HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7401  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2010, 3:17 AM
kiwi4life kiwi4life is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: saskatoon
Posts: 536
Ive only been on overpass bridges with graham, and we barely used a crane, but im not too sure with one going across water, i guess depends on height, but you know, im not fully sure if Graham even has the full job , i just overheard now that their part of the contract is to be signed on the 28th of march, at least thats wat the old man said, so i guess we will see, pretty sure they do have it though.
     
     
  #7402  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2010, 6:59 AM
gowest gowest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 368
Crane

They have been working on this project for several months now and it is opposite the QE power plant. I believe the bridge is going on the north side of the train bridge. This might be something to do with the QE.
     
     
  #7403  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2010, 12:57 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 798
River Intake and Pump Station

Quote:
Originally Posted by gowest View Post
They have been working on this project for several months now and it is opposite the QE power plant. I believe the bridge is going on the north side of the train bridge. This might be something to do with the QE.
You may have missed some of the earlier posts so I will post the full content.



River Intake and Pump Station
Frequently Asked Questions


1. Why is the City of Saskatoon constructing a new river intake and pump station?
The City is constructing a new intake and pump station to provide a long-term, secure river water supply for both the current Water Treatment Plant on Avenue H, and a future Water Treatment Plant.
The City's existing intake and pump station operation, currently leased from Sask Power, is approaching its maximum capacity, and a new facility is required to meet the Saskatoon's growing water demands.

2. Where will the new river intake and pump station be located?
The new intake and pump station will be located upstream of the Water Treatment Plant on the South Saskatchewan River just south of city limits. The structure will be built at the tip of an existing structure on the east side of the river directly across from the Queen Elizabeth (Q.E.) Power Station.



Map is not part of the source info just my addition.


Photo by Ruckus (with a little color correction by me) is not part of the source info.

3. What is a river intake and how does it work?
In this case, a concrete wedge shaped structure with protruding in-river fish screens will be set in the South Saskatchewan River, which will allow river water to flow into it. A pump station then propels the water from the intake site through a series of underground pipes to the Water Treatment Plant on Avenue H. This water is carefully treated and eventually becomes drinking water.

4. Why was this site chosen?
Several sites for the new intake and pump station were considered. The location across from the Q.E. Power Station was chosen as it offers good mid river flow conditions for an intake.

5. Will the new river intake affect my drinking water quality?
No. The proposed location is upstream of all City storm water outfalls to maximize safety.

6. What environmental approvals have been required with respect to the project?
Due to the sensitivity of the intake’s "in-river" location, the project has undergone detailed review by Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment Canada, Transport Canada (Navigable Waters Protection Branch), Saskatchewan Environment, Saskatchewan Watershed Authority, Meewasin Valley Authority, R.M. of Corman Park, Sask. Agriculture and Food, Heritage Resources Branch of the Department of Culture, Youth and Recreation, and Sask Power.
Formal applications have been made to the above agencies through a Project Proposal describing the project construction, potential impacts and mitigation measures in detail.
Construction will only proceed upon receiving all formal approvals from the above agencies.

7. How will the proposed intake affect fish and fish habitat?
The proposed intake will include in-river screens are designed to prevent fish from entering the intake, and will meet the current requirements set forth by Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (D.F.O.).
While the project was designed to minimize the alteration or loss of existing fish habitat, some loss and alteration of fish habitat is expected. To meet D.F.O.'s "No Net Loss" principle, compensation measures are proposed by the City to restrore an area within the river where residual waste from the Water Treatment Plant has accumulated. The removal of waste materials and stabilization of the adjacent river bank will result in improved fish habitat in this area, thus meeting D.F.O. requirements.

8. How much water will the intake withdraw from the South Saskatchewan River?
Under existing water demand conditions, it is estimated that on average the new intake will withdraw less than 1% of the river flow. Most of this water will be returned to the river after it is used by residents and then treated at the Wastewater Treatment Plant located downstream at the north edge of the city.
Water Rights within the province are regulated by Saskatchewan Watershed Authority, and the City currently holds a Water Rights License for withdrawal.

9. Will it be safe to boat or canoe around the intake?
No. Due to the unpredictable nature of the river flow patterns, and its shifting river bottom, signage will be posted to discourage people from getting too close to the facility.
A floating boom will also be installed to deter boats and canoes from floating between the structural columns and front face of the intake. The in-river screens at the intake’s entrance will also prevent accidental access.

10. Will the site be accessible to the public?
The site access road will be gated to prevent public access. Secured access to the intake site will come from the intersection of Cartwright Street and Strathcona Avenue in the R.M. of Corman Park. Closed circuit security cameras will be used to monitor the area near the facility against vandalism.

11. What is the construction schedule for the project?
The construction schedule currently projected is September 2008 – September 2010. This schedule is subject to change based on approvals timing, and tender results.

For more information:
Web Site: Visit the City of Saskatoon web site at www.saskatoon.ca
(search under “w” for Water Treatment)
To submit questions or comments regarding this project:
Email: [email protected]

Source

Last edited by Jerry; Mar 15, 2010 at 4:11 PM. Reason: Added photo by Ruckus
     
     
  #7404  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2010, 4:47 PM
drto drto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kelowna via Calgary via Edmonton via Saskatoon
Posts: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrm857 View Post
saskatoon actually has a very small downtown footprint
I think for a city of 220,000, Saskatoon's downtown footprint is actually quite large ie. as observed from the East bank of the river, it extends quite a distance from South to North. My idea of the downtown proper is from the Sid Buckwold Bridge along the river to the University bridge and then north along Idylwyld to approx 25th and the lands encompassed by these parameters. There is ample land available to build several towers and still not give it a dense, sun-blocking, skyscraper-canyon feel. If you look at Calgary's downtown core, which runs from the Langevin Bridge down to the 10th St. (Louise) Bridge along the Bow River, bordered on the south by 9th Ave, this area is comparable to the area of Saskatoon's downtown however, for a city nearly 5 times larger. To each his own, but one of my complaints about Saskatoon's civic planners in decades past was to begin plannign such a large, dispersed downtown core. Maybe they believed Saskatoon would reach a height of prosperity sooner than it ever has (like 1950). I love Saskatoon's skyline from the East bank (from the north and the south) but from other views, it lacks the same love affair!
     
     
  #7405  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2010, 7:24 PM
Ruckus's Avatar
Ruckus Ruckus is offline
working stiff
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Woodlawn Cemetery
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by drto View Post
I think for a city of 220,000, Saskatoon's downtown footprint is actually quite large ie. as observed from the East bank of the river, it extends quite a distance from South to North. My idea of the downtown proper is from the Sid Buckwold Bridge along the river to the University bridge and then north along Idylwyld to approx 25th and the lands encompassed by these parameters. There is ample land available to build several towers and still not give it a dense, sun-blocking, skyscraper-canyon feel. If you look at Calgary's downtown core, which runs from the Langevin Bridge down to the 10th St. (Louise) Bridge along the Bow River, bordered on the south by 9th Ave, this area is comparable to the area of Saskatoon's downtown however, for a city nearly 5 times larger. To each his own, but one of my complaints about Saskatoon's civic planners in decades past was to begin plannign such a large, dispersed downtown core. Maybe they believed Saskatoon would reach a height of prosperity sooner than it ever has (like 1950). I love Saskatoon's skyline from the East bank (from the north and the south) but from other views, it lacks the same love affair!
That's roughly 463 acres (Calgary) vs 292 acres (Saskatoon).

Big difference. If you stretch Saskatoon's officially defined downtown borders to include some of the adjacent areas you get around 580 acres. Do the same for Calgary (Beltline), and there would still be a substantial difference.

     
     
  #7406  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2010, 7:39 PM
Ruckus's Avatar
Ruckus Ruckus is offline
working stiff
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Woodlawn Cemetery
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
You may have missed some of the earlier posts so I will post the full content.

[...]

2. Where will the new river intake and pump station be located?
The new intake and pump station will be located upstream of the Water Treatment Plant on the South Saskatchewan River just south of city limits. The structure will be built at the tip of an existing structure on the east side of the river directly across from the Queen Elizabeth (Q.E.) Power Station.



Map is not part of the source info just my addition.

[...]
I wonder how old that map image is. Maybe there was an existing peninsula that formed part of a small cove. I wonder if they'll leave that cove filled in.
     
     
  #7407  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2010, 9:52 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruckus View Post
I wonder how old that map image is. Maybe there was an existing peninsula that formed part of a small cove. I wonder if they'll leave that cove filled in.
I believe the peninsula has been there for quite some time. It looks like what they have done over the last year is build it up and expand it to support the infrastructure for the intake and pump station. I have a photo from last fall when I first spotted the fill work. It will be interesting to see how it all comes together.

     
     
  #7408  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 4:55 AM
mike474's Avatar
mike474 mike474 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruckus View Post
That's roughly 463 acres (Calgary) vs 292 acres (Saskatoon).

Big difference. If you stretch Saskatoon's officially defined downtown borders to include some of the adjacent areas you get around 580 acres. Do the same for Calgary (Beltline), and there would still be a substantial difference.
That's actually closer than I would've thought. Calgary's downtown is pretty compact, but I still would've thought it'd be at least twice the area of Stoon's.
     
     
  #7409  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 5:00 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,955
Hey,

The Tallest U/C In Your City thread has been reactivated recently and in hopes of updating the list I am going from city thread to city thread to see if the tallest under construction has changed recently.

I currently have the The Luxe listed as the tallest in Saskatoon. If this is completed or something taller is underway just message me or post it here and I'll add it to the list.



-DJ
     
     
  #7410  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 6:05 AM
dsim249's Avatar
dsim249 dsim249 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 946
^ No. Now we have our ultra-tall-deluxe megascraper, which is currently under construction. Soo... don't forget to add that...







(But actually, they're still finishing up the interior of the Luxe)
     
     
  #7411  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 2:54 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsim249 View Post
^ No. Now we have our ultra-tall-deluxe megascraper, which is currently under construction. Soo... don't forget to add that...







(But actually, they're still finishing up the interior of the Luxe)
Lol thanks for the funny yet informative post ...

Right now Saskatoon is in 36th place (3 ahead of Regina).
     
     
  #7412  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 3:27 PM
Morogolus Morogolus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 289
It's kind of funny that the most exciting urban project we got going on to discuss is a new intake station for the water treatment plant.
     
     
  #7413  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 4:15 PM
circle33's Avatar
circle33 circle33 is offline
Has been
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 4,938
It's as exciting discussing a new Walmart, which dominated these pages not so long ago.
__________________
signature
     
     
  #7414  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 4:24 PM
milanboy milanboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bedford_DJ View Post
I currently have the The Luxe listed as the tallest in Saskatoon. If this is completed or something taller is underway just message me or post it here and I'll add it to the list.
Since The Luxe was shrunk at least twice before being built, isn't there anything under construction that is taller? How about the Academic Health Sciences Wing D? I'm sure it is at least 6 floors which would make it rival The Luxe at 7 stories as tallest, given that the Academic Health Sciences Wing D has an atrium roof that is a floor or two higher. Anyone know the exact heights of the 2 projects?

Last edited by milanboy; Mar 16, 2010 at 5:26 PM.
     
     
  #7415  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 4:37 PM
Ruckus's Avatar
Ruckus Ruckus is offline
working stiff
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Woodlawn Cemetery
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morogolus View Post
It's kind of funny that the most exciting urban project we got going on to discuss is a new intake station for the water treatment plant.
That's debatable. Let's not forget about the sewage lift station next to the Sid Buckwold Bridge.
     
     
  #7416  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 5:27 PM
milanboy milanboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruckus View Post
That's debatable. Let's not forget about the sewage lift station next to the Sid Buckwold Bridge.
Is it taller than The Luxe?
     
     
  #7417  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 5:37 PM
mike474's Avatar
mike474 mike474 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 600
I wondered too if the north health science wing was taller.
     
     
  #7418  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 7:49 PM
midnightrambler's Avatar
midnightrambler midnightrambler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 264
I think I agree with the previous postings regarding the lack of sunlight by tall buildings compacted in a downtown core. It would be better to have a larger area of small scale urban development (4-8 stories), than a small area of really tall buildings. That picture of Ottawa was pretty depressing.

I was in Edmonton recently, and I have found that I really enjoy their downtown. There is plenty of things to do, plenty of very nice buildings, and a mass transit system that works very well (providing you live in the right area). The building height in a lot of areas there is mid-range and when partnered with mass transit it works very well.

I would like to see a study of busiest routes for driving in the city of Saskatoon. and I would like to see Urban development follow that route with the plan for mass transit, plus of course while integrating existing areas.

One thing that people fail to realize, is that once a mass transit system is in place, people tend to build, and live accordingly to the mass transit that would be available to them.

I would say step one in a mass transit system would be the University. They should really plan ahead for a mass transit system, and I don't think that has ever been seriously considered. It should be viewed as an inevitability that Saskatoon should have a light rail network at some point in the future.

But we'll continue to drive cars and complain about the traffic and build houses all the way to Martensville and Warman before we ever consider it. Maybe it should be considered now.

Last edited by midnightrambler; Mar 16, 2010 at 8:05 PM.
     
     
  #7419  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 8:06 PM
Chaps Chaps is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 825
Just curious, does Saskatoon have a "downtown plan" similar to what Regina hired Office for Urbanism to head recently?
     
     
  #7420  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2010, 8:12 PM
drto drto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kelowna via Calgary via Edmonton via Saskatoon
Posts: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaps View Post
Just curious, does Saskatoon have a "downtown plan" similar to what Regina hired Office for Urbanism to head recently?
If by "downtown plan" you mean a suggestion for what someone who knows absolutely nothing would suggest, then I'd be happy to share my vision for downtown Saskatoon. But if you mean an actual, professional "downtown plan", then I have no idea!!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:18 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.