Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightrambler
I pay taxes and vote in elections so I can say whatever I want.
I have often thought of running for public office. But you see the problem is political parties and the bureaucratic culture within them that restricts free thought and open conversation. In the end they all just end up toeing the party line, or at the very least, and rightly so, kicked to the curb like Jim Pankiw.
Politicians get the shaft everywhere. I don't disagree with all they do, but I am dissatisfied as much with the Conservatives and Saskatchewan Party and their tight wad attitude as I was with the Liberals and NDP's and their tax and spend attitude on useless projects.
The Conservatives have a chance to get it right. They need to spend some money. So do the Sask Party. I could care less about a 40% reduction in our province's debt. I don't think it helps us as citizens all that much. And there is a lot of places that have no regard for debt whatsoever. I'd like to see some money spent on useful, landmark, cultural, and symbolic projects. We have a chance to do all that with the bridge in this city right now.
Take the 1930s for example, which was also a difficult economic time. In Arizona/Nevada they built the Hoover Dam. In Saskatoon they built the Bessborough hotel.
How symbolic are those projects now?
There is just no imagination in architecture or design anymore and therefore no pride and no heritage. That is what I believe is what this blog is largely about, and what currently politicians fail to realize.
|
Of course you can say whatever you want, it's your obligation to voice your opinion. And yes, politicians unfairly get the shaft everywhere, so why does it make sense to spew off worthless drivel such as the 'trifecta of incompetence' and the ever-so-old Quebec gets whatever the hell they want? I know it was probably just a joke, but it hasn't been funny for a long time. Fiscal federalism is far too complicated to be reduced to such simplistic notions whenever a project is delayed, downsized or changed in a manner that does not conform to one's expectations.
As for the lack of imagination and thinking big, I can can agree with your sentiments in that regard. Everytime I see the exquisite ornamentation on the oldest university buildings or lament the lack of contemporary development downtown I think why everyone has to be so damn risk-averse. But since the 1930s governments (especially provincial and municipal) have taken upon themselves far more duties and when every piece of grandiose ornamentation can equal hiring more doctors, nurses, MRI machines, filling potholes etc. I would hope that the people on this board can offer something a little more constructive.