Quote:
Originally Posted by ExcaliburKid
I can see it now....
Stantec - "Hi, Stantec here I'd like to build a 60 storey HQ to house my many employees."
NavCan - "Ooo sorry Stantec, thats much to tall and epic for the airport overlay. I'm afraid you will have to downsize."
Stantec - "Downsize?"
NavCan - "Yes."
Stantec - "Bye-bye Edmonton, perhaps Calgary has a parking lot they'd like to replace with a bitchin' HQ..."
City of Edmonton - "Shit"
City of Calgary - "Sweet"
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by onishenko
/\ haha. Yeah probably not. I'm sure they are content with their current set up. Until you have a large number of employees spread out around a number of buildings over a larger geographic area, and in doing so it is detrimental to cohesive productivity, there is no desire or need to consolodate into anything new/larger.
|
onishenko, aren't they already in three buildings (and that's counting the two towers and the addition on 111th as a single building)?
ExcaliberKid, the risk of losing stantec won't likely come from their not being able to build a 60 storey building in edmonton, it will be from their not being able to provide suitable air connections to the world's financial centres for a new york stock exchange listed company. and the odds are probably better that we would lose them to chicago or boston than calgary so all of alberta would lose as a result of the kind of petty regional squabbling we haven't gotten over with ecca and that some would like to continue with hsr.