HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1781  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2010, 8:24 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
I don't know if 35 storeys will fly with the decision makers. There wouldn't be any issue if it included MEC's King St frontage but this is mid block between two avenues.
Just curious - why would that make a difference?
     
     
  #1782  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2010, 11:31 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,806
Yes I agree... this mid-block thiing sounds very New York City to me...
     
     
  #1783  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2010, 12:09 AM
Traynor's Avatar
Traynor Traynor is offline
Back to Basics
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,226
I love the interiors of this Montreal proposal.

NO STUPID ROUND COLUMNS!!!!

I wish the people who buy condos in Toronto understood that interior round columns are an "Affectation" of urbanism and completely unnecessary. But the brain-dead doofises that buy here think they need them, or they don't live all "downtowny hip and urban" and the like.

I find interior round columns a nasty pastiche of industrial lofts and only belong in true "Hard Lofts" which are conversions from industrial space. They waste floor space and are impossible to plan furniture around.


Last edited by Traynor; Oct 1, 2010 at 2:35 AM. Reason: sp
     
     
  #1784  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2010, 2:34 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramako View Post
Just curious - why would that make a difference?
Charlotte doesn't have the capacity to handle such a dense proposal. It already is used as an on street, short turn, streetcar loop and it's probably too close to Spadina/Peter to add signaled interesection at King and Adelaide. Of course I could write paragraphs on why this is guarranteed to be yet another Lamb OMB case but, I don't have the time. His win/loss record before this arbitrary body is pretty abyssmal all things consider too.
     
     
  #1785  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2010, 4:09 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by interchange42 View Post
As has been mentioned above, Edilcan is launching the second phase of their One Valhalla project. This time it's the taller centre tower of the project, which was originally approved at 29 storeys, but which now seems to have grown to 32 storeys. Here's the rendering:




For your edification, the following is basically a rearrangement and de-hyping of the press release that accompanied the renders. Some good info can be found within!

Thunderbird's glass exterior is strongly reminiscent of Edlican's The Met on Carlton east of Yonge, also by Page + Steele / IBI Architects. Landscaping is by Schollen & Company Inc. The towers will rise from a one-acre landscaped podium and will radiate from a landscaped courtyard at ground-level with stone walls, raised planters, decorative lighting and a playground. “Thunderbird” was chosen for the second tower because of its association with classic and iconic design that also recaptures that time. Sporty and luxurious, the car manufactured by the Ford Motor Company beginning in 1955 was billed as a personal luxury car, which appealed to a new market niche, like the Inn, which was one of Toronto’s first motor inns. A few of the original Inn’s more interesting heritage artifacts will be incorporated into the new condominium residences. Edilcan is working with Heritage Preservation Services to showcase these elements in the best possible way. For example, some of the stonework from the original George Robb-designed buildings is being reclaimed and reused. Demolition on the original Inn will begin this fall so that excavation for One Valhalla can start.

The buildings’ extensive amenities are appointed by Munge Leung, the majority of which will be located in Thunderbird. Munge Leung appointed all the building’s social and recreational spaces with respect for the original Valhalla Inn on the site and its era, while keeping the design contemporary. The Inn was characterized by the Scandinavian design that was popular when it was built in 1963. The indoor pool, splash pool and hot tub will be adjacent to the patio on the rooftop podium, which means residents will be able to swim and look out or walk out onto this meticulously landscaped area for a rejuvenating experience. The Resident’s Club bar and lounge also has a walkout to the ambiance of a landscaped podium. Amenities extend to a theatre, fitness facilities, business/study centres complete with Wi-Fi, media/library lounge, children’s activity room, guest suites, and landscaped terrace rooftop with barbecue areas and an outdoor children’s play area.










Thunderbird’s one-bedroom, one-bedroom + den, two-bedroom and two-bedroom + study designs will be priced from the low $200,000s (including parking). One Valhalla will also ultimately include 68 contemporary private two and three-storey townhomes. Some suites in Phase 1 are still available. You may tour the two Munge Leung-appointed model suites. The finishes are of a high quality so that practically everything in the models is standard. Designed to appeal to different sensibilities, the two-bedroom + den model leans toward the classic and traditional, and the one-bedroom design is more modern, with retro touches in table bases and lighting. Both models have been well received!
from interchange42 at UT
     
     
  #1786  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2010, 9:14 PM
Cambridgite
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
City Centre Condominiums, Kitchener

After years of negotiations with the city, the development has finally been approved and construction on the sales trailer is well under way.

http://www.citycentreliving.ca/

From inside the preview centre

View from Duke/Young


Source: Urban Waterloo at 'Wonderful Waterloo'

Last edited by Cambridgite; Oct 3, 2010 at 10:20 PM. Reason: wrong img link
     
     
  #1787  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2010, 7:34 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicko999 View Post
I thought the receptionist looked familiar, lol:

300 Front Street, Toronto

www.tridel.com
     
     
  #1788  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2010, 9:18 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Another for Toronto:

Yorkville Condominiums

Storeys: 28 (note: there is a proposal to increase height by 3 storeys)
Location: 32 Davenport Road @ McMurrich
Developer: Lifetime Developments
Architect: Rudy Wallman

     
     
  #1789  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2010, 9:19 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Holy 🞵🞵🞵🞵, it doesn't stop!!! - Toronto is ONFYR! even as the country is slipping back into recession.

goodlord!
     
     
  #1790  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2010, 9:29 PM
Dwils01's Avatar
Dwils01 Dwils01 is offline
Urban Fanactic
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 3,285
That is a very nice tower. I like the design of this one. Maybe becuase this one has more than just green glass cladding the whole building.
     
     
  #1791  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2010, 9:37 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwils01 View Post
That is a very nice tower. I like the design of this one. Maybe becuase this one has more than just green glass cladding the whole building.
Indeed. A little colour can go a long way in a sea of blue/green.
     
     
  #1792  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2010, 6:18 AM
urbandreamer's Avatar
urbandreamer urbandreamer is offline
recession proof
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,656
     
     
  #1793  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2010, 12:32 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
glad to see the first X2 design recycled
     
     
  #1794  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2010, 12:41 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
Re: Yorkville Residences

Dare I say it considering the rarity of a consensus? The rose and bronze aren't doing it for me. Also protuding boxes are so done. How many towers have that roof line?
     
     
  #1795  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2010, 2:08 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Re: Yorkville Residences

Dare I say it considering the rarity of a consensus? The rose and bronze aren't doing it for me. Also protuding boxes are so done. How many towers have that roof line?
It's funny... the more I stare at that rendering and break down the elements of the tower, the more I agree with you. The design is a bit stale and lacks a certain elegance. But for some reason I still love it. I think it goes to show just how refreshing it is to see a little bit of colour and mixed material on a proposal these days.
     
     
  #1796  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2010, 3:27 PM
Cambridgite
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
City Centre Condominiums, Kitchener

A follow-up on the model I posted yesterday. Here is the rending, posted by Urban Waterloo of 'Wonderful Waterloo'.



Word has it that one of the penthouses have already sold, and the sales office has only been open for a few days now.
     
     
  #1797  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2010, 5:19 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramako View Post
It's funny... the more I stare at that rendering and break down the elements of the tower, the more I agree with you. The design is a bit stale and lacks a certain elegance. But for some reason I still love it. I think it goes to show just how refreshing it is to see a little bit of colour and mixed material on a proposal these days.
One thing for certain, it will take several dozen residential buildings for me to tire of the Miesian inspired mullion/glass setup Wallman introduced with X.
     
     
  #1798  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2010, 5:58 PM
Ramako's Avatar
Ramako Ramako is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
One thing for certain, it will take several dozen residential buildings for me to tire of the Miesian inspired mullion/glass setup Wallman introduced with X.
Isn't X a Clewes and X2 a Wallman?
     
     
  #1799  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2010, 7:21 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
Re: Yorkville residences... I'll never understand the obsession with protruding boxes, or providing a cozy roof overhang for non-existant residents of the mechanical room/elevator overrun. How it sits on the podium is kinda lame too. This one is better than most though, and I like that the "solid" side is fenestrated. Better than stuff like Vision, that seem use the "L" shape to separate the architectural part from the "rest" of the building.
     
     
  #1800  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2010, 7:32 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,127
Yorkville - Fairmont Pacific Rim called and wants its cleaned plans back.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:21 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.