HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8581  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 2:52 AM
milanboy milanboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
KPMB, Smith Carter named AGS architects ...
Based on their combined oeuvre, it appears that the best we can expect for the AGS is something boxy and rectilinear. Their work is almost completely devoid of curves and angles.

Last edited by milanboy; Jun 25, 2010 at 6:01 AM. Reason: correct spelling error
     
     
  #8582  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 2:29 PM
Echoes's Avatar
Echoes Echoes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 4,530
Overpass at Preston and Circle praised
City plans to spend savings on interchange


By David Hutton, The StarPhoenix June 25, 2010

Using savings from the Circle Drive South project, the city is moving to build a $30-million interchange at Preston Avenue and Circle Drive.

The interchange, almost identical to the diamond-style flyover at the Clarence Avenue overpass, which cost $14 million, will be constructed before October 2012 if city council approves the project Monday night.

"There's a lot of anger coming my way and a lot of concern about that intersection being unsafe," said Coun. Bob Pringle. "Traffic flow, too, has been a real challenge. The volume of traffic is only going to continue to significantly increase as (the Stonebridge subdivision is finished). So I'm thrilled."

The city has been busy since the announcement that the Circle Drive South project came in close to $40 million under budget deciding what to do with the remaining funds.

The federal government took back its savings as part of an agreement, but there was still $23 million in funding remaining in the pot after land acquisition costs were taken into account.

To fund the rest, the city's administration is recommending taking $5.7 million from the interchange reserve, which is funded through a charge when land is purchased, and moving up future money slated for the construction of the Preston Avenue overpass in 2014.

Several options along the Circle Drive corridor in the west end were considered before the city's administration identified Circle Drive and Preston as the highest priority that fit best with the south bridge project.

"It's the next interchange that probably was going to be built on the Circle Drive system and has the most congestion at times," said Doug Drever, the Circle Drive South project manager

The aggressive construction schedule, which has the intersection slated to be opened by October 2012 with the rest of the Circle Drive South project, will mean there will be significant commuter delays in the area.

But it also ensures the two major roadway projects are done simultaneously so the neighbourhood only experiences the detours once, Drever said.

Otherwise, the intersection would be built in 2014 and 2015 and cause five years of detours in the area.

"There will be two years of detours, but in the long run it will pay off," Drever said.

An interchange has been planned since the south portion of Circle Drive was constructed in the 1960s, with a functional plan completed 27 years ago in 1983. The intersection has become progressively busier as the Stonebridge area has flourished with construction faster than anticipated.

To build the interchange, Graham-Flatiron, the joint venture contractors, will lower Circle Drive and move it to the south at Preston, a move necessary to avoid nudging up against Eastview homes.

Stonebridge, which is expected to have between 13,000 and 15,000 people, began in 2005 and was expected to be complete by 2022, but is at least seven years ahead of schedule.

Circle Drive Alliance Church Pastor Wayne Andrie has watched the growth in his 20 years at the church. The rapid expansion of Stonebridge and the number of vehicles that now use the road has "increased enormously" in recent years, he said.

Many local seniors or students from Stonebridge cross the freeway on foot, bike or scooter and are often caught in the middle of the freeway, he said. Only recently were a walk light and a dedicated turning arrow installed. Three members of his congregation were in a major collision there turning left from Preston Avenue on to Circle Drive.

One person has died in a collision at the intersection in the past six years, SGI data shows.

"It's a dangerous intersection," Andrie said. "The critical issue is making it safer."

[email protected]

- - -

DRIVING DANGER?

Annual accident statistics for the intersection of Preston Avenue and Circle Drive

Year Collisions

2004: 22

2005: 25

2006: 15

2007: 31

2008: 18

2009*: 31

* Until August 31

Source: SGI

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

Read more: http://www.thestarphoenix.com/Overpass+praised/3198416/story.html#ixzz0rsJzKuDt
__________________
SASKATOON PHOTO TOURS
2013: [Part I] [Part II] | [2014] | [2016] | [2022-26]
     
     
  #8583  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 2:46 PM
jas321 jas321 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 38
Great to hear! I live in Stonebridge and often bike and that intersection is terrible.
     
     
  #8584  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 2:46 PM
kgc087's Avatar
kgc087 kgc087 is offline
Urban Dreamer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,128
City eyes recycling options

By Rory MacLean, The StarPhoenix

Read more: http://www.thestarphoenix.com/technology...options/3198411/story.html#ixzz0rsNwv1oK


A pamphlet being released by the City of Saskatoon puts the cost of a city-wide curbside recycling program at around $7 to $11 a month per household.

The newsletter, to be released this weekend, lays out four options for the city's recycling future, offering the cost of each.

Option 1 involves no change to the current recycling system of centralized depots, SARCAN and privately run curbside recycling. Option 2 would provide a subsidy to help households pay the fee for private curbside recycling. It is estimated this will cost the city about $1.75 million a year, or $1.75 a month per household, and would divert an estimated 10,000 tonnes of waste per year.

The third option involves expanding the current system of depots to allow glass and plastics to be collected in addition to the cardboard, paper, tin cans, milk cartons and jugs and beverage containers currently collected. This would cost about $3 a month per household and divert about 14,000 tonnes per year.

The last option, involving the adoption of a full curbside-recycling program, is expected to cost about half as much per month as currently charged by private operator Saskatoon Curbside Recycling and would divert approximately 26,000 tonnes of waste each year.

The $7 to $11 range offered in the pamphlet is much lower than figures suggested by councillors in the past.

"The truth is borne out in this leaflet that the cost of recycling is not as high as was being discussed by city council," said Sean Shaw, a geology researcher at the University of Saskatchewan who ran against Coun. Myles Heidt in Ward 4 last year. At the time Heidt opposed the adoption of curbside recycling, saying it would cost $20 to $30 per month.

"It's unfortunate that we had to hear this fear-mongering on costs during the elections. But what I'm glad to see with this leaflet is we're finally getting the real information out to people," said Shaw.

Saskatoon lags behind other mid-sized cities on the issue, he said.

"We're one of only two cities in Canada for our size that doesn't have a curbside recycling program, along with Regina. In Saskatoon, we divert 23 per cent of our residential waste from the landfill. Other cities are doing 50 per cent and they're aiming for 75 per cent."

The actual costs of the recycling options will likely be even less than suggested since it would be deferred by revenue earned through the sale of recyclable materials, says the pamphlet.

A new $7.5-million provincewide multi-material recycling program to be launched in 2011 would also provide a subsidy for the municipal programming, further reducing the cost of recycling.

But Mayor Don Atchison says the cost could actually be higher if the city were required to sort, and not just pick up, recyclables.

"My biggest concern throughout this is for low-income families and seniors on fixed incomes. Recycling should not be a hardship on those with lower incomes."

How people would actually pay for the services has not yet been worked out, but the option is between a utility system, where people would pay a fee similar to a water bill, or a tax-based system where residents would be charged based on a portion of their property taxes. The funding mechanism is set to be worked out following a series of public consultations planned for the fall.

In the meantime, the pamphlet is being distributed in the Sunday Sun and will also be available at City Hall, libraries, leisure facilities and SARCAN.

"The public is encouraged to get in touch with us, visit our website and take the online survey," said Kelly Goyer, environmental co-ordinator for the city.

People can also send comments to [email protected].

"This will be totally public driven," said Goyer.

"Which of these options do you want us to put our energy behind? This is a public program and it has to fit their needs and their lifestyle to succeed."

The goal is to have the consultations finished by October and the issue put to city council by November, he said.

[email protected]
© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

Read more: http://www.thestarphoenix.com/technology...options/3198411/story.html#ixzz0rsNZMCcQ
_______________________________________________________
I know this isn't construction related, but we did have a recycling conversation a while back. I really prefer option four. It has minimal financial impact on homeowners and could be integrated directly into utility bills or property taxes. The city would be reducing waste by an incredible amount. I think this should be a mandatory program as well.
__________________
Just be.
     
     
  #8585  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 6:05 PM
prairieguy prairieguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by milanboy View Post
Based on their combined oeuvre, it appears that the best we can expect for the AGS is something boxy and rectilinear. Their work is almost completely devoid of curves and angles.
That is my initial reaction, as well. When I went to their site hoping to find creative inspirational, maybe even cutting edge design, I was left with a pretty empty feeling. Everything boxy with not even a lot of use of glass or other reflective surface. Pretty mundane stuff.

Maybe the AGS will become their signature piece....here's hoping!!

Glad to hear about Preston/Circle Drive overpass. I also live in the vicinity and the traffic at that intersection has definitely been increasing since Stonbridge.
     
     
  #8586  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 7:35 PM
EarlyByrdProductions's Avatar
EarlyByrdProductions EarlyByrdProductions is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The S'toon & Marsella, Nicaragua
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Country View Post
^ Good news, I was hoping for KPMB.

More on the architecture front, Raymond Moriyama is in town for the RAIC conference. And he's not real impressed by the Lake Placid project - but seems to approve of River Landing overall.
Like many here I would love to see Lake Placid miraculously pull through, but after visiting San Fran, Seattle and hearing Moriyama, that space would make an ideal spot for those types of shops/ booths you see at the Wharf etc.

...not that it couldn't be done elsewhere along the river.
__________________
www.viyarte.com
     
     
  #8587  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 11:25 PM
shmakim shmakim is offline
Burb Dweller
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 243
GREAT NEWS that the recycling priority hasn't been completely lost in the shadow of big construction investments like U of S and Circle Drive. I know Atch has been dissed by CAVE dwellers for doing anything at all, and by others for putting construction ahead of recycling and sustainability, but I always had it in my mind that he would move on that priority once the big projects were secured. There's no lack of public voice on it, so it would seem a worthwhile priority. For myself, I'd love to pay $7 to 11 per month instead of the somewhat painful $200 a year to Curbside Recycling.
     
     
  #8588  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2010, 12:17 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 798
     
     
  #8589  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2010, 12:21 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyByrdProductions View Post
Like many here I would love to see Lake Placid miraculously pull through, but after visiting San Fran, Seattle and hearing Moriyama, that space would make an ideal spot for those types of shops/ booths you see at the Wharf etc.

...not that it couldn't be done elsewhere along the river.
Having been to many markets along the Pacific Coast I would have to say our Farmers Market has a pretty good start on that already and it's in close enough proximity to the river to give you the same experience.

To increase space the Traffic Bridge could be used for booths and trailers. Just close it to traffic every weekend throughout the summer.
     
     
  #8590  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2010, 12:22 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 798
Found this in the Vancouver Sun this morning. The first paragraph is a must read.

Soak up Canadian history in Saskatchewan
     
     
  #8591  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2010, 12:31 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgc087 View Post
I know this isn't construction related, but we did have a recycling conversation a while back. I really prefer option four. It has minimal financial impact on homeowners and could be integrated directly into utility bills or property taxes. The city would be reducing waste by an incredible amount. I think this should be a mandatory program as well.
I'm in for option 4 as well. Let's just take some responsibility and get it done.
     
     
  #8592  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2010, 12:39 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 798
Art Gallery of Saskatchewan

So it looks like we won't be getting anything like the Art Gallery of Alberta.

------------------------

Architects promise 'timeless' gallery

Mendel replacement to have 'sense of ownership'


An art gallery, says Bruce Kuwabara, the decorated architect who will lead the design of the Art Gallery of Saskatchewan (AGS), should not be judged by the photo that is taken mere hours before it is opened but how it is experienced decades later.

"I'm not interested in designing an object that looks like it fell from the sky," Kuwabara, in the city for the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada conference, said Friday during an interview at a downtown hotel. "If they want a crazy looking thing, I'm not doing it.

"You want something to have a certain sense of permanence."

Kuwabara -- widely regarded as one of Canada's top architects with Toronto-based firm KPMB -- will lead the design of the new south downtown gallery in a collaboration with Grant Van Iderstine of Winnipeg-based Smith Carter, a top Prairie firm. Kuwabara will design the building while Van Iderstine, the executive architect, will oversee the project. The consortium was the unanimous choice this week of the city selection committee and will begin work on the design of the estimated $58-million gallery over the next 18 months.

"This project has the potential to be a long-lasting memorable image that defines the city," said Van Iderstine. "All cities have those postcard (buildings) and this is potentially one of those. . . . We're not interested in doing monuments to ourselves that don't function well or building an orphan that sits there by itself. We're not building for the opening-day splash but want something that's going to have a sense of timelessness."

The Art Gallery of Saskatchewan from the beginning has been about functionality, not flash. The city brought in Toronto-based architect Michael Lundholm, who spent months working on a functional plan that will guide the design and ensure the building also works as a destination and winter haven for River Landing-goers.

Kuwabara said he plans to immerse himself in the city's history and culture, including consulting fellow Japanese-Canadian architect Raymond Moriyama's 1978 vision for the area, to ensure the design reflects the local context, the surrounding buildings and river and the place of the Mendel Art Gallery among Canadian art institutions.

The controversy surrounding the move from the Mendel's Spadina Crescent home to the south downtown means the designers must work to involve the public in the process to help give Saskatoon a sense of pride in the design, Van Iderstine said.

"We're not interested in shoving something down people's throats," he said. "The appreciation of this building is going to come out of a sense of ownership and a sense of participation. We're doing a lot of listening."

Big or small, modern galleries such as the AGS require certain things -- exhibition space for the permanent collection and travelling shows, storage room, teaching facilities, public areas for visitors and the ability to adapt to new media and technology that is becoming a driving force. Now, Canadian cultural institutions must also be almost entirely self-supporting with restaurants, shops and rentable areas; regardless of its size, the modern museum or gallery doubles as an event venue.

The challenge in Saskatoon, Kuwabara and Van Iderstine said, is to integrate the 65,000-square-foot building into its surroundings by ensuring, first, that it complements the Remai Arts Centre, which it will attach to and wrap around.

"Some people would have looked at the site and saw the existing theatre on the site and say 'it's ruined," Kuwabara said. "I'm the opposite. That's a challenge, but it's a good challenge that opens opportunities in design because of the opposition that's there. By design you have to resolve conflicts and create benefits to that very idea."

The gallery and theatre must function as "dance partners," Van Iderstine said.

The AGS must also consider its other surroundings, mainly the river that forms its backdrop, the architects agreed.

Ultimately, Kuwabara said, content and context should be one and the same for the art gallery to be a lasting and sustainable expression of the city.

"It's . . . (about) how the building really works over time because, guess what, people change," Kuwabara said. "You have to have a building that's flexible enough to adapt. It has to create value long-term. The last thing I want to do is create a gallery that has a short shelf life."

[email protected]

Bruce Kuwabara

The renowned architect has designed the recent restoration of the Canadian Museum of Nature, the oldest national museum, which reopened in Ottawa last month, Canada's National Ballet School and the Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art in Toronto. He teaches architecture at the University of Toronto and Harvard University.

Grant Van Iderstine

Van Iderstine served as the design architect for the celebrated Canadian Museum of Human Rights in Winnipeg while the Smith Carter firm worked alongside KPMB and Kuwabara on Manitoba Hydro Place, considered the most energy efficient office tower in the world and the Canadian Embassy in Berlin, Germany.



© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

Source

Last edited by Jerry; Jun 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM. Reason: just because
     
     
  #8593  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2010, 4:48 PM
WoodlandCritter WoodlandCritter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 345
Nice to see that we won't be getting an art gallery of alberta. As much as that architecture is fanciful and interesting to the eye. I like the approach this firm is going to be taking. Their work reminds me of the MoMA in New York and other gallerys like it. The National Ballet building they designed is pretty nice. As someone i think commented before, i also hope they add a little extra flare to their style though. Sounds like they are putting a lot of thought into it which is good.
     
     
  #8594  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2010, 2:43 PM
kgc087's Avatar
kgc087 kgc087 is offline
Urban Dreamer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,128
I like his approach as well. It's not conservative, it's innovative in the sense that he is really wanting to weave Saskatoon's and Saskatchewan's history into the building. I don't think the building will be boring, it will be well integrated into the area as well probably have more "green" applications then possible other designs. I'm excited to see the proposal!
__________________
Just be.
     
     
  #8595  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2010, 8:42 PM
Temperance Temperance is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 471
I think they'll do a good job. Their work on buildings like the Gardiner Museum, Royal Conservatory, and National Ballet School has all been very well-received by both the public and architectural critics.
     
     
  #8596  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2010, 3:36 PM
Echoes's Avatar
Echoes Echoes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 4,530
Joint Council Meeting

- Joint Meeting of Saskatoon City Council and The Council of the R.M. of Corman Park at 12:00 noon, TCU Place

Planning agreement 'new phase' for region
City, Corman Park rules mean development 'certainty' in buffer zone


By David Hutton, The StarPhoenix June 28, 2010

Longtime Saskatoon planner Bert Wellman recalls, in the mid-1950s, walking for miles around the outskirts of the city completing city hall's secret inventory of what existed in Cory, the surrounding municipality now known as Corman Park.

With no regulations governing development in the area, what Wellman discovered during his six months of daily walks east of present-day Preston Avenue and west of Avenue W -- and everywhere in between -- was a planner's nightmare: Shabby, dug-in shacks without water or sewer and long stretches of unregulated growth.

"It was totally haphazard," said Wellman, 79. "It was primitive."

After Wellman's study was discovered by Cory administration, rural politicians demanded answers of the city's secret growth agenda.

When tempers cooled, however, public meetings were held and, soon after, a mutual agreement was formed, striking the first planning agreement between Saskatoon and its neighbour that regulated what could be developed outside the city limits.

The city needed room to grow, Wellman said, and couldn't run into haphazard planning along the way. Led by Wellman, the agreement was updated once again in the early 1980s when the partners, wary of developers looking to build around the city's outskirts, decided not to allow any dense residential or commercial areas within one mile of the city limits.

"Urban growth should be within the city and anything else that goes out into Corman Park should be rural," Wellman said.

Council members from Saskatoon and the RM of Corman Park, the 2,000 square-kilometre municipality that surrounds the city, will vote today on a historic agreement that will eliminate that long-standing one-mile development buffer zone between the city and the municipality that encircles it, beginning the next phase of growth for the region and expanding on the work set in motion by Wellman's walk 55 years ago.

The agreement, a bylaw change to the Corman Park-Saskatoon community plan, sets out where future developments will be allowed in the area surrounding Saskatoon, paving the way for commercial, industrial and residential project spots previously off limits because of the regulations.

"(The one-mile buffer zone) was a simple policy to administer but it doesn't really address some of the situations where a proposal might actually work," said Laura Hartney, manager of Saskatoon's future growth section. "There's no magic to that distance. It was just simple to apply and so we wanted to look at something that would still be predictable but would also be flexible."

The buffer zone, in place since 1983, prevents large-scale residential and commercial developments in a 1.6- kilometre area around Saskatoon's city limits. The idea was to protect the area where Saskatoon would grow from developments that wouldn't fit with the city's plans. The new plan was initiated four years ago after the quagmire Saskatoon and Corman Park were in during the development of the Willows area, a proposal that forced the city to annex land to provide infrastructure to homes once thought impossible to service.

The new land use map still restricts development in areas where Saskatoon plans to grow for the next 75 years, primarily to the north and east of the city limits where nine new neighbourhoods are planned.

However, the city and Corman Park have now slated several areas in the planning district, primarily to the south, for future residential and commercial developments. The philosophy is to ensure developments are in areas close to existing roads that could be easily serviced, Hartney said.

The changes will likely clear the way for the redevelopment of Greenbryre Country Club, off Highway 16, which is expected to become an estates-style neighbourhood surrounding a scaled-back golf course. The course's owner can now submit a proposal for the development.

The agreement will allow Corman Park planners something more concrete when dealing with development applications, which have increased as the city has grown, said Bill Delainey, Corman Park senior planner.

There have been long debates about allowing urban-style developments such as apartment towers in Corman Park, but the new bylaw entrenches that housing be more rural and the focus will remain on expanding industrial and commercial endeavours, Delainey said.

Even potential commercial centres will be limited so big-box supercentres or supermarkets -- Walmart, Costco or Ikea, for example -- couldn't spring up as they are better suited for Saskatoon proper. Having city residents driving to the outskirts for groceries isn't sustainable planning, Delainey said.

"The greatest benefit is it provides a great deal of certainty that wasn't there before," Delainey said. "By providing certainty we are in a position now to do some long-range planning."

Both parties want to see residential and commercial developments clustered together and not spread throughout the region to take advantage of economies of scale, Hartney said.

"If we know where we're headed for the next 75 years then there are things that can be done in places where the city doesn't plan to grow," Hartney said.

"This really marks a new phase in the relationship between the two communities."

The plan drives home how the two areas aren't thinking in competitive terms and chasing the tax base that comes with development dollars in projects that don't make sense in a rural setting, Delainey said.

"Councils often look at the big dollars that could be brought in through tax revenue as opposed to looking at what benefits the region," he said. "This (plan) benefits the region."

[email protected]

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix


Read more: http://www.thestarphoenix.com/business/P...+region/3210581/story.html#ixzz0sA7NkEUR
__________________
SASKATOON PHOTO TOURS
2013: [Part I] [Part II] | [2014] | [2016] | [2022-26]
     
     
  #8597  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2010, 4:04 PM
Echoes's Avatar
Echoes Echoes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 4,530
Renderings of the Wolf Willow Cohousing project planned for a vacant block in King George. Looks like a nice project and great for the neighbourhood.




www.wolfwillowcohousing.ca
__________________
SASKATOON PHOTO TOURS
2013: [Part I] [Part II] | [2014] | [2016] | [2022-26]
     
     
  #8598  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2010, 4:22 PM
drm310's Avatar
drm310 drm310 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 650
Preston Crossing to expand

June 25, 2010


The university is moving forward with the fourth phase of development at Preston Crossing, with an application to re-zone 9.15 acres as retail land expected to go before Saskatoon city council this fall.

Judy Yungwirth, director of Corporate Administration, said the expansion will take place north of the existing Wal-Mart store and will involve a large hunting, fishing and camping outfitting store as the anchor tenant plus a smaller retail space, likely a restaurant.

In preparation for the application to the city, two studies have been carried out, she said. The city has the results of a traffic impact study which Yungwirth said indicate that the addition of more retail space at Preston Crossing will require improved access points to the development. A retail impact study has also been completed and will be submitted to the city as part of the rezoning process.

The timeline for development of phase four has yet to be finalized although Yungwirth said the current target date for the opening of the major tenant is the spring of 2012.

Looking back at the first three phases of Preston Crossing, Yungwirth said the development has been very successful in generating scholarship funds for the university. From 2005 to the end of the current fiscal year, Preston Crossing will have generated $5.75 million in graduate and undergraduate scholarships. Phase three, which includes the new Rona store, is nearing completion and is expected to generate as much as $425,000 annually starting in 2012 while phase four could add as much as $440,000 to the university’s cash flow as early as 2013.

“Preston Crossing has turned out to be as profitable as we expected,” she said. “We had a realistic scenario to start and the results so far are living up to that. The land is still ours, it’s unencumbered and we are providing valuable scholarship funds. It’s a good news story.”

Plans have yet to take shape for the final parcels of land at Preston Crossing – 2.5 acres east of the Sobey’s store and 7.5 acres west of Old Navy.

Source
     
     
  #8599  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2010, 6:02 PM
EarlyByrdProductions's Avatar
EarlyByrdProductions EarlyByrdProductions is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The S'toon & Marsella, Nicaragua
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
Having been to many markets along the Pacific Coast I would have to say our Farmers Market has a pretty good start on that already and it's in close enough proximity to the river to give you the same experience.

To increase space the Traffic Bridge could be used for booths and trailers. Just close it to traffic every weekend throughout the summer.
Hahah how amazing would it be to have merchant shops on a bridge over the river like the Ponte Vecchio in Florence!

~~~

As for the AGS,
I kind of had my fingers crossed that something crazy (but not quite AGA) would go up. But I think they're safe vision will fit the mass conservative appeal for alot of our citizens.
...of course didn't it say that the public gets opinion on it? Can't wait to see the design.
__________________
www.viyarte.com
     
     
  #8600  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2010, 9:55 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Country View Post
Renderings of the Wolf Willow Cohousing project planned for a vacant block in King George. Looks like a nice project and great for the neighbourhood.
Sounds like a cool group of people. They even rented a boom lift to get an idea of what their view would be like.

Wolf Willow Cohousing


Image Source
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:23 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.