HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9381  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2010, 12:15 AM
brithgob brithgob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsim249 View Post
^
Vale to spend $10B on Canadian operations

"...Vale is also evaluating a potash development project in Saskatchewan that could cost $2.5 billion to $3 billion..."


Source
Should be in the Regina thread, since the name of this project is the Regina Project.

http://www.vale.com/en-us/o-que-fazemos/mineracao/potassio/projetos/pages/default.aspx
     
     
  #9382  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2010, 12:28 AM
dsim249's Avatar
dsim249 dsim249 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by brithgob View Post
Should be in the Regina thread, since the name of this project is the Regina Project.

http://www.vale.com/en-us/o-que-fazemos/mineracao/potassio/projetos/pages/default.aspx

I was just posting the article because of prairieguy's question...

And just because it's called "The Regina Project" doesn't mean that the project will have zero benefit to Saskatoon. We don't know really know any details about it so far, do we?
Look at that potash map you posted in the Regina thread. There is BHP potash directly outside of Regina, yet their office is in Saskatoon.
So who knows.
     
     
  #9383  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2010, 1:35 AM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsim249 View Post

I was just posting the article because of prairieguy's question...

And just because it's called "The Regina Project" doesn't mean that the project will have zero benefit to Saskatoon. We don't know really know any details about it so far, do we?
Look at that potash map you posted in the Regina thread. There is BHP potash directly outside of Regina, yet their office is in Saskatoon.
So who knows.
You are right , it should not matter where it is posted
     
     
  #9384  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2010, 2:00 AM
brithgob brithgob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 833
I only mention it because a lot of the news reports today get as far as "a mine in Saskatchewan" and stop, and a lot of people who didn't know better might naturally assume it's another Saskatoon-area mine.
     
     
  #9385  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2010, 2:34 AM
kgc087's Avatar
kgc087 kgc087 is offline
Urban Dreamer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,128
I hope you have been reading my blog articles in regards to an urban campus extension via the U of S and a downtown architecture college building which is now a reality!
__________________
Just be.
     
     
  #9386  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2010, 5:06 PM
prairieguy prairieguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgc087 View Post
I hope you have been reading my blog articles in regards to an urban campus extension via the U of S and a downtown architecture college building which is now a reality!
can you please provide a link to your blog?
     
     
  #9387  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2010, 6:12 PM
Devon Devon is offline
Regina SK
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Saskatoon via Regina
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by prairieguy View Post
can you please provide a link to your blog?
http://communities.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/blogs/saskatoonspeaks/default.aspx

All the Saskatoon Speaks blogs are here as well.
     
     
  #9388  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2010, 6:29 PM
prairieguy prairieguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devon View Post
Thanks, Devon!
     
     
  #9389  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2010, 7:29 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodlandCritter View Post


On a side note, all of you who post photos on here, how do you keep them at a reasonable size? I would like to post some, but all my previous ones have been enormous sizes, is there a scale thing on this site or do you have them on a seperate blog and import them smaller? a little help? I tried looking on this website for info but came across none.
thanks.
Here is a link that should help you along. Image Posting Guide
Also most image servers have a way of down sizing your photo's. As a general rule I keep mine to 800x600.
     
     
  #9390  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 2:47 PM
kgc087's Avatar
kgc087 kgc087 is offline
Urban Dreamer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,128
City eyes land for bus barns
Purchase, clean-up of site near landfill totals $4.5 million
By David Hutton, The StarPhoenix November 19, 2010 7:54 AM

The multimillion-dollar relocation of two of the most space-consuming city departments now has an address.

The city has an agreement in place to purchase 180 acres of land north of Valley Road near Montgomery Place in southwest Saskatoon from a numbered Saskatchewan company to house the transit headquarters and bus storage barns, as well as the public works department and city yards.

The price: $2.25 million for the land with an extra $2 million needed to clean up the site.

Montgomery residents say the land has long been eyed by its owner for different developments, including a nine-hole golf course, greenhouses and an equestrian show jumping training centre.

Instead, it will likely house hundreds of city buses, snowplows and employees.

Acquiring the land, which requires council approval Monday night, would pave the way for the construction of a multimillion-dollar facility to house the relocated bus barns from south Caswell Hill. The location of the bus barns has been a long-standing problem for neighbourhood residents, who say the noisy and busy facility has no place in a residential area.

The site would also be the new home of the public works department and relocated city yards, which currently takes up 24 acres of storage land in the north downtown.

Given its massive size, the 180-acre site could also host a recycling centre, an impound lot, infrastructure services department offices and a snow dump, a city report said.

While the cost of the project isn't yet known, the transit headquarters alone have been estimated at more than $100 million.

The purchased land is close to the new Circle Drive South bridge, which would allow easy access for buses and snow plows to the city, the report said.

The logic of the move is a departure from the position taken by the city as recently as six years ago, when city staff and engineers said moving the city yards wouldn't be cost-effective or convenient given their downtown location and said a busy railway line cutting across the city yards would also be a strong deterrent against residential development.

But it's part of a city hall strategy to get space-consuming civic operations out of the city centre and develop the north downtown and south Caswell Hill -- two areas of the city with the largest opportunities for infill and increased population.

Earlier this week, a city committee reserved the 100-year-old John Deere building for the University of Saskatchewan's proposed school of architecture and set in motion a master planning process to redevelop the north downtown.

A master plan to turn south Caswell Hill into an arts district after transit leaves has already been passed by council.

[email protected]
© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix


Read more: http://www.thestarphoenix.com/City+eyes+land+barns/3852686/story.html#ixzz15jvJ8Nuj
_______________________________________-
This is some good and bad news. I really like that the busbarns etc will be moved but it really comes at the cost of the neighbourhood of Montgomery. The golf course, greenhouse idea sounds really nice but perhaps it can be built elsewhere to help define the neighbourhood? I'm excited to see what the development in the north will look like. I hope that the city has some major architectural controls in place. Has anyone seen the master plan to convert Caswell Hill into an arts district?
__________________
Just be.
     
     
  #9391  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 3:12 PM
Echoes's Avatar
Echoes Echoes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 4,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgc087 View Post
This is some good and bad news. I really like that the busbarns etc will be moved but it really comes at the cost of the neighbourhood of Montgomery. The golf course, greenhouse idea sounds really nice but perhaps it can be built elsewhere to help define the neighbourhood? I'm excited to see what the development in the north will look like. I hope that the city has some major architectural controls in place. Has anyone seen the master plan to convert Caswell Hill into an arts district?
Yup, that's the South Caswell Concept Plan, available here (final report in PDF):
http://www.saskatoon.ca/DEPARTMENTS/Comm...nning/Pages/SouthCaswellConceptPlan.aspx
__________________
SASKATOON PHOTO TOURS
2013: [Part I] [Part II] | [2014] | [2016] | [2022-26]
     
     
  #9392  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 4:02 PM
Cicero Cicero is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgc087 View Post
______________________________________-
This is some good and bad news. I really like that the busbarns etc will be moved but it really comes at the cost of the neighbourhood of Montgomery. The golf course, greenhouse idea sounds really nice but perhaps it can be built elsewhere to help define the neighbourhood? I'm excited to see what the development in the north will look like. I hope that the city has some major architectural controls in place. Has anyone seen the master plan to convert Caswell Hill into an arts district?
The area they're buying is directly south of Montgomery, right?

The area coloured blue, not green? It would really suck if the bus barn relocated just west of Montgomery. I wonder how the folks at Cedar Villa feel about this. This piece of land touches literally their backyards and is used as an unofficial off-leash area as well. I'm hoping the city only develops the field bordering Valley Road and Dundonald, a field that's relatively free of trees, ponds, trails, and other nifty places to explore.
     
     
  #9393  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 4:09 PM
kgc087's Avatar
kgc087 kgc087 is offline
Urban Dreamer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,128
I'm pretty sure the city will try to do everything it can to not develop anything that will detract from the neighbourhood value. I'm a bit upset about this relocation b/c it really kills the possibility of the landfill being a forested ski hill once it reaches max capacity. Although there could be some interesting adaptive architecture to focus on the hill rather then the industry around it.
__________________
Just be.
     
     
  #9394  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 4:22 PM
gowest gowest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 368
Transit

I don't think this will brother Montgomery that much as the CN yards already are next to the houses. It will increase traffic along Dundonald, but when the bridge is finished there will be much more traffic in the area. Cedar Villa is a whole different situation as it looks like it will come very close to it. Better to have these facilities next to a main rail yard than try to put housing there. When the new cut-off to the bridge is done, traffic on Valley Road will double so the peace and beauty of the area is going to change dramatically.
     
     
  #9395  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 4:46 PM
prairieguy prairieguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,571
I was driving by the River Landing Village site the other evening, and was surprised to see signage still referring to Lake Placid. I guess it really hasn't been that long a time period since Dr. Nasser and investors took over this project, but given the 'negative' connotation that Lake Placid has in this community currently, I hope that they remove this connection to Lake Placid soon.

Let's start fresh on this exciting development for Saskatoon! I also wonder how long before there will be some kind of 'sales office' established for the development??
     
     
  #9396  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 8:11 PM
gowest gowest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 368
REcycle

Quote:
Originally Posted by shmakim View Post
Regarding the replacement Traffic Bridge:
When they say "replica" I believe they mean stylistically the same, not _exactly_ the same. I'm all for it - it's like keeping the original asthetic while incorporating useful functionality. To the Heritage Society that's complaining they want an _exact_ replica, get a grip.

This is an exciting precedent for the city to take asthetics into account when building a large piece of infrastructure. Maybe the hero worship they get for doing this may inspire them to consider it more often?

Re bus barns: Yahoo! Great plan. That spot right next to the train yards would be unfavourable to residential development anyway, so I think it's an excellent location for bus barns and city yards. If they do add a recycling depot there, it'd make an incredible single location for Doors Open Saskatoon, if that ever happens again.

KGC, I don't see why this would impact the development of a ski hill at the landfill. No parking? Poor access? Seems like the extension of Circle Drive would impact that area more than some neighbouring city yards...
That's a great idea for a recycling depot at that location. If you are going to the landfill it would be just a short drove to recycle as well. They could also make it large enough that Sarcan could be there as well.
     
     
  #9397  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 8:16 PM
Ruckus's Avatar
Ruckus Ruckus is offline
working stiff
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Woodlawn Cemetery
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cicero View Post
The area they're buying is directly south of Montgomery, right?

The area coloured blue, not green? It would really suck if the bus barn relocated just west of Montgomery. I wonder how the folks at Cedar Villa feel about this. This piece of land touches literally their backyards and is used as an unofficial off-leash area as well. I'm hoping the city only develops the field bordering Valley Road and Dundonald, a field that's relatively free of trees, ponds, trails, and other nifty places to explore.
The orange parcel of land was my first guess because equipment and aggregate for the bridge project is located there. But, the Star Phoenix article stated the land is north of Valley Road and has access to Circle Drive. Perhaps it is the blue parcel then???

     
     
  #9398  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 9:19 PM
gowest gowest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 368
Bus Garage

There is a new ramp under constuction which comes between the blue and orange along the west side of the landfill and onto the new Circle Drive. The pilons are in place to go over Circle just north of the dump. So that would make sense of access to Circle Drive.
     
     
  #9399  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 9:58 PM
Cicero Cicero is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruckus View Post
The orange parcel of land was my first guess because equipment and aggregate for the bridge project is located there. But, the Star Phoenix article stated the land is north of Valley Road and has access to Circle Drive. Perhaps it is the blue parcel then???

That area would make the most sense (relatively free of trees, water, and hills and is close to the city), and it looks pretty damn close to being 180 acres. If that's the extent of the land purchased, it shouldn't invade Cedar Villa or threaten the artificial forests to the west. I live in this neck of the woods (if you haven't figured that out already), but I think this is a good move for the city. It's too bad the owner couldn't do something more interesting with the land, though.
     
     
  #9400  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2010, 10:10 PM
Ruckus's Avatar
Ruckus Ruckus is offline
working stiff
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Woodlawn Cemetery
Posts: 2,583
Here's my latest 'big idea' for a 21st Century 'human scaled' Saskatoon. I modeled it after San Antonio's River Walk. Now, because I'm not a civil engineer I don't know if this is technically feasible. As for the cost...probably a couple hundred million

The buildings would be mixed use, terraced 4-8 storeys, and linked through a network of pedestrian bridges and pathways running along both sides of the waterway. Controlling the rise and fall of the waterway relative to the river may prove too difficult and prohibitively expensive. As an aside, it might actually remain ice free during the winter months given the river is ice free on the west side due to the outflow from QE power station.




San Antonio River Walk (Wiki page)

Source


Source
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:49 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.