HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7961  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 12:00 AM
Echoes's Avatar
Echoes Echoes is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 4,518
From Planet S, regarding the Lake Placid deal...

The article is pretty standard information that everyone on here is pretty familiar with, but let me turn your attention to the bolded final paragraph. I was of the understanding already that the Marriott brand was a step below the "luxury" hotel tenant that had been hoped for, but I wasn't aware that this involved a complete scaling back of the hotel and its services (i.e.- conference space, restuarant. Can anyone provide more info on this?

By the way the article makes it sound, Lake Placid is scaling back this project to something lackluster, and not much fuss has been made about it. Is this just a Planet S spin?

Back To The Future

COUNCIL TURNS ONCE AGAIN TO LAKE PLACID AS RIVER LANDING ANCHOR
by Charles Hamilton

Lake Placid is back in the captain’s chair as far as River Landing’s Parcel Y is concerned.

In a 10-1 vote on April 12, Council decided to re-open negotiations with Lake Placid, the development company that says it can start work on a $250 million hotel, condo and office complex on the city’s downtown riverfront any day now.

What’s more, it looks almost certain that Council will be selling the "most valuable real estate in the country" to Lake Placid for roughly half the appraised price.

Council didn’t agree to finalize the price of land in terms of a sale to Lake Placid, but five of the 11 Councillors did support a motion that would sell the land to the developer for no less than $4.8 million (the price Lake Placid was originally supposed to have paid for it), which seems to indicate that that will be the final tally. This is in spite of two separate appraisals, released earlier that week, that put the price of the land at upwards of $11 million.

Still, Lake Placid CEO Michael Lobsinger argues that, even if they get the land at the original rate, his company isn’t getting a deal. He told reporters after the meeting that when he found out that the original purchase price back in 2005 was $1.6 million (in a deal between Remai Investments and the City, which later fell through), he was taken aback when his company was asked to pay more than double that.

“I thought I was getting badly treated when I had to pay $4.8 million,” said Lobsinger. “So am I getting a deal?”

With all the delay, confusion and controversy surrounding the site, citizens of Saskatoon may be asking the same thing.

This will be Lobsinger’s fourth opportunity to get the River Landing project off the ground. In 2009, he failed on three separate occasions to acquire the necessary funding to complete the project, often cited as the most important development in Saskatoon’s history.

This time around, however, he has a highly respected local partner in Karim Nasser — a local developer and philanthropist who recently donated $12 million to the U of S. Another advantage, perhaps, is that the majority of council members seem to be feeling a real sense of urgency in pushing the project forward.

“Just get ‘er done,” said Councillor Maurice Neault, who made the original motion. “At $4.8 million, the City of Saskatoon gets back all its investment, plus comes away with a profit, plus gets a $250 million project.”

When asked about the land price, Mayor Don Atchison told Council he would rather not discuss the matters in public.

“We don’t want Mr. Lobsinger and Mr. Nasser to know what we’re thinking,” he said, later adding that “we want to get value to our citizens, but there’s a question of fairness as well.”

Technically, the price is still up for debate — and to be fair, there’s serious opposition to selling it for less than the appraised value from some council members — but with five councillors on board already, it’s very unlikely that the City will sell the land for anything more than the original $4.8 million.

Sorry, Mayor Atchison — it seems fairly obvious that Mr. Lobsinger and Dr. Nasser know exactly what council is thinking.

Still, if the City does sell the land for less than market value, they’ll be obligated by law to hold public notice — although that may not exactly mean much.

“It has to come forward and people have the right to their say — [although] maybe not their way,” said Neault. “[The final decision] is still done through the vote of council.”

In order to move ahead, the City also says it needs to see a clear financial picture from Lobsinger and his new partner — and until they get that picture there are still a lot of questions.

Neither Lobsinger nor Nasser answered any reporter’s questions about the exact nature of their partnership, though Lobsinger did say that under the new arrangement he’s “absolutely” confident his proposal will pass the financial test.

But why exactly Lobsinger had so much trouble getting his money in order last time around is still a question he refuses to answer. On separate occasions, he’s alluded to Canadian, American and European business regulations preventing him from getting hold of the proper financing. And last November, Lobsinger had famously said he was “one signature away” from closing the deal — but it now appears that, thanks to the partnership with Dr. Nasser, he’s prepared to move ahead without that signature.

“Dr. Nasser and I are proceeding down another vein,” he said. “The financing to proceed with this project is in place.”

Where the new money is coming from is anybody’s guess — and whether or not Lobsinger and Dr. Nasser would pay the appraised price of $11 million for the land if the City demanded it is also unclear.

“We are going to negotiate with the administration, not the press,” Lobsinger said.

(This clearly is true — at one point after the council meeting, Lobsinger lashed out verbally at one reporter who asked about his credibility as developer, given the long list of delays and problems with the River Landing project.)

In the meantime, the City will decide sometime in May whether or not to sell the land to Lake Placid and for what price.

If Council’s decision works out in Lake Placid’s favour — and if all their money comes through — it seems that Saskatoon will get a smaller-scale Mariott hotel, with 150 to 200 rooms and some meeting room space. The “select service” hotel will not have a conference space or a restaurant, but there will also be a large parking garage, some retail space and condos on the highly-prized riverfront site.

Source
__________________
SASKATOON PHOTO TOURS
2013: [Part I] [Part II] | [2014] | [2016] | [2022-25]
     
     
  #7962  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 1:09 AM
brithgob brithgob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 833
For reference, here's a list of their brands (I think it's safe to say you're not getting a Ritz Carlton)

Marriott Hotels & Resorts
JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts
Renaissance Hotels
EDITION Hotels
Autograph Collection
Courtyard by Marriott
Residence Inn by Marriott
Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott
Marriott Conference Centers
TownePlace Suites by Marriott
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
Marriott Vacation Club
The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.
The Ritz-Carlton Destination Club
Marriott ExecuStay
Marriott Executive Apartments
     
     
  #7963  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 2:40 AM
drumuser drumuser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightrambler View Post
I was suprised to see this in the denver airport... and they were all over the place.


wow.i just went to the website posted on that banner. click on this link- http://www.sasktourism.com/places-to-go

tell me where in the hell does this city in saskatchewan exist? if they are saying thats saskatoon, then these folks at tourism saskatchewan have some major explaining to do. major false advertising. way to go saskatchewan..... i am seriously going to email those idiots.
     
     
  #7964  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 4:20 AM
Ruckus's Avatar
Ruckus Ruckus is offline
working stiff
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Woodlawn Cemetery
Posts: 2,583
It's a Courtyard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brithgob View Post
For reference, here's a list of their brands (I think it's safe to say you're not getting a Ritz Carlton)

Marriott Hotels & Resorts
JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts
Renaissance Hotels
EDITION Hotels
Autograph Collection
Courtyard by Marriott
Residence Inn by Marriott
Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott
Marriott Conference Centers
TownePlace Suites by Marriott
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
Marriott Vacation Club
The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.
The Ritz-Carlton Destination Club
Marriott ExecuStay
Marriott Executive Apartments
__________________

And post Sask. Tourism's response on here as soon as you receive it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drumuser View Post
wow.i just went to the website posted on that banner. click on this link- http://www.sasktourism.com/places-to-go

tell me where in the hell does this city in saskatchewan exist? if they are saying thats saskatoon, then these folks at tourism saskatchewan have some major explaining to do. major false advertising. way to go saskatchewan..... i am seriously going to email those idiots.
     
     
  #7965  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 4:20 AM
kgc087's Avatar
kgc087 kgc087 is offline
Urban Dreamer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,128
Saskatoon Ranks 17th PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 29 April 2010
Image

Saskatoon has ranked 17th in a list of most livable communities.

The list was compiled by MoneySense magazine.

It used weather, income, home prices and lifestyle factors to rank one hundred and 54 cities across Canada.

Number one was Ottawa-Gatineau and in the number two spot was Victoria.

In fact there were 8 Ontario cities in the list above us, Winnipeg ranked in the number 7 spot and Vancouver was 10th.

Regina ranked 23rd and Swift Current was 22nd.

Edmonton was in the 29th position and Calgary ranked 35th.

http://www.saskatoonhomepage.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=24930&Itemid=421
______________________________________
This is actually really good for Saskatoon, I think it's another positive boost for the city and will show that Calgary and Vancouver are not the be all and end all in the west.
__________________
Just be.
     
     
  #7966  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 4:39 AM
shmakim shmakim is offline
Burb Dweller
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumuser View Post
tell me where in the hell does this city in saskatchewan exist? if they are saying thats saskatoon, then these folks at tourism saskatchewan have some major explaining to do. major false advertising. way to go saskatchewan..... i am seriously going to email those idiots.
Maybe that's a ... uh, "horizontally compressed" panorama? Or maybe the towers were photoshopped to be taller-looking? Should be a still life candidate for photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com
     
     
  #7967  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 5:06 AM
mike474's Avatar
mike474 mike474 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 600
I always hated that photo. It's tacky. I understand that photographing the whole of the skyline to get the bridges in is a sonofabitch but stretching it to such warped proportions defeats the purpose. I'm not worked up enough to actually complain though.
     
     
  #7968  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 5:09 AM
milanboy milanboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumuser View Post
wow.i just went to the website posted on that banner. click on this link- http://www.sasktourism.com/places-to-go

tell me where in the hell does this city in saskatchewan exist? if they are saying thats saskatoon, then these folks at tourism saskatchewan have some major explaining to do. major false advertising. way to go saskatchewan..... i am seriously going to email those idiots.
Well, it is Saskatoon. Just photographed with some sort of weird fish-eye lense that destords both the vertical and horizontal. Kind of like the funhouse version of Saskatoon!
     
     
  #7969  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 5:53 AM
dsim249's Avatar
dsim249 dsim249 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumuser View Post
wow.i just went to the website posted on that banner. click on this link- http://www.sasktourism.com/places-to-go

tell me where in the hell does this city in saskatchewan exist? if they are saying thats saskatoon, then these folks at tourism saskatchewan have some major explaining to do. major false advertising. way to go saskatchewan..... i am seriously going to email those idiots.

That picture is at the very least 5 years old, and has received a quite a bit of publicity I'd say. I'm just surprised you're sounding like it's the first time you've seen it.

It doesn't seem like its that outrageous to me. And if you come to a small Canadian prairie city of 250,000, thinking you'll find NYC based off that photo, then you're the idiot.
     
     
  #7970  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 1:47 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumuser View Post
wow.i just went to the website posted on that banner. click on this link- http://www.sasktourism.com/places-to-go

tell me where in the hell does this city in saskatchewan exist? if they are saying thats saskatoon, then these folks at tourism saskatchewan have some major explaining to do. major false advertising. way to go saskatchewan..... i am seriously going to email those idiots.
When an artist uses some creative license I'm not sure you can call it false advertising. It is visually altered enough to make a person realize it's not reality. In my opinion it was simply done in a manner to include downtown and its bridges. Personally I don't mind it.

A you can see a few minutes in Photoshop and you can make it normal or change it into Gotham City.




Would love to credit the original photo but not sure of it's source.
     
     
  #7971  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 9:33 PM
shmakim shmakim is offline
Burb Dweller
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 243
GAWD folks we're on the verge of 400 pages!!! Lots to talk about in Stoon!
Sometimes doesn't feel like it tho. Drove down 8th St today and saw the big hole a block east of Broadway. What's that place gonna be called again?
     
     
  #7972  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 9:41 PM
mike474's Avatar
mike474 mike474 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 600
Vestal Condos I do believe. Haven't seen anything online about that project.
     
     
  #7973  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 10:54 PM
circle33's Avatar
circle33 circle33 is offline
Has been
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 4,936
Thevestel.ca outta do it.
__________________
signature
     
     
  #7974  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 12:00 AM
socialisthorde socialisthorde is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 590


meh. Could be worse I suppose.
     
     
  #7975  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 12:57 AM
EarlyByrdProductions's Avatar
EarlyByrdProductions EarlyByrdProductions is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The S'toon & Marsella, Nicaragua
Posts: 283
Saskatoon photo: I think its great. Gives you a full sense of the river and downtown in one picture and makes it look good. It looks great in real life so nothing wrong in m y opinion.

on other topic/ rumour that could bring a new stadium to north downtown and completely change the city.... whos in favour of Saskatoon having our own CFL team?
__________________
www.viyarte.com
     
     
  #7976  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 2:00 AM
JCA JCA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 33
Thats a pretty big rumor to be tossing around haha, is there any thread of truth to it? IMO, you would have to take the railroad right out of that area for a stadium to fit, plus there's the police station to think about, will that get in the way? Call me a negative nancy, but the likely hood of this panning out is next to nil.

Heres for the chance of it happening though, Cheers!
     
     
  #7977  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 2:36 AM
kiwi4life kiwi4life is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: saskatoon
Posts: 536
Ha that is a big rumor, huh im all for it tho, but could saskatoon do it? could saskatoon really support one, and wat would this mean for us?? on the other hand, thats almost like saying can we hold an NHL team??
     
     
  #7978  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 2:39 AM
skyhigh953 skyhigh953 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 44
CFL/Aiport Expansion Plans

I totally agree with Saskatoon having its own CFL team! As long as Regina and Saskatoon don't have games on the same night, I think there are enough fans to make it work! A friendly rivalry between Saskatoon and Regina teams would build a fan base here pretty quickly.

The Airport Authority's Annual Report has floorplans of the new expansion (pages 5-7):
http://www.yxe.ca/about/documents/2009AnnualReport.pdf

I really like the curved pier design. Looks like the departure area will be completely changed/reversed, and looks like they're adding an airport lounge (Maple Leaf Lounge?), another baggage carousel, more restaurants, retail, and a sports bar. Looks like Gates 6-8 would be international (judging by the walls at these gates that lead to Customs), and bridge 7 would be for large planes/potential Europe flight (judging by by the large footprint of the plane parking space). If you zoom into the proposed de-icing area, one of the planes has "B767-300" marked on it. Very exciting! Can't wait to see outside renderings.

Sorry, I tried but couldn't figure out how to put the floorplan pictures directly into the post.

Also, doesn't Saskatoon have one-stop service to Montreal? I thought the daily Ottawa flight with AC Jazz continues on to MTL. If our passenger numbers keep rising the way they have been, I'm sure direct Montreal flights aren't far off.
     
     
  #7979  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 3:31 AM
EarlyByrdProductions's Avatar
EarlyByrdProductions EarlyByrdProductions is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The S'toon & Marsella, Nicaragua
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi4life View Post
Ha that is a big rumor, huh im all for it tho, but could saskatoon do it? could saskatoon really support one, and wat would this mean for us?? on the other hand, thats almost like saying can we hold an NHL team??
Big rumour indeed. However, it appears to be more of a likelihood than many would assume. Halifax and maybe Ottawa again too.
It would definitely split the province and rider nation in half.
Let the debating begin!
__________________
www.viyarte.com
     
     
  #7980  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 4:59 AM
kgc087's Avatar
kgc087 kgc087 is offline
Urban Dreamer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 1,128
I'm going to mail the airport authroity and tell them to remove all the silk plants b/c they are tacky and remove from the beautiful architecture which makes an airport...plus if they are grey with dust they lose their effect.
__________________
Just be.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:46 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.