Quote:
Originally Posted by Temperance
I don't see it happening. From the article it sounds like saskatoon is doing it on the cheap again. This is the sentence that concerns me: "Design competitions tend to run up budgets because they favour risky architecture," Lundholm said. What is wrong with risky architecture? It's like the South Bridge - if we seek out mediocracy that is what we will get.
|
I don't get it either. The design process should be competitive and transparent. I disliked how the project was conceived too. Now we have another black box process where big decisions, involving public money, with long lasting effects is decided by a select few behind closed doors. This project has a 50/50 chance of being
okay.
Cheer up though, the Clarion project should ease the pain. The University tends not to cheap out on high profile projects. Well, they better not with the recent tuition increase.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsim249
Re: the soon-to-be-vacant Confed Canadian Tire. What do you guys think would be a good replacement? 
|
I'd like to see a mixed use retrofit. Won't happen though.
London Drugs? I'm really baffled as to why CTire would relocate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temperance
An article on a proposal to divert waste-water from the power plant so that the river could freeze and skating (and skiing) on the river would once again be possible:
http://www.thestarphoenix.com/technology/Skating+South+Saskatchewan/2946274/story.html
I kind of like the idea. I used to live in Ottawa and the canal there was pretty neat. It would also be great if there was a swimming pool (or beach) functioning on the river in the summer.
|
I'm split on this idea. It'd be great to skate the length of it and have hockey games at River Landing. As well, I could board down the river bank, hit a couple jumps and land on the river without worrying about falling through. However, as Susan Lamb stated in the article, the steam given off is a nice sight during the cold winter months. Psychologically, the steam and the ability to see a flowing river gives me a feeling that it's not that cold outside. I also enjoy seeing the wildlife (mostly birds and a beaver or two). I'm curious about what the cost would be to divert the water.
As far as winter activities go, I'm more interested in developing Diefenbaker Hill and eventually the landfill to accommodate tubing and snowboarding/skiing. Dief could use more height and a magic carpet or tbar. More people would come out and stay longer if they didn't have to hike up after reaching the bottom.
_________________
The zip-line idea is getting some traction. Maybe the City will install one for the summer months
Quote:
A few simple solutions
By Ken Kimpton, The StarPhoenix April 24, 2010
I would add a zip-line to my list of simple luxuries us Toon Town folk could appreciate, as well as pedestrian crossing signs on 22nd Street that motorists actually can see, yield/stop signs at residential four-ways, and sinkhole warnings to and from Stonegate Wal-Mart.
Ken Kimpton
Saskatoon
© Copyright (c) The Star Phoenix
|
Source