Quote:
Originally Posted by kgc087
The airport looks pretty swank. Now if only the architect behind this could influence the TRAGIC interiors. I don't understand why colour has to be used as well as polyester/nylon plants and laminate. It makes NO SENSE!
|
Yeah, I hate plastic plants, especially when they should be real. It's delightful to go into city hospital's atrium where there are banks of real plants going all the way up. I also stopped by the minigolf course at Market Mall the other day, and delighted in it - that thing is probably as big as the Mendel conservatory! And although the white poinsettia accents were fake, the vast majority of plants in there are real. Front desk lady said "the plant people" come by once a week to tend the gardens. These "plant people" (anybody know who?) should make a pitch to the airport to install real banks of plants, drip lines, the works... how awesome would it be to have a waiting area in an airport double as a conservatory?
There seems to be some awful rule about making airport interiors as impersonal as possible, with furniture that's as uncomfortable as possible. The one exception I've found to this is Calgary's airport. I love that place - it's full of shapes, spaces, variety of colour, texture, and mood, and it makes my layovers enjoyable just by walking from one end to the other. The polar opposite to this is Toronto's Pearson airport, with stretches of white or grey paneling.... christ, how 60's.
If Saskatoon's airport could have stone walls, fountains, lots of plants, and more of a food court, it'd be an incredible improvement. Then again, I consider what we have today, versus what was there in 1995.

How far we've already come..... Anybody remember the rat-infested nameless restaurant, and that red wall tile? <gag>