HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    One World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9421  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2010, 8:45 PM
GertElim's Avatar
GertElim GertElim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Elim, The Netherlands
Posts: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
its funny, i just watched the trailer for money never sleeps 2, and it had a clip of the main character in the wintergarden, with 1wtc behind him. because of what 1wtc looks like, i can tell that that it was filmed in mid-september 2009.


It was filmed in the beginning of November, because the 2 flags were there the first two weeks of November. Check this one: (©Morrongiello)

This one was taken November 2nd.
     
     
  #9422  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2010, 9:58 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,884
all i could see is that first pic, and as i didn't notice the flag, and i from what i remember all the lobby beams (if thats what they're called) were in place mid-september.
     
     
  #9423  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2010, 10:17 PM
BStyles BStyles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 557
1WTC is starting to get too large for the PA's webcam! Somebody better go up there and tilt it up a notch.
     
     
  #9424  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 12:22 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,170
http://www.downtownexpress.com/de_381/durstwins.html

Durst wins One W.T.C. bid

BY Aline Reynolds
August 11 - 17, 2010


Quote:
The Port Authority Board of Commissioners finalized the equity agreement with the Durst Organization for developing and managing One World Trade Center, the 102-story tower slated for completion in 2013.

The announcement, made at last Thursday’s Board meeting, comes one month after the Port selected Durst for the One W.T.C. development job over several other high-profile candidates.

The deal requires Durst to invest $100 million, and up to a total of $300 million down the line, in the project. Durst will receive a return determined by its final investment – or what real estate experts refer to as “equity interest” – and its performance in developing, managing and leasing the tower. The Port Authority will remain responsible for the bulk of the financing, insurance, and capital expenditures related to the project, in addition to the design and construction of the building’s core and shell.

Durst and the Port Authority will start collaborating immediately on One W.T.C. under an interim agreement, the details of which will be ironed out in the coming months.

“We believe that establishing a joint venture with a recognized world-class real estate firm with experience in developing large-scale commercial office space will reposition One W.T.C. in the market,” said Michael Francois, chief of real estate development at the Port Authority. “Private sector involvement with equity participation will increase [the Port Authority’s] economic competitiveness.”

Durst will begin accruing profits from One W.T.C. once the building is nearly fully occupied with office tenants, which is expected to occur by 2017.

A family-run company, Durst manages 10 million square feet of commercial office space around the city, 97 percent of which is occupied by tenants, according to Jordan Barowitz, director of external affairs for the company. Durst recently developed the 2.1 million-square-foot Bank of America building at One Bryant Park at 42nd Street and the 1.6 million square foot building at Four Times Square, current home to publishing giant Condé Nast.

“They have a proven track record, and large, green office buildings,” Francois said.

Other real estate developers vying for the project included Related Companies, which sources say had a more elaborate plan for the interior of One W.T.C.

“While we are disappointed and thought we offered a great vision for this iconic destination and for Lower Manhattan, we wish the Port Authority and their new partner well,” Related Companies C.E.O. and founder Stephen Ross said in a statement.

Related is known for building the Time Warner Center at Columbus Circle.

The Port Authority wouldn’t comment directly on their selection of Durst over Related, but Francois said, “Principals, Douglas and Jody Durst, have a high degree of involvement in all aspects of the Durst’s business. The organization maintains an excellence track record with New York-based large block tenants.”

Construction of One W.T.C. is now at the 34th floor, around 340 feet above street level, according to the Steve Coleman, spokesperson for the Port Authority. The future 1,776-foot-high tower, valued at around $2 billion, will have 2.6 million square feet of office space, around 40 percent of which already has commitments from two government agencies, the New York State Office of General Services and the United States General Services Administration.

Only days before the agreement with Durst, Condé Nast announced tentative plans to move to the future One W.T.C. in 2014. If the deal goes through, the publishing company would become the second private tenant of the tower, following Vantone Real Estate, a Chinese real estate company that has signed a lease for 190,000 square feet of space. Durst is not involved in the lease negotiation with Condé Nast, according to Barowitz.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #9425  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 1:34 AM
Krases's Avatar
Krases Krases is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,226
This thing really only costs 2 billion dollars? I am actually surprised at that. Some of the projects in Vegas before the recession cost over 10 billion, or nearly 3.5 for one giant tower. Imagine if the tower had that sort of budget.
__________________
There are many things money can buy. But one thing money can't buy is your momma, she's for free and everyone knows it.
     
     
  #9426  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 1:52 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,884
yes, but they're not spending budget money on furnishing the building, only building the frame, elavators and lobby. all the floors have to be furnished by their tenants....
     
     
  #9427  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 4:49 AM
eXodius's Avatar
eXodius eXodius is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
I've noticed the towers in other places, such as comics and a movie or two. Everyone anticipates the new WTC...


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5guKwKI8PxYTDvCbeeRF9JVZnvLZQD9HGQIT00
Noticed this in that article:

Quote:
When the museum opens in 2012, the tour will start at an above-ground glass pavilion, where a 665-foot long "ribbon," or gently sloped ramp, will carry visitors through the site.
Wasn't there an article posted not long ago saying it was practically guaranteed that we'd see the memorial opened on the 10th anniversary?
     
     
  #9428  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 5:18 AM
JSsocal JSsocal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 717
Quote:
Originally Posted by eXodius View Post
Noticed this in that article:



Wasn't there an article posted not long ago saying it was practically guaranteed that we'd see the memorial opened on the 10th anniversary?
Well yes the Memorial will be open to the public; that is, the plaza should be just about complete, and certainly open to the public. The actual underground museum was originally intended to open sometime in 2012. That isn't to say they might not be done earlier in 2012 as opposed to later.
     
     
  #9429  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 5:33 AM
Bucktown718's Avatar
Bucktown718 Bucktown718 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 296
By GreenwichBoy @WNY



roccocell
__________________
"I drank Moet with Medusa, give her shotguns in hell From the spliff that I lift and inhale"
     
     
  #9430  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 1:36 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,170
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #9431  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 3:37 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
Hey look, it's a little tiny World Trade Center!
     
     
  #9432  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 5:19 PM
pico44's Avatar
pico44 pico44 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post


Wow, that view of Goldman didn't last very long did it? Thankfully that was its least flattering side.
     
     
  #9433  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 7:30 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,170
^ And the BV building has seen a lot of change in that particular area of Manhattan over the years...

wtc.com (Aug 5)

__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #9434  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 8:06 PM
rich_200's Avatar
rich_200 rich_200 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 4,143
It's starting to look really big
     
     
  #9435  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 8:30 PM
Yael's Avatar
Yael Yael is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco!!!
Posts: 631
Right now this area looks kind of dirty, I can't wait to see all of the skyscrapers
and the green areas, and the fountains right?? in Ground Zero.
__________________
Reforma 432 Official Website
     
     
  #9436  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2010, 11:47 PM
Traynor's Avatar
Traynor Traynor is offline
Back to Basics
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,226
Lately, no matter how many angles I see of the footprints of the original WTC 1 and 2, I think they look too small for the original buildings. As if they are only 4/5ths scale.

Is it my imagination, just an optical illusion or are they really slightly smaller?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
^ And the BV building has seen a lot of change in that particular area of Manhattan over the years...

wtc.com (Aug 5)

     
     
  #9437  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2010, 1:00 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
whats that green patch by the memorial pool to the right?
     
     
  #9438  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2010, 2:29 AM
JSsocal JSsocal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traynor View Post
Lately, no matter how many angles I see of the footprints of the original WTC 1 and 2, I think they look too small for the original buildings. As if they are only 4/5ths scale.

Is it my imagination, just an optical illusion or are they really slightly smaller?
No you're spot on they are in fact slightly smaller. Supposedly logistical concerns concerning the street orientation and path orientation underground led to their size reduction. Regardless, with the wide railing around the pools they won't be distractingly smaller then the original footprint.
     
     
  #9439  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2010, 3:27 AM
sw5710 sw5710 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSsocal View Post
No you're spot on they are in fact slightly smaller. Supposedly logistical concerns concerning the street orientation and path orientation underground led to their size reduction. Regardless, with the wide railing around the pools they won't be distractingly smaller then the original footprint.
I think the footprints are 187' The original towers were 207'
     
     
  #9440  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2010, 5:24 AM
Bucktown718's Avatar
Bucktown718 Bucktown718 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 296
__________________
"I drank Moet with Medusa, give her shotguns in hell From the spliff that I lift and inhale"
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:41 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.