Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext
I am quite awake, thank you.
The meeting of the Committee is this week and submissions are being solicited from the public for that meeting. Why bother with the same exercise if the decision has already been made. It's been well documented by open mic that Gregor doesn't like bothering with the public's opinion. Perhaps he should have some respect for their time and not waste it if its a foregone conclusion.
|
Actually, a survey of people along Hornby shows that the majority (56%) supported the bike lane while only 30% were opposed.
http://www.vancouversun.com/travel/P...118/story.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext
On another note, News1130 reports this morning that 92% of Hornby St. businesses who responded to their survey expect significant losses from the bike lane.
|
The CFIB "survey" is flawed in several ways:
- It was started before the city consulted with most of the businesses
- It was started before the city released the plans last week that address many of the concerns of the businesses
- Laura Jones issued very negative statements on the bike lane which likely influenced the survey results
- The survey only asked if businesses what their losses might be. It did not ask what the gains might be
- They did not approach all the businesses along Hornby so the results are likely skewed towards businesses that do not like the lanes
Similar surveys on Bloor street in Toronto showed
http://www.cleanairpartnership.org/p...es-parking.pdf that a greater number businesses thought that bike lanes would improve business. I suspect if a similar scientifically valid survey was done here on the actually plans for Hornby, the support for the bike lane would be much higher. A study
http://www.emilydrennen.org/research_trans.shtml done in San Francisco four and a half years after the bike lanes were built indicated that the vast majority of the businesses expressed support for the bike lanes.