HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3361  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 6:28 PM
punface punface is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
Was the guy that poorly behaved named Mel? (i forgot his last name) He tried to run for MLA against Gordon Campbell as part of the NDP in the last election and he was quite adamant about being against SkyTrain and pro-LRT.
That's the guy, yes. His behavior was bad when he interrupted Translink's presentation to our discussion group, but to be fair to him, there were a number of other people who behaved worse, especially at the start of the meeting.

Google tells me his full name is Mel Lehan ("The Mayor of Kitsilano"). He has been quoted in a lot of the free local papers on this issue. Mental Note: Google before you vote.

He was also organizing a meeting at the same location at the end of the month to push for streetcars. I don't think we have to worry about him having any success with the local residents, unless his true goal is to block anything getting built at all.
     
     
  #3362  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 8:01 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by punface View Post
That's the guy, yes. His behavior was bad when he interrupted Translink's presentation to our discussion group, but to be fair to him, there were a number of other people who behaved worse, especially at the start of the meeting.

Google tells me his full name is Mel Lehan ("The Mayor of Kitsilano"). He has been quoted in a lot of the free local papers on this issue. Mental Note: Google before you vote.

He was also organizing a meeting at the same location at the end of the month to push for streetcars. I don't think we have to worry about him having any success with the local residents, unless his true goal is to block anything getting built at all.
Have we discovered Zwei's real-world off-line identity?
     
     
  #3363  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 8:47 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
Have we discovered Zwei's real-world off-line identity?
Check the guys on street corners with sandwich boards ranting about whatever.
     
     
  #3364  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 8:57 PM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by awvan View Post
In some respects I'm glad so many of the locals are against streetcar/LRT. It really is a poor idea for the line that would create such a mess of the roads out there with very little time-savings/benefit. If I can't have Skytrain to UBC, I'd rather have Skytrain to Arbutus with the B-Line continuing from there, hopefully with the eventual completion to UBC at a later date. Streetcar/LRT is a half measure and shouldn't be implemented in any fashion on this route, especially as a temporary fix.

In other news, I heard some crazy nimbies on CKNW this morning saying that the line should go down King Ed or 41st instead, not Broadway. I don't understand how people are so clueless.
Hey sytrain down 41st. Now that would be a dream for me

Maybe that is what I need to do convince them that skytrain half a block from my house is needed.

I'm only joking but it sure would be nice
     
     
  #3365  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 9:35 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
I can only hope the big picture prevails, small-minded and short-sighted thinking has no place in this day and age. Dream big, Vancouver.
     
     
  #3366  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 9:45 PM
CLC CLC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 877
Thanks SSP member(s) for the workshop report.

It would be fun if indeed a sizable portion of Point Grey residents hold opposing view against those merchants (http://www.wbba.ca/) with regards to surface "trams" option. i don't blame those residents for being small-minded as they almost never find the need to use the skytrain system in its current routes; and they are certainly not stupid (unlike Zwei), they see in their own eyes how the frequent 99-b has already clogged up the road space, and the permanent trams will certainly make thing worse.

The best option for NIMBY residents is still skytrain but probably to have no stations between Macdonald and UBC (so they don't feel anything!). They can still use the #9 trolley, but with fewer frequency.
     
     
  #3367  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 10:01 PM
CLC CLC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
Have we discovered Zwei's real-world off-line identity?
Maybe someone does. Zwei sounds like he is receiving some "threats"???
http://railforthevalley.wordpress.com/20...-2-questions-answers-about-lrt/#comments
     
     
  #3368  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 10:24 PM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Penticton
Posts: 3,729
^ From that linked blog:

Quote:
Q: Is a subway safer than LRT?
A: No, subways tend to have a higher death rate than light rail, the SkyTrain metro system’s annual death rate is about 2 to 3 times higher than Calgary’s C-Train.
What a ridiculous contention. Sky train has about 2-3 times the stations, and greater Van has about 2-3 times the population as Calgary/C-Train. Guess the death rate is about the same then....

I'd be interested to know how many of these deaths were caused by accidents, and how many by people throwing themselves on the track.

Pure common sense would dictate an underground or elevated line would have less collisions/accidents than a surface line that regularily interfaces with traffic and pedestrians.
     
     
  #3369  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 10:26 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,731
His "Q&A" posts are ridiculous jokes.
     
     
  #3370  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 10:33 PM
teriyaki teriyaki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
His "Q&A" posts are ridiculous jokes.
+1. I just read some of the stuff on that ludicrous website.

LRT operating at speeds of 110km/h? Is he serious?
     
     
  #3371  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 10:47 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulliver View Post
^ From that linked blog:



What a ridiculous contention. Sky train has about 2-3 times the stations, and greater Van has about 2-3 times the population as Calgary/C-Train. Guess the death rate is about the same then....

I'd be interested to know how many of these deaths were caused by accidents, and how many by people throwing themselves on the track.

Pure common sense would dictate an underground or elevated line would have less collisions/accidents than a surface line that regularily interfaces with traffic and pedestrians.
As of the end of 2008, there were 54 deaths on SkyTrain platform tracks. 10 of those were accidental and the rest were suicides, unpreventable deaths.

But do a simple Google search for "C-Train accident" or "C-Train death" and you get countless results.



Possible ways for an accident to occur on SkyTrain:
1) platform suicides, collision with passenger on platform track
2) platform accidents, fall onto tracks -> collision with passenger on track

Possible ways for an accident to occur on C-Train/LRT:
1) platform suicides, collision with passenger on platform track
2) platform accidents, fall onto tracks -> collision with passenger on track
3) track suicides, collision with pedestrian on track
4) train collision with pedestrian/cyclists on track
5) train collision with car on track
6) train-on-train collision




Surely, there have been more than 10 accidental deaths on the C-Train. And with his logic, I wouldn't be surprised if he blamed platform/train deaths from heart attacks and strokes on SkyTrain.



And according to zwei, Seattle has a "metro lobby".

Last edited by mr.x; May 7, 2010 at 11:14 PM.
     
     
  #3372  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 10:47 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
Imagine LRT doing 110km/h down Broadway between Cambie and Granville. Even if the lights were timed, that — would be hilarious! (and so so dangerous).
     
     
  #3373  
Old Posted May 7, 2010, 11:03 PM
CLC CLC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post

Possible ways for an accident to occur on C-Train/LRT:
1) platform suicides, collision with passenger on platform track
2) platform accidents, fall onto tracks -> collision with passenger on track
3) track suicides, collision with pedestrian on track
4) train collision with pedestrian/cyclists on track
5) train collision with car on track
Mr.x, you forgot the following type of collision common in frequent LRT system:
San Francisco
Hong Kong
     
     
  #3374  
Old Posted May 8, 2010, 12:00 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLC View Post
Mr.x, you forgot the following type of collision common in frequent LRT system:
San Francisco
Hong Kong
Would it hurt to have some description of the context of these photos?
or links to their news articles?
are these train v. train?
train v. tank?
train v. truck?
train v. elephant?


Having just a picture of an accident is almost as bad as Zwei spouting numbers without a link to their source and context.
     
     
  #3375  
Old Posted May 8, 2010, 12:07 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by awvan View Post
Imagine LRT doing 110km/h down Broadway between Cambie and Granville. Even if the lights were timed, that — would be hilarious! (and so so dangerous).
Last time I read about anything doing 110K on Broadway was when a driver in a 3 am car race down Broadway T-boned another car driving south on Granville. I think both drivers died, and one of the wrecks ended up in the construction pit of the new School Board site (where Chapters is now). I don't think they ever found the other driver that was in the race.
     
     
  #3376  
Old Posted May 8, 2010, 12:13 AM
CLC CLC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 877
^ apologize for the lazyness...
Photo1 San Francisco: a Muni light rail "rear-ended" another at West Portal Station, 47 sent to hospitals, 2009/07/18
Photo2 Hong Kong: a MTR light rail "rear-ended" another at Nai Wai Stop, 12 sent to hospitals, 2009/05/06
     
     
  #3377  
Old Posted May 8, 2010, 12:30 AM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,578
Skytrain is one of the only agencies where people focus on the death toll. I think it's just because people are trying to keep score, seeing how many people are killed by computers. It's just a FUD tactic. Other agencies, like C-Train, it's almost impossible to find accident or death rates because people just shrug it all off as human error, what can you do eh? But here it's the computers fault. "If only there was a person at the controls, this wouldn't happen." It's just unfounded fear of automation. And as you see people always cite the running total of deaths, not just the annual rate, as running count of victims claimed by the computer.

Montreal had a rash of suicides on their metro, until they ran a major public awareness campaign pointing out the fact (real or not) that only 1 in 3 die right away. The rest get dragged or thrown, and die minutes or hours later at the scene or in hospital, usually in excruciating pain, and many more actually survive with life altering disabilities.

A lot of people took notice and suicide rates dropped. 2/3 odds of a super painful painful death or recovery are a bit of a turn off for someone looking for a quick way out.

If here they announced and ran stories and advertised that people survive the moment of impact, I bet you would see a lot less people jumping on the tracks.
     
     
  #3378  
Old Posted May 8, 2010, 12:41 AM
huenthar huenthar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
His "Q&A" posts are ridiculous jokes.

Yeah, according to his thinking, LRTs have the advantage over any other system in speed, safety, capacity, cost, reliability, flexibility, accessibility, aesthetics... the fanatic is incapable of conceding that there is even one single possible advantage of underground metro over LRT a wonder that any metro in the world exists, given its apparently panoptic disadvantages
     
     
  #3379  
Old Posted May 8, 2010, 1:37 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
The Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries reported 207 deaths in the ten years 1992-2001 related to elevators and escalators, an average of nearly 21 per year, or almost 2 people every month.

Of these, 61 of those killed were elevator passengers entering or riding in elevators while at work, and there were also 5 deaths due to escalators during this period.

With such a shocking and appalling death toll by these automated machines, its time we brought back the Elevator Girl so there would be a person operating these death traps instead of soul-less computers. By having a person in control of these machines, there would be an immediate reduction of the deaths and injuries caused by these machines to nearly zero.

/ZweiSimulationMode Off
     
     
  #3380  
Old Posted May 8, 2010, 1:50 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Thumbs down The Tyee - SkyTrain's Mounting Death Toll

A google search found this:

SkyTrain's Mounting Death Toll
http://thetyee.ca/News/2008/11/18/SkyTrain/

"According to British Columbia Coroners Service statistics obtained by 24 Hours Vancouver via freedom of information, at least 54 people have died on SkyTrain tracks and platforms. Ten deaths were accidental. The rest were suicides."

The side-story is a little more detailed and graphic, but I'd trust the BC Coroners Service statistics instead of Zwei's "plucked from the air" unattributed numbers.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:23 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.