Quote:
Originally Posted by kgc087
What were all the options?! I didn't even know they had the options out to the public?
|
I wish I knew. Whatever design solution they went with the MVA would need to approve of it, but that does not necessarily mean aesthetics were a priority. We shouldn't expect something on the same level as River Landing (would be nice, but...). What was there before was fine, wasn't good or great though. There were what I would call rail ties stacked up to stabilize the slope, and a paved path following along the rail ties in a switchback pattern. Between the bridge and paved switchback was a set of stairs (I think they were rail ties too).
It is apparent they cleared a huge swath of trees, leaving open the possibility of a steep slope ideally suited for a snowboard/tobaggan hill come winter (add some LED lighting for ultimate

).
I'm thinking it will be similar to what they did beside the Broadway Bridge, sort of like a small pocket park, benches and trees, shrubbery, nothing too dense with rocks scattered about. A pocket park/toboggan hill would be the best choice, but would likely not happen due to the greed of Saskatchewan Crescent residents. Would someone please think of the children!(I actually don't know if this is the case, just a hunch).