HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #241  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 1:57 AM
youngregina's Avatar
youngregina youngregina is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 986
I came across an intersection known as a Continuous Flow Intersection. Some of you may know, but for others here is a link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVI3Ledw7mc

I truly think this type of design would work wonders along Victoria Avenue. Victoria Ave being the street with the extended left turn lanes. What do you guys think of this?
     
     
  #242  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 5:25 AM
Pavlov's Avatar
Pavlov Pavlov is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post


Regina is so backwards in their road construction policies. These old school city planners have this idea that if roads stay narrow, it will piss people off and force them to choose other routes. Case in point: 20th Ave
If you can annoy people enough, they won't go that way anymore.

I say, the wider the road the better off we all are. Traffic or no traffic, the farther I can position myself away from other vehicles the safer I feel and the faster traffic moves. Expanding a 1km section of Vic East won't instantly cause people to have a lightbulb moment and go "Hey, let's stop taking our normal route and take Vic instead!" Traffic will remain as the same people who take it everyday IMHO.
Agreed! I can't think of a better use of land than wider roads so that all the people exercising their God-given right to drive can feel safer! We all benefit!
     
     
  #243  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 8:20 AM
urbanregina urbanregina is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post


I say, the wider the road the better off we all are. Traffic or no traffic, the farther I can position myself away from other vehicles the safer I feel and the faster traffic moves. Expanding a 1km section of Vic East won't instantly cause people to have a lightbulb moment and go "Hey, let's stop taking our normal route and take Vic instead!" Traffic will remain as the same people who take it everyday IMHO.
When people feel too safe on the roads they drive like idiots. That is why modern traffic planning aims in some places to make you feel a little anxious. If drivers feel a little less safe they will drive more cautiously and in turn the roads end up safer. On the case on 20th avenue that is definintely an example of "traffic calming" look it up on wikipedia or wherever else you may choose. It's a little ugly looking in comparison to some examples I've seen but it is some of the most forward thinking traffic planning I've seen in this city considering that it is a residential street and not a major thoroughfare.
     
     
  #244  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 1:56 PM
darthrider's Avatar
darthrider darthrider is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumuser View Post
can you provide a source?


I park in that location for work, I have been told to look for other parking as construction is to commence shortly.
     
     
  #245  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 3:17 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
It's a multi-use building. Retail inluding a Rock Creek Bar and Grill on main and lofts above.

The parking garage forms are now in place. They also have erected a sign with this render on it. They are calling this Canterbury Common which does not jive with their website. I believe it says the lofts are starting at $239,000.
     
     
  #246  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 3:22 PM
Dan0myte Dan0myte is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanregina View Post
When people feel too safe on the roads they drive like idiots. That is why modern traffic planning aims in some places to make you feel a little anxious. If drivers feel a little less safe they will drive more cautiously and in turn the roads end up safer. On the case on 20th avenue that is definintely an example of "traffic calming" look it up on wikipedia or wherever else you may choose. It's a little ugly looking in comparison to some examples I've seen but it is some of the most forward thinking traffic planning I've seen in this city considering that it is a residential street and not a major thoroughfare.
That's a very left-wing mentality. "People don't know what's best for them and can't be trusted to make their own decisions about which road to take, so we will tell them which roads to take and make other ones inaccessible."

Let me guess, you're a long time NDP supporter too...
     
     
  #247  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 3:26 PM
Dan0myte Dan0myte is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reesonov View Post
Agreed! I can't think of a better use of land than wider roads so that all the people exercising their God-given right to drive can feel safer! We all benefit!
Unfortunately we live in North America, a continent built on having space and vast expanses of land. We're far too spread out to have an efficient mass-transit system (a la Europe), so the automobile is engrained into our culture. We're never going to kill the car, so why not ease the problem as best as possible? Shrinking roads and trying to constrict people's travels only makes the problem worse for frustration, congestion and yes, SAFETY.
     
     
  #248  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 3:41 PM
CCF's Avatar
CCF CCF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,533
Safety for whom?

Wider roads mean that drivers will travel at faster speeds. Id I'm a cyclist or pedestrian and you travel by me at 70 km, who exactly is the one feeling safe?

Pretty much everything you said goes against modern planning practices with respect to road design.
     
     
  #249  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 4:48 PM
Dan0myte Dan0myte is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 927
Maybe it's just because I'm a car guy at heart. Wide open highways, gas-guzzling V8's and people enjoying their vehicles seems like a better world than one full of busses and monorails and forced urban planning.
     
     
  #250  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 4:54 PM
dsim249's Avatar
dsim249 dsim249 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 946
^ Haha. Yikes. Wrong thread to be sharing that with!
     
     
  #251  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 5:01 PM
ceedub1170's Avatar
ceedub1170 ceedub1170 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
Unfortunately we live in North America, a continent built on having space and vast expanses of land. We're far too spread out to have an efficient mass-transit system (a la Europe), so the automobile is engrained into our culture. We're never going to kill the car, so why not ease the problem as best as possible? Shrinking roads and trying to constrict people's travels only makes the problem worse for frustration, congestion and yes, SAFETY.
I'm with you on this one, Dan0myte.
     
     
  #252  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 5:11 PM
Devon Devon is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
Unfortunately we live in North America, a continent built on having space and vast expanses of land. We're far too spread out to have an efficient mass-transit system (a la Europe), so the automobile is engrained into our culture. We're never going to kill the car, so why not ease the problem as best as possible? Shrinking roads and trying to constrict people's travels only makes the problem worse for frustration, congestion and yes, SAFETY.

Cross-country travel is one thing, but if we are talking urban centres there's a lot we can do to improve and cut down on car use.
     
     
  #253  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 6:03 PM
Pavlov's Avatar
Pavlov Pavlov is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
Maybe it's just because I'm a car guy at heart. Wide open highways, gas-guzzling V8's and people enjoying their vehicles seems like a better world than one full of busses and monorails and forced urban planning.
I suppose in a utopia of limitless resources the world you describe might be a better world. Of course I would still disagree based on my own personal lifestyle preferences. However, in that case, my preferences would have no more merit than yours.

Sadly, we do not live in a utopia of limitless resources. As such, public money, public land, and diminishing petroleum reserves should all be put to their most efficient uses, no?
     
     
  #254  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 6:33 PM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,597
`

Last edited by thefourthtower; Jul 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM.
     
     
  #255  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 7:25 PM
Dan0myte Dan0myte is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reesonov View Post
As such, public money, public land, and diminishing petroleum reserves should all be put to their most efficient uses, no?
Nah. If there was one barrel of petroleum left in the world, it should be spent powering the loudest big block Chevy possible, shredding the tires in a harmony of mechanical bliss, with the echo of each exhaust pulse ringing off of the buildings letting the world know one last time that humanity used to be great and powerful.

     
     
  #256  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 7:44 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,093
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefourthtower View Post
This is a significant investment by Mosaic into our downtown and into our city," said Coun. Michael Fougere on Wednesday. "It's a tremendous opportunity to have a world head office in Regina. It doesn't happen very often." from the regina leader post, quote from Michael fougere , i did not know that this was going to be a world head office
...World HQ of their potash operations division. They do not have potash operations anywhere else in the world. They have 3 mines, all in Sask.
     
     
  #257  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 8:21 PM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,597
`

Last edited by thefourthtower; Jul 5, 2013 at 6:13 PM.
     
     
  #258  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2010, 9:11 PM
Pavlov's Avatar
Pavlov Pavlov is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
Nah. If there was one barrel of petroleum left in the world, it should be spent powering the loudest big block Chevy possible, shredding the tires in a harmony of mechanical bliss, with the echo of each exhaust pulse ringing off of the buildings letting the world know one last time that humanity used to be great and powerful.

It really makes it difficult to mock your views as small-town and redneck when you express them so poetically. You jerk.
     
     
  #259  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2010, 2:51 PM
Rottie Rottie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 226
Mosaic office tower under construction. Garden's on Rose and Capital Pointe condo towers close to breaking ground. 2011 will have 3 highrises under construction in the same year. Looking at the diagrams section it has never happened before. Possibly add to 2011- Canterbury tower, Centre Square Place, and rumoured other downtown office tower if it goes through the process as quickly as Mosaic tower did.
     
     
  #260  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2010, 4:19 AM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,597
`

Last edited by thefourthtower; Jul 5, 2013 at 6:14 PM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:39 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.