HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4401  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2009, 3:10 AM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zassk View Post
I suggest you actually look at the tables in the PDF, because your criticism is misplaced. The actual raw numbers of people riding bikes to/from UBC per weekday decreased from 2,700 in 1997 to 1,600 in 2008. Pedestrians down from 1,400 to 1,000. The mode-share numbers are also in the PDF, but they are not what I quoted. The report attempts to draw a conclusion:
Right, but when you say "bicycle trips to UBC decreased by 41%" it sounds like a lot. Not exactly the same impact as saying "bicycle trips drop from 3% of total trips to 1%" which is also true. And walking going from aprox 1% down to aprox 1% of total trips.

Like someone could steal 100% of my money from my bank account, but really they would only be taking about $20.
     
     
  #4402  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2009, 2:17 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
David
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabotp View Post
This may sound like a dumb question.

But who in their right mind would walk to UBC

Now that would be one long walk.
without reading the report i'm assuming that accounts for people living in res, plus point grey of course
     
     
  #4403  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2009, 4:03 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,106
I saw the Koodo bus today - its hard to miss - it was on cambie - its got one of the light changing signs on it - very bright most people didn't even seem to look at it but those that did really noticed it

also saw a few very good wraps on the Canada line - when did those start? I've seen the little ones but not whole trains covered - they look great
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #4404  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2009, 2:23 PM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
without reading the report i'm assuming that accounts for people living in res, plus point grey of course
Ya after I posted that I kind of figured it must be people living on campus. Point Grey though I would consider to still be too far for most people to walk.
     
     
  #4405  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2009, 5:11 PM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabotp View Post
Point Grey though I would consider to still be too far for most people to walk.
True. I used to take that walk a few times a month when I lived on campus though.
     
     
  #4406  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2009, 6:29 PM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,394
I saw a Van City wrap on a MKII skytrain car..........first time I have seen a MKII decked out.............

have any MKII's been done up b4?
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
     
     
  #4407  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2009, 7:32 PM
NetMapel's Avatar
NetMapel NetMapel is offline
Hello World
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,580
Boy I haven't ridden on the Expo line for quite some time but I rode it to Metrotown yesterday. I guess I have forgotten how dirty it is, even on the new cars. There is litter everywhere on the floor ! What's with the huge difference in "clean-ness" between the Canada Line and Expo Line ? Are there less staff on the Expo line or something ?
     
     
  #4408  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2009, 7:43 PM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetMapel View Post
Boy I haven't ridden on the Expo line for quite some time but I rode it to Metrotown yesterday. I guess I have forgotten how dirty it is, even on the new cars. There is litter everywhere on the floor ! What's with the huge difference in "clean-ness" between the Canada Line and Expo Line ? Are there less staff on the Expo line or something ?
It probably has more to do with the fact that there is way more people on the Expo line over the Canada line.

Also don't forget that the Canada line is still very new it hasn't lost its shine yet. Which makes appear to be cleaner. No matter how dirty it might be.
     
     
  #4409  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2009, 7:53 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
^ actually, no. There is better maintenance and a bit more cleaning on the Canada Line as the payment the private operators get is also based on customer service. You almost never see garbage anywhere on the Canada Line.

There was a memo a few months ago, just before the Canada Line opened, that said SkyTrain would offer better customer service and clean the trains more often...iunno if that has happened.
     
     
  #4410  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2009, 8:38 PM
NetMapel's Avatar
NetMapel NetMapel is offline
Hello World
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,580
Well I rode the new sky train cars that just came here a couple of months ago. I understand the skytrain system is old so I am fine with whatever scratch marks. However, it's strange to see garbages/litters on the floor everywhere...
     
     
  #4411  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2009, 9:23 PM
zivan56 zivan56 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,207
I am surprised that Skytrain cars are *this* clean especially compared to some other metros. You should see what people bring in to eat/drink and end up stinking up the trains or making a mess. IMO paper and other "clean" garbage is not a big issue.
     
     
  #4412  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2009, 5:32 AM
gillty gillty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hyogo, Japan / Vancouver
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetMapel View Post
Boy I haven't ridden on the Expo line for quite some time but I rode it to Metrotown yesterday. I guess I have forgotten how dirty it is, even on the new cars. There is litter everywhere on the floor ! What's with the huge difference in "clean-ness" between the Canada Line and Expo Line ? Are there less staff on the Expo line or something ?
Pro Trans gets paid based on service from Translink so everything has to be taken care of as soon as possible. Protrans also pays a private cleaning contractor, Omni Facility Services to clean everything. Anytime there is a problem there is a immediate meeting between translink and protrans and sometime Omni, if it isn't taken care of quickly heavy penalties are enforced on Protrans.
     
     
  #4413  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2009, 5:37 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
I think SkyTrain should contract their cleaning services out to another company (maybe not OMNI).
     
     
  #4414  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2009, 6:13 AM
ravman ravman is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by deasine View Post
I think SkyTrain should contract their cleaning services out to another company (maybe not OMNI).
The Underhill report

Quote:
“A final reason to consider a PPP would be to capture any advantages there might be in having a private operator….TransLink previously explored the idea of private operations for SkyTrain and found at the time that costs of private operations would exceed TransLink’s own costs.”- the Underhill report
pg 51

btw... its a report

Deasine:
     
     
  #4415  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2009, 6:19 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Contracting out services and developing a P3 operations are two different things. Moreover, I'm only talking about contracting a component of the services out. Cost wise, contracting services might not be cheaper, and yes it can be more expensive, but it all comes down to quality of the service.
     
     
  #4416  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2009, 6:40 AM
ravman ravman is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by deasine View Post
Contracting out services and developing a P3 operations are two different things. Moreover, I'm only talking about contracting a component of the services out. Cost wise, contracting services might not be cheaper, and yes it can be more expensive, but it all comes down to quality of the service.
correct me if i am wrong, but isnt Translink in a bit of a "financial mess" and cannot afford additional costs?
     
     
  #4417  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2009, 6:41 AM
Zassk Zassk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,303
"costs of private operations would exceed TransLink’s own costs"

Well, of course it would - Translink is apparently not doing any cleaning at all. :-)

I have seen some refuse like Starbucks cups stuffed into Canada Line seats, but overall the trains are kept very clean.

Canada Line ridership per-train-car can't be much different from Expo Line ridership per-train-car, so you would expect refuse to accumulate at similar rates on each line. Maybe riders treat the C-line better while the "new car smell" is present, but I bet the cleaning staff is responsible for the difference.
     
     
  #4418  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2009, 6:43 AM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,907
Yea, it's probably more expensive for a reason... ie. People actually cleaning the trains and stations.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
     
     
  #4419  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2009, 6:46 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Well in ravman's defense, the report is talking about P3ing the existing SkyTrain system (and not just the contracting of cleaning services), and why would you do that anyway... The point of a P3 is so that it reduces the risk, and most of the risk occurs during construction. In terms of operations, I think BCRTC is doing a great job, but just lacks in terms of the customer service and cleaning components. Scanning through the report, it lacks details and is based on a generalized P3 system, which doesn't necessarily apply into the Canada Line.

Whether or not TransLink is in a bad financial situation doesn't really matter because this isn't going to be long term. Besides, the cost of contracting services, if it is more, won't be substantial enough to tip TransLink's budget over. Really, if TransLink was desperate with money, most of the SkyTrain stations would already look like the Canada Line downtown ones: walls full of ads.

Last edited by deasine; Nov 16, 2009 at 9:25 AM.
     
     
  #4420  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2009, 7:13 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by deasine View Post
I think SkyTrain should contract their cleaning services out to another company (maybe not OMNI).
I'd love to see that happen, but I'm quite sure the [spoiled] unions won't have any of that.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:42 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.