, they'd have to be closer than what I'm seeing.
Good question. According to these estimates, Illinois's population is up 110k from last year-- a pretty high growth rate for a state that saw it's population increase on average 41k a year in the preceding decade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #790  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 9:45 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch.G, Ch.G View Post
Good question. According to these estimates, Illinois's population is up 110k from last year-- a pretty high growth rate for a state that saw it's population increase on average 41k a year in the preceding decade.
My only guess would be that the 2010 estimates are not based off the actual 2010 Census.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #791  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2011, 11:26 PM
L41A's Avatar
L41A L41A is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Peace Up, A-Town Down
Posts: 926
Quote:
Originally Posted by min-chi-cbus View Post
In response to LMich's list of state populations (I don't want to quote that much text and waste space!), what do these numbers represent? I'm confused! There are still states that have not received the Census results for the "official" 2010 Census, yet there are state by state population totals? These are different, no?
As I understand from the census website, the July 2010 estimates uses the Official 2000 Census Counts as a basis for the estimates.

After the Official 2010 Census Counts are released, annual estimates will then use the 2010 census counts as basis.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #792  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2011, 3:57 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by L41A View Post
As I understand from the census website, the July 2010 estimates uses the Official 2000 Census Counts as a basis for the estimates.

After the Official 2010 Census Counts are released, annual estimates will then use the 2010 census counts as basis.
Yep, you're most likely correct. I guess I'm confused as why they bother releasing an annual estimate in a count year to begin with. If they are to release it in a count year, you'd think that they'd base it off that year's count. Meh. It's the Census Bureau; they aren't exactly known for making things easy or efficient or clear.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #793  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2011, 6:08 PM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,335
Montana and New Mexico

Montana

Quote:
Data for Montana show that the five most populous incorporated places and their 2010 Census counts are Billings, 104,170; Missoula, 66,788; Great Falls, 58,505; Bozeman, 37,280; and Butte-Silver Bow, 34,200. Billings grew by 15.9 percent since the 2000 Census. Missoula grew by 17.1 percent, Great Falls grew by 3.2 percent, Bozeman grew by 35.5 percent, and Butte-Silver Bow decreased by 1.2 percent.

The largest county is Yellowstone, with a population of 147,972. Its population grew by 14.4 percent since 2000. The other counties in the top five include Missoula, with a population of 109,299 (increase of 14.1 percent); Flathead, 90,928 (increase of 22.1 percent); Gallatin, 89,513 (increase of 32.0 percent); and Cascade, 81,327 (increase of 1.2 percent).
New Mexico

Quote:
Data for New Mexico show that the five most populous incorporated places and their 2010 Census counts are Albuquerque, 545,852; Las Cruces, 97,618; Rio Rancho, 87,521; Santa Fe, 67,947; and Roswell, 48,366. Albuquerque grew by 21.7 percent since the 2000 Census. Las Cruces grew by 31.4 percent, Rio Rancho grew by 69.1 percent, Santa Fe grew by 9.2 percent, and Roswell grew by 6.8 percent.

The largest county is Bernalillo, with a population of 662,564. Its population grew by 19.0 percent since 2000. The other counties in the top five include Doña Ana, with a population of 209,233 (increase of 19.8 percent); Santa Fe, 144,170 (increase of 11.5 percent); Sandoval, 131,561 (increase of 46.3 percent); and San Juan, 130,044 (increase of 14.3 percent).
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #794  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2011, 6:12 PM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,335
Los Angeles city, CA: 3,792,621 (+97,801)
Chicago city, IL: 2,695,598 (-200,418)
Houston city, TX: 2,099,451 (+145,820)
Philadelphia city, PA: 1,526,006 (+8,456)
Phoenix city, AZ: 1,445,632 (+124,587)
San Antonio city, TX: 1,327,407 (+182,761)
San Diego city, CA: 1,307,402 (+84,002)
Dallas city, TX: 1,197,816 (+9,236)
San Jose city, CA: 945,942 (+50,999)
Indianapolis city, IN: 829,718 (+37,792)
San Francisco city, CA: 805,235 (+28,502)
Austin city, TX: 790,390 (+133,828)
Columbus city, OH: 787,033 (+75,563)
Fort Worth city, TX: 741,206 (+206,512)
Charlotte city, NC: 731,424 (+190,596)
El Paso city, TX: 649,121 (+85,459)
Baltimore city, MD: 620,961 (-30,193)
Seattle city, WA: 608,660 (+45,286)
Washington D.C.: 601,723 (+29,664)
Denver city, CO: 600,158 (+45,522)
Milwaukee city, WI: 594,833 (-2,141)
Portland city, OR: 583,776 (+54,655)
Las Vegas city, NV: 583,756 (+105,322)
Oklahoma City city, OK: 579,999 (+73,867)
Albuquerque city, NM: 545,852 (+97,247)
Tucson city, AZ: 520,116 (+33,417)
Fresno city, CA: 494,665 (+67,013)
Sacramento city, CA: 466,488 (+59,470)
Long Beach city, CA: 462,257 (+735)
Kansas City city, MO: 459,787 (+18,242)
Mesa city, AZ: 439,041 (+42,666)
Virginia Beach city, VA: 437,994 (+12,737)
Colorado Springs city, CO: 416,427 (+55,537)
Omaha city, NE: 408,958 (+18,951)
Raleigh city, NC: 403,892 (+127,799)
Cleveland city, OH: 396,815 (-81,588)
Tulsa city, OK: 391,906 (-1,143)
Oakland city, CA: 390,724 (-8,760)
Honolulu CDP (incl. East Honolulu) 387,170 (+15,513)
Wichita city, KS: 382,368 (+38,084)
Arlington city, TX: 365,438 (+32,469)
Bakersfield city, CA: 347,483 (+100,426)
New Orleans city, LA: 343,829 (-140,845)
Anaheim city, CA: 336,265 (+8,251)
Aurora city, CO: 325,078 (+48,685)
Santa Ana city, CA: 324,528 (-13,449)
St. Louis city, MO: 319,294 (-28,895)
Pittsburgh city, PA: 305,704 (-28,859)
Corpus Christi city, TX: 305,215 (+27,761)
Riverside city, CA: 303,871 (+48,705)
Cincinnati city, OH: 296,943 (-34,342)
Stockton city, CA: 291,707 (+47,936)
Toledo city, OH: 287,208 (-26,411)
Newark city, NJ: 277,140 (+3,594)
Greensboro city, NC: 269,666 (+45,775)
Plano city, TX: 259,841 (+37,811)
Lincoln city, NE: 258,379 (+32,798)
Henderson city, NV: 257,729 (+82,348)
Fort Wayne city, IN: 253,691 (+47,964)
Jersey City city, NJ: 247,597 (+7,542)
Chula Vista city, CA: 243,916 (+70,360)
Norfolk city, VA: 242,803 (+8,400)
Chandler city, AZ: 236,123 (+59,542)
Laredo city, TX: 236,091 (+59,515)
Madison city, WI: 233,209 (+25,155)
Winston-Salem city, NC: 229,617 (+43,841)
Lubbock city, TX: 229,573 (+30,009)
Baton Rouge city, LA: 229,493 (+1,675)
Durham city, NC: 228,330 (+41,295)
Garland city, TX: 226,876 (+11,108)
Glendale city, AZ: 226,721 (+7,909)
Reno city, NV: 225,221 (+44,741)
Chesapeake city, VA: 222,209 (+23,025)
Scottsdale city, AZ: 217,385 (+14,680)
North Las Vegas city, NV: 216,961 (+101,473)
Irving city, TX: 216,290 (+24,675)
Fremont city, CA: 214,089 (+10,676)
Irvine city, CA: 212,375 (+69,303)
Birmingham city, AL: 212,237 (-30,583)
San Bernardino city, CA: 209,924 (+24,523)
Spokane city, WA: 208,916 (+13,287)
Gilbert city, AZ: 208,453 (+98,756)
Montgomery city, AL: 205,764 (+4,196)
Boise city, ID: 205,671 (+19,884)
Richmond city, VA: 204,214 (+6,424)
Des Moines city, IA: 203,433 (+4,751)
Modesto city, CA: 201,165 (+12,309)
Fayetteville city, NC: 200,564 (+79,549)
Shreveport city, LA: 199,311 (-834)
Akron city, OH: 199,110 (-17,964)
Tacoma city, WA: 198,397 (+4,841)
Aurora city, IL: 197,899 (+54,909)
Oxnard city, CA: 197,899 (+27,541)
Fontana city, CA: 196,069 (+67,140)
Mobile city, AL: 195,111 (-3,804)
Little Rock city, AR: 193,524 (+10,391)
Moreno Valley city, CA: 193,365 (+50,984)
Glendale city, CA: 191,719 (-3,254)
Amarillo city, TX: 190,695 (+17,068)
Huntington Beach city, CA: 189,992 (+398)
Salt Lake City city, UT: 186,440 (+4,697)
Newport News city, VA: 180,719 (+569)
Huntsville city, AL: 180,105 (+21,889)
Santa Clarita city, CA: 176,320 (+25,232)
Grand Prairie city, TX: 175,396 (+47,969)
Brownsville city, TX: 175,023 (+35,301)
Jackson city, MS: 173,514 (-10,742)
Overland Park city, KS: 173,372 (+24,292)
Garden Grove city, CA: 170,883 (+5,687)
Santa Rosa city, CA: 167,815 (+20,220)
Oceanside city, CA: 167,086 (+6,057)
Rancho Cucamonga city, CA: 165,269 (+37,526)
Ontario city, CA: 163,924 (+5,917)
Vancouver city, WA: 161,791 (+18,231)
Tempe city, AZ: 161,719 (+3,094)
Springfield city, MO: 159,498 (+7,918)
Lancaster city, CA: 156,633 (+37,915)
Eugene city, OR: 156,185 (+18,292)
Salem city, OR: 154,637 (+17,713)
Peoria city, AZ: 154,065 (+45,701)
Sioux Falls city, SD: 153,888 (+29,913)
Elk Grove city, CA: 153,015 (+93,031)
Rockford city, IL: 152,871 (+2,756)
Palmdale city, CA: 152,750 (+36,080)
Corona city, CA: 152,374 (+27,378)
Salinas city, CA: 150,441 (-619)
Pomona city, CA: 149,058 (-415)
Pasadena city, TX: 149,043 (+7,369)
Joliet city, IL: 147,433 (+41,212)
Paterson city, NJ: 146,199 (-3,023)
Kansas City city, KS: 145,786 (-1,080)
Torrance city, CA: 145,438 (+7,492)
Bridgeport city, CT: 144,229 (+4,700)
Hayward city, CA: 144,186 (+4,156)
Fort Collins city, CO: 143,986 (+25,334)
Escondido city, CA: 143,911 (+10,352)
Lakewood city, CO: 142,980 (-1,146)
Naperville city, IL: 141,853 (+13,495)
Dayton city, OH: 141,527 (-24,652)
Sunnyvale city, CA: 140,081 (+8,321)
Alexandria city, VA: 139,966 (+11,683)
Mesquite city, TX: 139,824 (+15,301)
Hampton city, VA: 137,436 (-9,001)
Pasadena city, CA: 137,122 (+3,186)
Orange city, CA: 136,416 (+7,595)
Cary town, NC: 135,234 (+40,698)
Fullerton city, CA: 135,161 (+9,158)
McKinney city, TX: 131,117 (+76,748)
McAllen city, TX: 129,877 (+23,463)
New Haven city, CT: 129,779 (+6,153)
West Valley City city, UT: 129,480 (+20,584)
Killeen city, TX: 127,921 (+41,010)
Topeka city, KS: 127,473 (+5,096)
Thousand Oaks city, CA: 126,683 (+9,678)
East Los Angeles CDP, CA: 126,496 (+2,213)
Cedar Rapids city, IA: 126,326 (+5,568)
Olathe city, KS: 125,872 (+32,910)
Elizabeth city, NJ: 124,969 (+4,401)
Waco city, TX: 124,805 (+11,079)
Hartford city, CT: 124,775 (+3,197)
Visalia city, CA: 124,442 (+32,877)
Simi Valley city, CA: 124,237 (+12,886)
Stamford city, CT: 122,643 (+5,560)
Bellevue city, WA: 122,363 (+12,794)
Concord city, CA: 122,067 (+287)
Lafayette city, LA: 120,623 (+10,366)
Carrollton city, TX: 119,097 (+9,521)
Roseville city, CA: 118,788 (+38,867)
Thornton city, CO: 118,772 (+36,388)
Beaumont city, TX: 118,296 (+4,430)
Allentown city, PA: 118,032 (11,400)
Surprise city, AZ: 117,517 (+86,669)
Evansville city, IN: 117,429 (-4,153)
Abilene city, TX: 117,063 (+1,133)
Frisco city, TX: 116,989 (+83,275)
Independence city, MO: 116,830 (+3,542)
Santa Clara city, CA: 116,468 (+14,107)
Springfield city, IL: 116,250 (+4,796)
Vallejo city, CA: 115,942 (-818)
Victorville city, CA: 115,903 (+51,873)
Peoria city, IL: 115,007 (+2,071)
El Monte city, CA: 113,475 (-2,490)
Denton city, TX: 113,383 (+32,846)
Berkeley city, CA: 112,580 (+9,758)
Provo city, UT: 112,488 (+7,322)
Downey city, CA: 111,772 (+4,449)
Midland city, TX: 111,147 (+16,151)
Norman city, OK: 110,925 (+15,231)
Waterbury city, CT: 110,366 (+3,095)
Costa Mesa city, CA: 109,960 (+1,236)
Inglewood city, CA: 109,673 (-2,907)
Columbia city, MO: 108,500 (+23,969)
Elgin city, IL: 108,188 (+13,701)
Pueblo city, CO: 106,595 (+4,474)
Wilmington city, NC: 106,476 (+30,638)
Arvada city, CO: 106,433 (+4,280)
Ventura city, CA: 106,433 (+5,517)
Westminster city, CO: 106,114 (+5,174)
West Covina city, CA: 106,098 (+1,018)
Gresham city, OR: 105,594 (+15,389)
Norwalk city, CA: 105,549 (+2,251)
Carlsbad city, CA: 105,328 (+27,081)
Fairfield city, CA: 105,321 (+9,143)
Wichita Falls city, TX: 104,553 (+356)
High Point city, NC: 104,371 (+18,532)
Billings city, MT: 104,170 (+14,323)
Green Bay city, WI: 104,057 (+1,744)
West Jordan city, UT: 103,712 (+35,376)
Richmond city, CA: 103,701 (+4,485)
Murrieta city, CA: 103,466 (+59,184)
Burbank city, CA: 103,340 (+3,024)
Everett city, WA: 103,019 (+11,531)
Antioch city, CA: 102,372 (+11,840)
Erie city, PA: 101,786 (-1,931)
South Bend city, IN: 101,168 (-6,621)
Daly City city, CA: 101,123 (-2,498)
Centennial city, CO: 100,377 (n/a)
Temecula city, CA: 100,097 (+42,381)
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #795  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2011, 7:13 PM
lawfin lawfin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
Caveat --- 2009 data is from ACS, 2000 data is from the long form census. Slight methodology change, probably still comparable, though unadjusted for inflation/CPI.

2000
Per Capita Income $20,175
Median Household Income $38,625
% Households making <$25k 33.0%

2009
Per Capita Income $26,800
Median Household Income $46,781
% households making <$25k 29.1%

Not sure how that compares with other cities.
I wonder how that growth rate compares with the US at large?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #796  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2011, 7:19 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 50,586
The Latino Shift


March 15, 2011

By Gustavo Razzetti

Read More: http://www.clickz.com/clickz/column/2033955/latino-shift

Quote:
.....

* Now we are counting: the information for 32 states has already been released, representing 68.2 percent of the overall population. #shift

* A confirmed trend: Hispanics contributed 59 percent of the overall population growth in 32 states. #shift

* The Hispanic population in 24 out of 32 states currently released has increased by over 50 percent between 2000 and 2020. #shift

* Hispanic population under 35 years old grew 51.5 percent in the last two decades versus a 7.3 percent growth for non-Hispanic whites. #shift

* Forever young? While most of Latinos (61.8 percent) are still under 35 years old, the number has reduced significantly (68.7 percent in 1990). #shift

* Arizona, Texas, and California are among the states with the smallest change in Hispanic population; however, Hispanics make up 30 percent or more of their total populations. #shift

* Of the states that have been released, Alabama, Arkansas, North Carolina, Maryland, Mississippi, and South Dakota all have Hispanic growth above 100 percent. #shift

.....
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #797  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2011, 7:54 PM
urbanactivist's Avatar
urbanactivist urbanactivist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,273
Hey Dralcoffin, thanks for posting the lists, but it's just been bugging me to try and distinguish which cities gained and lost. Easy solution

Los Angeles city, CA: 3,792,621 (+97,801)
Chicago city, IL: 2,695,598 (-200,418)
Houston city, TX: 2,099,451 (+145,820)
Philadelphia city, PA: 1,526,006 (+8,456)
Phoenix city, AZ: 1,445,632 (+124,587)
San Antonio city, TX: 1,327,407 (+182,761)
San Diego city, CA: 1,307,402 (+84,002)
Dallas city, TX: 1,197,816 (+9,236)
San Jose city, CA: 945,942 (+50,999)
Indianapolis city, IN: 829,718 (+37,792)
San Francisco city, CA: 805,235 (+28,502)
Austin city, TX: 790,390 (+133,828)
Columbus city, OH: 787,033 (+75,563)
Fort Worth city, TX: 741,206 (+206,512)
Charlotte city, NC: 731,424 (+190,596)
El Paso city, TX: 649,121 (+85,459)
Baltimore city, MD: 620,961 (-30,193)
Seattle city, WA: 608,660 (+45,286)
Washington D.C.: 601,723 (+29,664)
Denver city, CO: 600,158 (+45,522)
Milwaukee city, WI: 594,833 (-2,141)
Portland city, OR: 583,776 (+54,655)
Las Vegas city, NV: 583,756 (+105,322)
Oklahoma City city, OK: 579,999 (+73,867)
Albuquerque city, NM: 545,852 (+97,247)
Tucson city, AZ: 520,116 (+33,417)
Fresno city, CA: 494,665 (+67,013)
Sacramento city, CA: 466,488 (+59,470)
Long Beach city, CA: 462,257 (+735)
Kansas City city, MO: 459,787 (+18,242)
Mesa city, AZ: 439,041 (+42,666)
Virginia Beach city, VA: 437,994 (+12,737)
Colorado Springs city, CO: 416,427 (+55,537)
Omaha city, NE: 408,958 (+18,951)
Raleigh city, NC: 403,892 (+127,799)
Cleveland city, OH: 396,815 (-81,588)
Tulsa city, OK: 391,906 (-1,143)
Oakland city, CA: 390,724 (-8,760)
Honolulu CDP (incl. East Honolulu) 387,170 (+15,513)
Wichita city, KS: 382,368 (+38,084)
Arlington city, TX: 365,438 (+32,469)
Bakersfield city, CA: 347,483 (+100,426)
New Orleans city, LA: 343,829 (-140,845)
Anaheim city, CA: 336,265 (+8,251)
Aurora city, CO: 325,078 (+48,685)
Santa Ana city, CA: 324,528 (-13,449)
St. Louis city, MO: 319,294 (-28,895)
Pittsburgh city, PA: 305,704 (-28,859)
Corpus Christi city, TX: 305,215 (+27,761)
Riverside city, CA: 303,871 (+48,705)
Cincinnati city, OH: 296,943 (-34,342)
Stockton city, CA: 291,707 (+47,936)
Toledo city, OH: 287,208 (-26,411)
Newark city, NJ: 277,140 (+3,594)
Greensboro city, NC: 269,666 (+45,775)
Plano city, TX: 259,841 (+37,811)
Lincoln city, NE: 258,379 (+32,798)
Henderson city, NV: 257,729 (+82,348)
Fort Wayne city, IN: 253,691 (+47,964)
Jersey City city, NJ: 247,597 (+7,542)
Chula Vista city, CA: 243,916 (+70,360)
Norfolk city, VA: 242,803 (+8,400)
Chandler city, AZ: 236,123 (+59,542)
Laredo city, TX: 236,091 (+59,515)
Madison city, WI: 233,209 (+25,155)
Winston-Salem city, NC: 229,617 (+43,841)
Lubbock city, TX: 229,573 (+30,009)
Baton Rouge city, LA: 229,493 (+1,675)
Durham city, NC: 228,330 (+41,295)
Garland city, TX: 226,876 (+11,108)
Glendale city, AZ: 226,721 (+7,909)
Reno city, NV: 225,221 (+44,741)
Chesapeake city, VA: 222,209 (+23,025)
Scottsdale city, AZ: 217,385 (+14,680)
North Las Vegas city, NV: 216,961 (+101,473)
Irving city, TX: 216,290 (+24,675)
Fremont city, CA: 214,089 (+10,676)
Irvine city, CA: 212,375 (+69,303)
Birmingham city, AL: 212,237 (-30,583)
San Bernardino city, CA: 209,924 (+24,523)
Spokane city, WA: 208,916 (+13,287)
Gilbert city, AZ: 208,453 (+98,756)
Montgomery city, AL: 205,764 (+4,196)
Boise city, ID: 205,671 (+19,884)
Richmond city, VA: 204,214 (+6,424)
Des Moines city, IA: 203,433 (+4,751)
Modesto city, CA: 201,165 (+12,309)
Fayetteville city, NC: 200,564 (+79,549)
Shreveport city, LA: 199,311 (-834)
Akron city, OH: 199,110 (-17,964)
Tacoma city, WA: 198,397 (+4,841)
Aurora city, IL: 197,899 (+54,909)
Oxnard city, CA: 197,899 (+27,541)
Fontana city, CA: 196,069 (+67,140)
Mobile city, AL: 195,111 (-3,804)
Little Rock city, AR: 193,524 (+10,391)
Moreno Valley city, CA: 193,365 (+50,984)
Glendale city, CA: 191,719 (-3,254)
Amarillo city, TX: 190,695 (+17,068)
Huntington Beach city, CA: 189,992 (+398)
Salt Lake City city, UT: 186,440 (+4,697)
Newport News city, VA: 180,719 (+569)
Huntsville city, AL: 180,105 (+21,889)
Santa Clarita city, CA: 176,320 (+25,232)
Grand Prairie city, TX: 175,396 (+47,969)
Brownsville city, TX: 175,023 (+35,301)
Jackson city, MS: 173,514 (-10,742)
Overland Park city, KS: 173,372 (+24,292)
Garden Grove city, CA: 170,883 (+5,687)
Santa Rosa city, CA: 167,815 (+20,220)
Oceanside city, CA: 167,086 (+6,057)
Rancho Cucamonga city, CA: 165,269 (+37,526)
Ontario city, CA: 163,924 (+5,917)
Vancouver city, WA: 161,791 (+18,231)
Tempe city, AZ: 161,719 (+3,094)
Springfield city, MO: 159,498 (+7,918)
Lancaster city, CA: 156,633 (+37,915)
Eugene city, OR: 156,185 (+18,292)
Salem city, OR: 154,637 (+17,713)
Peoria city, AZ: 154,065 (+45,701)
Sioux Falls city, SD: 153,888 (+29,913)
Elk Grove city, CA: 153,015 (+93,031)
Rockford city, IL: 152,871 (+2,756)
Palmdale city, CA: 152,750 (+36,080)
Corona city, CA: 152,374 (+27,378)
Salinas city, CA: 150,441 (-619)
Pomona city, CA: 149,058 (-415)
Pasadena city, TX: 149,043 (+7,369)
Joliet city, IL: 147,433 (+41,212)
Paterson city, NJ: 146,199 (-3,023)
Kansas City city, KS: 145,786 (-1,080)
Torrance city, CA: 145,438 (+7,492)
Bridgeport city, CT: 144,229 (+4,700)
Hayward city, CA: 144,186 (+4,156)
Fort Collins city, CO: 143,986 (+25,334)
Escondido city, CA: 143,911 (+10,352)
Lakewood city, CO: 142,980 (-1,146)
Naperville city, IL: 141,853 (+13,495)
Dayton city, OH: 141,527 (-24,652)
Sunnyvale city, CA: 140,081 (+8,321)
Alexandria city, VA: 139,966 (+11,683)
Mesquite city, TX: 139,824 (+15,301)
Hampton city, VA: 137,436 (-9,001)
Pasadena city, CA: 137,122 (+3,186)
Orange city, CA: 136,416 (+7,595)
Cary town, NC: 135,234 (+40,698)
Fullerton city, CA: 135,161 (+9,158)
McKinney city, TX: 131,117 (+76,748)
McAllen city, TX: 129,877 (+23,463)
New Haven city, CT: 129,779 (+6,153)
West Valley City city, UT: 129,480 (+20,584)
Killeen city, TX: 127,921 (+41,010)
Topeka city, KS: 127,473 (+5,096)
Thousand Oaks city, CA: 126,683 (+9,678)
East Los Angeles CDP, CA: 126,496 (+2,213)
Cedar Rapids city, IA: 126,326 (+5,568)
Olathe city, KS: 125,872 (+32,910)
Elizabeth city, NJ: 124,969 (+4,401)
Waco city, TX: 124,805 (+11,079)
Hartford city, CT: 124,775 (+3,197)
Visalia city, CA: 124,442 (+32,877)
Simi Valley city, CA: 124,237 (+12,886)
Stamford city, CT: 122,643 (+5,560)
Bellevue city, WA: 122,363 (+12,794)
Concord city, CA: 122,067 (+287)
Lafayette city, LA: 120,623 (+10,366)
Carrollton city, TX: 119,097 (+9,521)
Roseville city, CA: 118,788 (+38,867)
Thornton city, CO: 118,772 (+36,388)
Beaumont city, TX: 118,296 (+4,430)
Allentown city, PA: 118,032 (11,400)
Surprise city, AZ: 117,517 (+86,669)
Evansville city, IN: 117,429 (-4,153)
Abilene city, TX: 117,063 (+1,133)
Frisco city, TX: 116,989 (+83,275)
Independence city, MO: 116,830 (+3,542)
Santa Clara city, CA: 116,468 (+14,107)
Springfield city, IL: 116,250 (+4,796)
Vallejo city, CA: 115,942 (-818)
Victorville city, CA: 115,903 (+51,873)
Peoria city, IL: 115,007 (+2,071)
El Monte city, CA: 113,475 (-2,490)
Denton city, TX: 113,383 (+32,846)
Berkeley city, CA: 112,580 (+9,758)
Provo city, UT: 112,488 (+7,322)
Downey city, CA: 111,772 (+4,449)
Midland city, TX: 111,147 (+16,151)
Norman city, OK: 110,925 (+15,231)
Waterbury city, CT: 110,366 (+3,095)
Costa Mesa city, CA: 109,960 (+1,236)
Inglewood city, CA: 109,673 (-2,907)
Columbia city, MO: 108,500 (+23,969)
Elgin city, IL: 108,188 (+13,701)
Pueblo city, CO: 106,595 (+4,474)
Wilmington city, NC: 106,476 (+30,638)
Arvada city, CO: 106,433 (+4,280)
Ventura city, CA: 106,433 (+5,517)
Westminster city, CO: 106,114 (+5,174)
West Covina city, CA: 106,098 (+1,018)
Gresham city, OR: 105,594 (+15,389)
Norwalk city, CA: 105,549 (+2,251)
Carlsbad city, CA: 105,328 (+27,081)
Fairfield city, CA: 105,321 (+9,143)
Wichita Falls city, TX: 104,553 (+356)
High Point city, NC: 104,371 (+18,532)
Billings city, MT: 104,170 (+14,323)
Green Bay city, WI: 104,057 (+1,744)
West Jordan city, UT: 103,712 (+35,376)
Richmond city, CA: 103,701 (+4,485)
Murrieta city, CA: 103,466 (+59,184)
Burbank city, CA: 103,340 (+3,024)
Everett city, WA: 103,019 (+11,531)
Antioch city, CA: 102,372 (+11,840)
Erie city, PA: 101,786 (-1,931)
South Bend city, IN: 101,168 (-6,621)
Daly City city, CA: 101,123 (-2,498)
Centennial city, CO: 100,377 (n/a)
Temecula city, CA: 100,097 (+42,381)
__________________
Photo Threads for Memphis, Dallas, Ft. Worth, Galveston (before Ike), Kansas City,Houston, more Houston
Little Rock, and New Orleans, cont'd.

For politics, check out my blog Texas Leftist
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #798  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2011, 8:01 PM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,335
OK, I'll keep that highlighting from now on. I also thought of separating out California and Texas into their own list so that the other states aren't overwhelmed.
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #799  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2011, 10:26 PM
lawfin lawfin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post
The Latino Shift


March 15, 2011

By Gustavo Razzetti

Read More: http://www.clickz.com/clickz/column/2033955/latino-shift
I wonder how this growth of the new brown skinned other played into the paranoid fears of teabaggers and helped mobilize them in 2010; mix demographic shift with economic calamity.....presto chango.....nationalism run amok
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #800  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2011, 10:38 PM
HurricaneHugo's Avatar
HurricaneHugo HurricaneHugo is offline
Category Five
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,012
Albuquerque is a lot larger than I thought it would be...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:21 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.