HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Calgary Issues, Business, Politics & the Economy


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2001  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 8:19 PM
Boris2k7's Avatar
Boris2k7 Boris2k7 is offline
Majestic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 11,960
@yads: Note sure on that one, it hasn't been an issue that's popped up this year afaik. I would actually toss him an email (or tweet) about it, he's usually very quick on the response and is pretty open and honest with his answers as he can be.
__________________
"The only thing that gets me through our winters is the knowledge that they're the only thing keeping us free of giant ass spiders." -MonkeyRonin

Flickr
     
     
  #2002  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 8:20 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radley77 View Post
Where is the land to support increased density? I've already cited the Bridgeland example, and it's probably about an average community along the LRT line with 16% growth over 19 years.

Where is the operational costs saving to justify implementation of subway system? Even excluding capital costs you are looking at spending more on tunnel HVAC system, more on tunnel lighting system, more on tunnel maintenance, more on tunnel pumping system.

So what is the economic justification for a Centre Street alignment? A Nose Creek alignment can address many of these issues by having larger revenues due to park'n'ride catchment, plus development potential, plus costs less operationally and from a capital perspective.
That is why we need a study, for one, because we have no answers to these questions about either alignment. One thing we do know: with the Nose Creek alignment, the assumption is that the current N-S buses on in the central corridor south of 96th Ave remain in place. Park and ride driving traffic is a bit of a misnomer anyways, only about 10% of LRT riders use P&R.

As for the land to support density, it is called single family homes, which will be assembled by market forces.

In any case, there is a transit thread.
     
     
  #2003  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 8:22 PM
yads yads is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 109
Thanks Boris. I did email him, but I got a reply saying that they have received a huge volume of emails and are trying their hardest to reply. I know I probably shouldn't have left it to the last minute. Was hoping someone close to the campaign may have seen the question and replied.
     
     
  #2004  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 8:23 PM
Boris2k7's Avatar
Boris2k7 Boris2k7 is offline
Majestic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 11,960
Ah, that's too bad. Hopefully he can get to you quickly enough then. Might as well have (potentially) two more informed voters.
__________________
"The only thing that gets me through our winters is the knowledge that they're the only thing keeping us free of giant ass spiders." -MonkeyRonin

Flickr
     
     
  #2005  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 8:35 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by yads View Post
Does anyone know what Nenshi's stance is on (low income) senior's issues? Barb has a specific point to establish a seniors advisory council. I haven't seen anything specific from Nenshi. I'm taking my non-English speaking grandparents to vote today and while I can just tell them to blindly vote Nenshi, I'd feel a lot better about doing that if I knew what his policy on the matter was.
I don't know exactly, but at the debate at Kerby Centre he was talking a lot about strategies in achieving affordable housing both through the private, public and non-profit sectors.

He also talks about transit accessibility as part of being key to overall quality of life and affordability for seniors.

Also some details here in this platform piece:

http://www.nenshi.ca/new/wp-content/uplo..._Equal_Opportunity-Nenshi_for_Mayor1.pdf

Of course a good secondary suites policy (one that allows so called "granny-flats") is also something he strongly supports.


Hope that helps a bit.
     
     
  #2006  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 8:52 PM
outoftheice outoftheice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 914
@Radley: I am confused. You say you're voting for Higgins because of her support for Plan It. Your criticisms of density growth opportunities along Centre Street are fair, however dramatically increasing density along the Centre Street urban corridor forms one of the main pillars of Plan It. How can you argue that we should move forward with Plan It if you don't believe we can achieve one of its main goals?

In addition, I'd encourage you to visit http://www.growsmart.ca for a more indepth case of why a Centre Street LRT route makes sense. I'd also welcome continuing the discussion about the NC LRT in either of the two related threads:

Calgary Public Transit:
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=178402&page=62

NC LRT Advocacy:
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=168710&page=9
     
     
  #2007  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 8:54 PM
yads yads is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 109
Thanks Wooster.
     
     
  #2008  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 9:23 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,162
I don't think anyone is going to convince Radley to vote for anyone but Higgins, and honestly compared to most pro-Higgins people I've talked to he's more informed in orders of magnitude (most others are "it would be nice to have a woman")
I'm focussing my efforts on the many people I know who don't tend to vote/care, just from some texting today I've found they kind of just want someone to tell them who to vote for and then they'll go do it, they just don't want to make the effort figuring out who.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
     
     
  #2009  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 9:27 PM
Ramsayfarian's Avatar
Ramsayfarian Ramsayfarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radley77 View Post
Joe Ceci, Ward 9 alderman, has just endorsed his support for Barb Higgins.

djkelly‎: RT @hawk4calgary: Joe Ceci endorses @Barb_Higgins. #yycvote #yyc

I know some have cited her lack of political experience as being an issue. Having two previous alderman (Hawkesworth as well) support her means that they think she can be an effective mayor as a part of city council.
He also supported Hawkesworth, which caused to me to question his sanity. It might also mean that she's cut them both deals as they're both going to be currently unemployed after this election.
     
     
  #2010  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 10:18 PM
Robert in Calgary Robert in Calgary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radley77 View Post
Bob Hawkesworth has been the steward of Calgary's LRT system for years.
I'm sorry Radley. I'm more of a champion for Calgary's LRT system than Bob Hawkesworth has ever been or ever will be.

We are going to stop Nose Creek LRT because it is a plainly stupid route. I've been fighting it for years and I'm not planning on stopping.

It's going to be some sort of a Centre Street Route.
     
     
  #2011  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 10:33 PM
Robert in Calgary Robert in Calgary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 86
In 2006 I spent over $1000 producing my own report giving city hall options on North Central LRT.

I included a quote from the "North Central Calgary Corridor Transit Review", the bottom of page 25.

"The line would connect with Northeast LRT at Memorial Drive just east of the Calgary Zoo station. Northeast LRT and the Deerfoot Tr./Memorial Dr. interchange were designed to permit this connection."

South opened in 1981, NE in 1984. We have a clear indication that planners were taking it for granted North Central LRT would go up the Nose Creek Valley.

This supports my contention that there never has been a genuine effort at city hall to find a route up Centre Street.

30 years of doing nothing. SE LRT will benefit me. Calgary needs North Central more. We need a Centre Street route.

The best way to make a good idea fail is to do nothing to make it succeed.

City hall is very good at that. ie airport tunnel
     
     
  #2012  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 10:39 PM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is offline
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,450
Rob, agreed about your comments 100% immediately above (4:33 post). I have put in a request to the City of Calgary for more documentation on the LRT route decision analysis. I would like to see a better transit solution come up with for Centre Street; I believe there is a better business case for the Nose Creek route. There needs to be a study to determine the economic viability of each option to reevaluate and underpin either decision. This should be an urgent matter because there is already work going on to study cost/benefit analysis of multiple alignments in the Nose Creek. I will post more in the NC LRT advocacy thread if I get a reply from city administration.

Last edited by Radley77; Oct 13, 2010 at 10:53 PM.
     
     
  #2013  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 11:26 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,689
For those interested, here's new videos on most of Nenshi's "Better Ideas"

First - Key Platform Themes:
Video Link



#1 – Nenshi proposes common-sense policy on secondary suites
Video Link


Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/116

#2 – Nenshi proposes audit changes; brings transparency to city hall
Video Link


Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/120

#3 – Calgary will be the best place in Canada to start and grow a business
Video Link


Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/189

Full Policy:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/wp-content/uplo...ace-to-do-Business-Nenshi-for-Mayor1.pdf

#4 – Calgarians will have convenient, quick access to their airport.
Video Link


Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/135

Fully Policy:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Better-Idea-4-Access-to-Airport.pdf

#5 – Calgary Transit will be a preferred choice, not the last choice.
Video Link


Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/141

Fully Policy:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/wp-content/uplo...it-Preferred-Choice-Nenshi-for-Mayor.pdf

#6 – Political campaigns should be about the best ideas, not the most money
Video Link


Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/153

Full Policy:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/wp-content/uplo...aign-Finance-Reform-Nenshi-for-Mayor.pdf

#7 – Calgary will be a city of sustainable, walkable, livable, complete communities
Video Link


Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/159

Fully Policy:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/wp-content/uplo...Term-Sustainability-Nenshi-for-Mayor.pdf

#8 – Calgary City Council will be more transparent, more efficient, and easier for citizens to engage
Video Link


Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/183

Full Policy:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/wp-content/uplo...City-Council-Reform-Nenshi-for-Mayor.pdf

#9 – Calgarians will be able to get around easily by any mode of transportation
Video Link


Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/232

Full Policy:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Better-Idea-9-Mobility-Nenshi-for-Mayor.pdf

#10 – Calgary will reduce the number of people living in poverty and ensure opportunity for all

Video Link


Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/245

Full Policy:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/wp-content/uplo..._Equal_Opportunity-Nenshi_for_Mayor1.pdf

#11 – Calgary will be a city where every neighbourhood is a safe neighbourhood
No Video Yet

Summary:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/2010/422

Full Policy:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/wp-content/uplo...ighbourhood_is_a_safe_neighbourhood1.pdf


Podcasts:
http://www.nenshi.ca/new/policy/podcast
     
     
  #2014  
Old Posted Oct 13, 2010, 11:33 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by srperrycgy View Post
Umm... no. He voted against extending the NE LRT to Saddleridge and the NW LRT to Tuscany on Nov. 20 , 2007. Nice and hypocritical when he is, oops, sorry WAS using the SE LRT in his campaign.
In all fairness, I am a huge transit advocate (many of you know this about me) and I would have voted against both extensions. But can we move this to the transit thread or the NCLRT thread. I will copy this response to both.
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
     
     
  #2015  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2010, 1:33 AM
Ferreth Ferreth is offline
IMHO
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 882
So, considering that the Eyeopener micro-debate between Barb, Naheed, and Ric might be the only one, I'm wondering how people think the debate went in terms of influencing the vote.

I feel that Naheed took it to Ric quite well, however, he was able to deflect much, forcing Naheed to concede on several points. Barb seemed to be lost in the middle - I saw this as a Ric vs Naheed fight for the most part. I think Ric actually trumped Naheed in the beginning pointing out that if you don't have a safe, affordable place to live, well then all the arts culture and parks don't mean much. Ric's comment on Naheed destroying the Single Family Home was over the top - less extreme phrasing might have scored points - a lot of people in Calgary are afraid of loosing the option of buying a house out in the 'burbs.

Overall, tie for Ric and Naheed, Barb likely lost a point or two in the polls based on this debate.
__________________
---
My Flickr account
My Ratsofrass blog
     
     
  #2016  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2010, 2:11 AM
LFRENCH's Avatar
LFRENCH LFRENCH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferreth View Post
I feel that Naheed took it to Ric quite well, however, he was able to deflect much, forcing Naheed to concede on several points. Barb seemed to be lost in the middle - I saw this as a Ric vs Naheed fight for the most part. I think Ric actually trumped Naheed in the beginning pointing out that if you don't have a safe, affordable place to live, well then all the arts culture and parks don't mean much. Ric's comment on Naheed destroying the Single Family Home was over the top - less extreme phrasing might have scored points - a lot of people in Calgary are afraid of loosing the option of buying a house out in the 'burbs.

Overall, tie for Ric and Naheed, Barb likely lost a point or two in the polls based on this debate.
Maybe its just me, but I fail to see Ric's point on this. Calgary is a fairly safe place as it stands, and it still seems fairly affordable to me. Can work be done? sure but to put off arts and culture to make a already safe place safer seems like it isn't worth the trade off for me.
     
     
  #2017  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2010, 2:44 AM
Ramsayfarian's Avatar
Ramsayfarian Ramsayfarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferreth View Post
So, considering that the Eyeopener micro-debate between Barb, Naheed, and Ric might be the only one, I'm wondering how people think the debate went in terms of influencing the vote.

I feel that Naheed took it to Ric quite well, however, he was able to deflect much, forcing Naheed to concede on several points. Barb seemed to be lost in the middle - I saw this as a Ric vs Naheed fight for the most part. I think Ric actually trumped Naheed in the beginning pointing out that if you don't have a safe, affordable place to live, well then all the arts culture and parks don't mean much. Ric's comment on Naheed destroying the Single Family Home was over the top - less extreme phrasing might have scored points - a lot of people in Calgary are afraid of loosing the option of buying a house out in the 'burbs.

Overall, tie for Ric and Naheed, Barb likely lost a point or two in the polls based on this debate.
I thought Naheed mopped the floor with both of them. You could tell Naheed has been waiting for this moment. He was fast and furious with the great ideas and showing what's wrong with City Council. By the end of it, I think Naheed might have won McIver's vote. Misses WHo-iggens on the other hand now realizes that she maybe she should of took a leave of absence from her news gig instead of resigning.

I think because Naheed has been chomping at the bit for a debate, he came across as bit overpowering. To me it seemed like he was trying to talk over the others a lot more than they over him. The Bedshitters are not going to like "that dark fella" beating up on poor Barbara.
     
     
  #2018  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2010, 2:58 AM
Ferreth Ferreth is offline
IMHO
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 882
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFRENCH View Post
Maybe its just me, but I fail to see Ric's point on this. Calgary is a fairly safe place as it stands, and it still seems fairly affordable to me. Can work be done? sure but to put off arts and culture to make a already safe place safer seems like it isn't worth the trade off for me.
I will agree that Calgary is a safe place, but affordable, not so much. Ric's point plays well to those who don't think Calgary is a safe place, and there seem to be lots of those out there. With more time, Nenshi might have been able to point out that arts and culture can be tools to reduce crime, and Ric might have been able to point out that Artists are moving away from the city because it's so gosh darn expensive, but with 12 minutes we only got the appetizer part of the debate unfortunately.
__________________
---
My Flickr account
My Ratsofrass blog
     
     
  #2019  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2010, 3:08 AM
LFRENCH's Avatar
LFRENCH LFRENCH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferreth View Post
I will agree that Calgary is a safe place, but affordable, not so much. Ric's point plays well to those who don't think Calgary is a safe place, and there seem to be lots of those out there. With more time, Nenshi might have been able to point out that arts and culture can be tools to reduce crime, and Ric might have been able to point out that Artists are moving away from the city because it's so gosh darn expensive, but with 12 minutes we only got the appetizer part of the debate unfortunately.
I wouldn't say artists are moving because of the high costs of living in the city. I personally see more of a problem with the lack of support many of the artists here in the city get. I relocated here after living in San Francisco and being born and raised in Victoria/Vancouver. Both those regions are hugely more un affordable than Calgary yet many artists flock there.
     
     
  #2020  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2010, 6:38 AM
suburb suburb is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 945
A nice short article on the meteoric rise of one Naheed Nenshi ...

Quote:
From back of the pack to a real contender
Surging in polls, Naheed Nenshi has momentum
Published October 14, 2010 by Trevor Scott Howell in News

Third place. It’s certainly not the most coveted spot of any election race. But by mid-summer, it was the goal for Calgary mayoral hopeful Naheed Nenshi.

The Mount Royal University professor knew he had his work cut out for him just to place third. He didn’t have the face or name recognition of rival candidates Barb Higgins and Ald. Ric McIver. And early polls placed him dead last in the race.

But throughout the summer, Nenshi and his campaign team had been slogging it out. First, by gaining traction online using Twitter and Facebook. His team of eight researchers churned out policies called ‘Better Ideas.’ An army of 500 volunteers plastered the city with Nenshi lawn signs.

By mid-September, their work had paid off. A poll declared Nenshi in third spot. So, the team aimed for second. And now, with only days until the October 18 election, a new poll has him neck and neck with McIver and Higgins.

“The strategy we wrote right at the beginning, envisioned pretty much everything up till today,” says Nenshi. “And the shocking thing is that it has gone so perfectly, exactly as planned.”

A large part of that “strategy” was to publicly attack his opponents, chipping away at their past political records, or lack thereof, during mayoral forums. He came out swinging at the first forum on August 12 in Forest Lawn. While his rivals were playing it safe by sticking to their scripts and vague platforms, the Harvard graduate went on the attack.

“If we really look at the record, we see there's not much difference between Ald. Hawkesworth, Ald. Connelly and Ald. McIver,” Nenshi told the crowd.

Off in a corner his campaign director, lawyer Chima Nkemdirim, iPhone in hand, quickly tweeted the campaign’s account: “#yycvote Nenshi points out that hawksworth, mciver and connelly voted to gut plan-it in a backroom deal with the developers.”

It may seem insignificant to tweet with a maximum of 140 characters during the dog days of summer, but this was an integral part of Nenshi’s plan: Connect and lock-in the support of the politically hyper-engaged using social media tools and small informal meetings. The point? Win the younger Internet-savvy crowd over and hope they spread the word to their families, friends and colleagues.

“Everyone else said ‘Those 18-year-olds on Twitter and Facebook, no one cares about them,’” says Nkemdirim. “There are 600,000 in Calgary on Facebook. The average age of a person on Facebook is 35. We understood that and it has really worked to our advantage.”

The campaign’s legion of Facebook fans and Twitter followers grew in size and fervour — certainly more popular than any of Nenshi’s rivals. The Twitter hashtag #yycvote has largely become an echo chamber for Nenshi supporters — swarming like protective bees when their candidate is criticized. And yet, doubt still lingered about the effect this would ultimately have on election results.

“The biggest fallacy about this, and the place in which every single political scientist commenting on it has been wrong so far, is that they think people who are online are 18-year-old layabouts who will click a ‘Like’ button on a Facebook page and do nothing else,” says Nenshi. “They could not be more wrong.”

The campaign buzz gradually seeped into mainstream Calgary, and people began to embrace the campaign colour, with purple signs popping up on residential lawns and people wearing purple T-shirts and buttons. The campaign is now dubbed The Purple Revolution.

OTHER MAYORAL CANDIDATES

One undisputed election fact is that Nenshi — more than any other mayoral candidate — has pulled ahead from the bottom ranks at an astonishing rate. So, why haven’t his rivals gained as much steam?

For starters, early front-runners Ald. Ric McIver and TV news anchor Barb Higgins didn’t show up at so-called all-candidates’ forums. McIver had said he had prior commitments, usually fundraisers, and sometimes Higgins didn’t provide a reason.

Until September, McIver and Higgins were fairly low-key, except when McIver announced his candidacy with a splashy fundraiser attended by several hundred well-heeled businesspeople, land developers and influential political strategists — Calgary’s movers and shakers. The controversial alderman had a comfortable lead in an early poll — 30 points ahead of his nearest rival — until Higgins threw her hat into the ring on July 28.

When most mayoral hopefuls announced their candidacy, they didn’t have a clear, detailed platform. But as weeks passed, they rolled out specifics, typically issuing press releases, hoping their messages would get media play.

Ald. Bob Hawkesworth differentiated his campaign by stating he is not in favour of an airport tunnel, proposing to have buses shuttle travellers to and from the airport. Former oilman Wayne Stewart announced if he were elected, he would bring Calgary back to Olympic glory with a successful 2022 games bid. Ald. Joe Connolly promised to usher in a new era of democracy by using crowd sourcing to gather citizens’ ideas. And former alderman Jon Lord stumped a Triple E government: efficient, effective and ethical.

Higgins’s campaign went off the rails early last month, when she admitted to dropping “the ball internally, here,” by missing a key economic forum, then turfing her manager, Donn Lovett. She seemed to bounce back, holding her own forums in rented community halls, often not inviting the media and simply talking to voters. (Higgins did not respond to several requests for an interview.)

McIver has run a fairly low-key campaign, staying out of the limelight, while holding several fundraisers. Just days after Nenshi released a list of donors contributing to his campaign, McIver followed suit with his list — revealing many contributions are from land developers and house builders. Containing exact donation amounts next to contributors’ names, McIver’s list was far more detailed than Nenshi’s, which had only names and their vague donations — for example, a list of those who gave between $1,000 to $2,499 and others between $2,500 to $5,000, etc.

By and large, most mayoral candidates have been singing from the same song sheets: efficient snow removal; an accountable, transparent city council; better transportation; providing more arts and culture — all this, while keeping taxes under control. With candidates making similar promises and espousing similar ideas, this election may not be about issues.

“It has looked for a very long time as not so much an issues’ race, as a character or leadership race,” says Lori Williams, a political scientist at Mount Royal University. “An outsider who succeeds in persuading enough voters that they can do this differently will be appealing to a lot of people.”

A TURNING POINT

That “outsider” may be Nenshi. The first thing he did “differently,” setting his campaign apart from others, was that he challenged the police department, issuing a press release on September 23 that criticized McIver’s stance on the police budget. Nenshi questioned the size of the police budget and the city’s cost per officer.

Police Chief Rick Hanson quickly responded with his own press release, calling Nenshi’s numbers “inaccurate,” and the line of questioning “ill-informed” and “irresponsible.” (Hanson has since refused to publicly comment on the matter.)

The short-lived dust-up between Nenshi and the chief catapulted and solidified Nenshi’s campaign, turning him into a real contender.

“The fact that a police chief would come out and respond to something he had said made him look like someone who had a shot at the mayor’s chair,” says Williams.

Nenshi likely didn’t win any votes among the law-and-order crowd, nor did he score points with several mayoral rivals who responded by staunchly defending the chief and his police force.

The incident, says McIver, proves that Nenshi doesn’t have the political chops to run a city.

“He has no direct experience and he’s never run a municipality, and he hasn’t come up through the ranks like I have, ” says McIver. “He’s a good guy; he’s just not ready for this job.”

Yet, it was at this juncture that Nenshi claimed third spot in the polls; And it was at this point that he was gunning for second place.

ATTACKS FROM BELOW

Some candidates, miffed that they had been eclipsed by Nenshi, started taking potshots. City hall veteran and mayoral candidate Ald. Bob Hawkesworth created a Facebook page, called Know Nenshi, and posted edited video clips of Nenshi allegedly stating he’d sell Enmax for $1 billion — well below its reported value.

“All I’ve done is let people know what he has said and drawn attention to his words,” says Hawkesworth. “I’ll let people decide for themselves about Mr. Nenshi.”

The issue was fought out in a whirlwind of press releases by the Hawkesworth and Nenshi camps — the latest one sent out by Hawkesworth on October 5, accusing Nenshi of defamation.

“Not only are these statements by Naheed Nenshi defamatory and damaging to my reputation, they are an attempt to cover up Mr. Nenshi’s repeated public statements that he would sell off Enmax,” Hawkesworth stated.

Nenshi scoffs at the idea of selling the public utility, calling Hawkesworth’s tactics “unbelievably irresponsible”; the actions, he says, represent what people loathe about politics.

“Here is a completely irrelevant candidate to this election, sitting at spitting distance of zero in the polls and attempting to ruin everything else for everyone for no particular reason,” he adds.

Days after making the defamation accusation, Hawkesworth conceded he has no chance of winning the election. "I'm not going to be Calgary's next mayor, barring some kind of miracle between now and next Monday," he told volunteers and the media last Tuesday. The following day, Hawkesworth threw his support behind Higgins.

AIMING FOR THE NO. 1 SPOT

Spurred by a recent surge in polls, Nenshi is now serious about clinching the top spot (a Leger Marketing poll released October 13 had McIver at 33 per cent, Higgins at 30 per cent and Nenshi at 30 per cent — that’s compared to a September 19 Leger poll, which had McIver at 42.8 per cent, Higgins at 28.2 per cent and Nenshi at 8.2 per cent).

“The only fear that we have right now is that we might run out of runway,” he says. “If this election were a month from now, I would win in a landslide because of the momentum.”

In the last week of campaigning, mayoral candidates continue to roll out their platforms.

On October 11, Higgins pledged to “open up city hall” with transparency. “There should be nothing hidden and nothing to hide,” she said.

And on October 12, Lord said city hall must grapple with sustainability planning. “This is an issue that needs to be tackled as a priority for the new council, and as mayor, I have a plan to do it,” he said.

Communication in this election has been a key element — something that the Nenshi camp understands and has capitalized on: For weeks, his communication director, Stephen Carter, has been sending daily emails to media, aggressively attacking municipal issues, sometimes criticizing mayoral rivals and their platform ideas.

Nenshi’s meteoric rise in the polls is “absolutely astonishing,” says Williams. However, much of his support rests with younger voters, who historically shy away from the ballot box.

“If he actually gets them out to vote and there are enough of them, it could push him over the top,” says Williams. “At this point it really depends on whose people show up at the ballot box.”

Gaining so much momentum, Nenshi plans to stay the course.

"We're just going to keep on doing what we do," Nenshi says, referring to the final days of the race. "My path forward is very straightforward: Have more people hear my message."
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Calgary Issues, Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:20 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.