HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    One World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11801  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2011, 7:06 PM
OneWorldTradeCenter's Avatar
OneWorldTradeCenter OneWorldTradeCenter is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,201
     
     
  #11802  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2011, 7:11 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,289
Upon a more careful observation of these pics, the glass on 1 WTC is very similar, if not exactly the same quality of 7 WTC, save for the difference in the spandrel glass. Which I see as a good thing. The glass on 7 WTC is very dynamic - bright and reflective from some angles, and completely transparent from others, while being both from many more.

Personally, I like the open space in the spandrel glass of 7 WTC more, as it more clearly delineates the floors, especially from a distance. But I'm not sure that visual trick would work as well on 1 WTC's angular, tapering sides. It might distract one from the overall form of the tower.

So after initially worrying about the quality of the glass when we saw the first few panels, I'm coming around to really digging it.
     
     
  #11803  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2011, 7:14 PM
OneWorldTradeCenter's Avatar
OneWorldTradeCenter OneWorldTradeCenter is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,201
Just a question about the glass. I apologize if someone pointed that already out.

How many single windows will be used at the entire tower? And what is the weight of one window?
     
     
  #11804  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2011, 7:15 PM
Lecom's Avatar
Lecom Lecom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by colemonkee View Post
Personally, I like the open space in the spandrel glass of 7 WTC more, as it more clearly delineates the floors, especially from a distance. But I'm not sure that visual trick would work as well on 1 WTC's angular, tapering sides. It might distract one from the overall form of the tower.

So after initially worrying about the quality of the glass when we saw the first few panels, I'm coming around to really digging it.
Agreed. 7WTC is a simple parallelogram, it needed distinction in its details and surface treatment. If the same dynamic curtain wall was applied to the already dynamic shape of 1WTC, the design would've came out too busy.
     
     
  #11805  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2011, 8:27 PM
jigglysquishy's Avatar
jigglysquishy jigglysquishy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,326
Now that the sixth floor of glass is up we can really see how the tower will shape up. Truly beautiful. I can't wait to see this tower in person.
     
     
  #11806  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2011, 9:38 PM
sask1982's Avatar
sask1982 sask1982 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 916
Quote:
Originally Posted by jigglysquishy View Post
I can't wait to see this tower in person.
Same here! I'm going to NYC for the first time in late fall 2011/early winter - I can't wait! I'm thinking it isn't topped off by then, it should be close!
     
     
  #11807  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2011, 9:58 PM
sterlippo1 sterlippo1 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by sask1982 View Post
Same here! I'm going to NYC for the first time in late fall 2011/early winter - I can't wait! I'm thinking it isn't topped off by then, it should be close!
as a first timer, you will be in awe and not just over the WTC site
     
     
  #11808  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2011, 10:51 PM
Zensteeldude Zensteeldude is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOOMingTOWER View Post
Why is criticism of these buildings or dissenting opinions frowned upon in this forum? Nitpickers, really? Is this supposed to be a cheerleading website for tall buildings or an informative and accessible place to discuss architecture? (I'd prefer both)

STR's renderings are indeed incredible and I love looking at them too -- I hadn't noticed how the seams of the glass along the edge of the tower line up until the new closeups photos of the construction. In the totality of the facade maybe the seams don't look as awkward, but then again as Charles Eames said, “The details are not the details. They make the design.”
Everyone is entitled to there opinion, but I find 3 pages full of criticism about the same thing every other day rather tiring.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
I'm not sure what you would expect the designer or glass manufacturer to do. It's and angle. At some point and time (and it will repeat again all the way up the building) you are either going to have a seam or a larger pane of glass. You can only make a sliver of glazing so small and be able to securely attach it to the building.
Biff gets it.

This tower was designed to withstand hurricane force winds while looking great doing it.
     
     
  #11809  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2011, 11:30 PM
STR's Avatar
STR STR is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBuild View Post
Love that render capture, STR. 1 WTC looks spectacular from that angle and you can clearly see the descending height relationship from 1 > 2 > 3 > 4 WTC. Never noticed the different height step outs on the North and South sides of 3 WTC until your renders.
All the setbacks on 3 & 4 are deliberate attempts to form a relationship between the two buildings.
     
     
  #11810  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2011, 11:51 PM
brian.odonnell20 brian.odonnell20 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by STR View Post
All the setbacks on 3 & 4 are deliberate attempts to form a relationship between the two buildings.
That's a little bit of a stretch, don't you think? Your're essentially just comparing two highly placed setbacks. You could easily do that for a whole lot of buildings, even just in nyc. I would say that the two buildings are very similar, but I wouldn't call it a deliberate relationship.
     
     
  #11811  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2011, 12:14 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian.odonnell20 View Post
That's a little bit of a stretch, don't you think? Your're essentially just comparing two highly placed setbacks.
No, it was mentioned before by the architects. But this isn't the proper thread for that discussion.


Hayes Peter Mauro

     
     
  #11812  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2011, 12:19 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,734
It’s looking better and better by the day.

It’s funny to see the Verizon building essentially surrounded in that photo.
     
     
  #11813  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2011, 12:26 AM
GioFX's Avatar
GioFX GioFX is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 617
^ yep, still is a bit sad the poor Verizon will not get any more direct sunlight.
     
     
  #11814  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2011, 12:26 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,285
I don't know about my prediction of catching 7 WTC by the end of the month. Still possible, but we'll have to see.
     
     
  #11815  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2011, 12:29 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioFX View Post
^ yep, still is a bit sad the poor Verizon will not get any more direct sunlight.
I’ve always thought that building would be better grouped rather than standalone (as it recently has been). It’s just funny to see such an old building being surrounded by modern glass buildings; shows distinctively how times change.
     
     
  #11816  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2011, 12:30 AM
Obey's Avatar
Obey Obey is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 688
Yes! More floors on the way, finally.
     
     
  #11817  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2011, 3:14 AM
2-TOWERS's Avatar
2-TOWERS 2-TOWERS is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneWorldTradeCenter View Post
STUNNING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
     
  #11818  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2011, 4:00 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,523
     
     
  #11819  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2011, 4:39 AM
Jonboy1983's Avatar
Jonboy1983 Jonboy1983 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,721
Man... If they were to cancel the other buildings and rebuild 2 WTC to be a twin component to One WTC...

One World Trade Center is going to look spec-fricking-TACULAR!
     
     
  #11820  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2011, 8:12 AM
robby68 robby68 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterlippo1 View Post
as a first timer, you will be in awe and not just over the WTC site
You will fall in love with the city and keep coming back
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:02 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.