HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3861  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2009, 3:42 PM
Jasper and one o nin's Avatar
Jasper and one o nin Jasper and one o nin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Лесные Высоты
Posts: 3,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by m0nkyman View Post
Small airplanes running at full capacity from regional airplanes to hubs.
Large airplanes running at full capacity from hub to hub.

vs

Mid size planes never running at full capacity but flying directly.

There is some economic sense to be had given that binary choice.....
That begs the question, why would AC give YEG a direct flight to London if they are going to do everything they can to discourage passengers from using it?
__________________
"Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know." And he says, "Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness." So I got that goin' for me, which is nice. Carl Spackler, 1980
     
     
  #3862  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2009, 11:00 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
Because Edmonton is a major Canadian centre that Air Canada knew they needed to enter the LHR before competition did.

Since they do not have partner that would serve the route they did.
     
     
  #3863  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2009, 2:01 AM
Jasper and one o nin's Avatar
Jasper and one o nin Jasper and one o nin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Лесные Высоты
Posts: 3,345
i understand, it just really seems stupid. they give us a route, and then discourage people to use it.
__________________
"Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know." And he says, "Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness." So I got that goin' for me, which is nice. Carl Spackler, 1980
     
     
  #3864  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2009, 2:35 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
How do you come to the conclusion they don't want people to fly that route? I can assure you they want that route to do well.
     
     
  #3865  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2009, 5:23 AM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by YYCguys View Post
So it seems at least initially, guests in Calgary who want to go to Cancun will be making a connection in Edmonton. That's a welcome switch!

WestJet Comments on Canadian Gov't Designation for Mexico
Airline receives OK to fly to popular resort destinations

CALGARY, June 9 /CNW/ - WestJet (TSX:WJA) today commented on the federal
government's granting of designation for WestJet to provide increased
scheduled service to Mexico.
Sean Durfy, WestJet President and Chief Executive Officer, said these
designations are a continuing expression of the government's confidence in
WestJet to provide Canadians with high-value, low-cost travel.
"This announcement today is another step forward in our strategic plan,
which includes significant international expansion," he said. "Our ability to
deliver our exceptional guest experience to Mazatlan and San Jose del Cabo has
now resulted in further designations from the Transport Minister. We
appreciate the minister's confidence and look forward to providing service to
these new and exciting destinations in Mexico."
Included in this announcement are designations that apply immediately and
some that apply in December 2009. As WestJet's fleet continues to expand, the
airline remains well positioned to serve these destinations on a scheduled
basis.
Specific information regarding dates and fares will be available in the
coming weeks.

WestJet received the following designations effective immediately:
Vancouver-Mazatlan
Calgary-Puerto Vallarta
Edmonton-Cancun
Edmonton-Puerto Vallarta

Winnipeg-Mazatlan
Winnipeg-Puerto Vallarta
Halifax-Cancun

WestJet received the following designations effective December 2009:
Vancouver-Cancun
Vancouver-Puerto Vallarta
Calgary-Cancun
Winnipeg-Cancun
Toronto-Cancun
Toronto-Puerto Vallarta
Montreal-Cancun

Durfy said today's news is exciting for both WestJet and its guests. "Our
network connectivity into major Canadian cities, our comfortable,
Next-Generation 737s, the incredible packages that WestJet Vacations offers
and, of course, our fun and friendly service...they are all reasons why more
and more Canadians are choosing WestJet each and every day."

About WestJet

WestJet is Canada's leading high-value low-cost airline offering
scheduled service throughout its 47-city North American and Caribbean network.
Named Canada's most admired corporate culture in 2005, 2006 and 2007, WestJet
pioneered low-cost flying in Canada. WestJet offers increased legroom and
leather seats on its modern fleet of 75 Boeing Next-Generation 737 aircraft,
and live seatback television provided by Bell ExpressVu. With future
deliveries for an additional 46 aircraft, bringing its fleet to 121 by 2013,
WestJet strives to be the number one choice for travellers.



For further information: WestJet, Gillian Bentley, Media Relations,
1-888-WJ 4 NEWS (1-888-954-6397), Email: [email protected], Website:
www.westjet.com
Index of Releases

Link here http://micro.newswire.ca/release.cgi?rkey=1606093950&view=87295-2&Start=0

Its now been set in stone...
WestJet will begin 3 times weekly nonstop service from Edmonton to Cancun on Dec 8/09.Flights will operate on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Sundays utilizing a mix of 737-700's and a 737-800 on the Thursday flight.The flights will also continue into the spring/summer season of 2010 with those schedules to be announced later in 2009.The carrier had formerly been operating the route for Transat holidays and will now operate in its own right.

Last edited by tuffyy; Jun 19, 2009 at 5:24 AM. Reason: adding
     
     
  #3866  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2009, 7:43 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #3867  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2009, 7:47 PM
ExcaliburKid's Avatar
ExcaliburKid ExcaliburKid is online now
Derp
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,227
That's one alluring rendering.
     
     
  #3868  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2009, 8:25 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
LookittheSHINEY
     
     
  #3869  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2009, 10:50 PM
0773|=\ 0773|=\ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,256
Hot. Now if only there was a direct DT<->YEG rail line running right underneath it...
     
     
  #3870  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2009, 3:56 PM
IKAN104's Avatar
IKAN104 IKAN104 is offline
Big Dog
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
    
__________________
-There's always a better way-
     
     
  #3871  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2009, 3:33 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,085
That control tower looks better than most downtown office buildings.
     
     
  #3872  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2009, 3:03 PM
IKAN104's Avatar
IKAN104 IKAN104 is offline
Big Dog
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,346
Of course it's only a proposal. Who knows what we'll actually end up with.
__________________
-There's always a better way-
     
     
  #3873  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2009, 3:27 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
/\ Not that.
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #3874  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2009, 3:35 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,611
Yeah., I would bet a pretty standard NavCan design out in the field. Why have a needless expense.

It would be the first thing deleted from airport renovations.
     
     
  #3875  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2009, 3:46 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
It would certainly be a neat sight to behold on landing.
     
     
  #3876  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2009, 3:51 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir.Humphrey.Appleby View Post
Yeah., I would bet a pretty standard NavCan design out in the field. Why have a needless expense.

It would be the first thing deleted from airport renovations.
new tower not in field but on terminal
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #3877  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2009, 4:40 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
And remember it's not just a control tower. EA will be moving a lot of their operations into the new tower as well.
__________________
Short term pain for long term gain
     
     
  #3878  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2009, 5:39 PM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
Briareos Hecatonchires
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Big E
Posts: 3,805
How soon could construction of the new tower get started if the study should favour it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by itom 987 View Post
That control tower looks better than most downtown office buildings.
Quite true!
__________________
Edmonton/Amiskwacîwâskahikan Lat. 53° 34'N Elevation 671 m (2201 ft) Pop. 1,010,899 (2021 city) 1,418,118 (2021 metro) - North America's northernmost metro area over one million.
     
     
  #3879  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2009, 6:22 PM
LO 044's Avatar
LO 044 LO 044 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,554
I'm curious which floor would be good for a proper observation deck for ya know, the people actually using the airport. Sadly EA will probably lease all the space to the highest bidder or sit their head honchos in the best viewed offices facing the runways.
     
     
  #3880  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2009, 6:40 PM
IKAN104's Avatar
IKAN104 IKAN104 is offline
Big Dog
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,346
There's gotta be some kind of observation deck in there because what we have right now (though it can hardly even be called an observation deck) will be blocked by the new tower.
__________________
-There's always a better way-
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:28 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.