^you haven't explained a thing. in what way are we "overdue"? in having interesting proposals as opposed to uninteresting ones? or in having proposals at all? and what makes dtla "due" for such things to begin with? the period of absence of such proposals?
so is there a normal timeframe along which were expected to be getting "interesting proposals" which aren't supposed to be built? like are we due for "interesting and ambitious proposals" every 5 years? or are we due for "interesting and ambitious proposals" around 12 year intervals?
don't worry, i get your statement. i'm just being very sarcastic about your comment because it's pretty vapid, like many others you make.
Threaded Mode