HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1381  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2009, 11:59 PM
clooless clooless is offline
Registered Luser
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by ravman View Post
yeah BUT what if i were to place drugs on the plane that is going south...

I would be charged under US laws for importing narcotics amongs the other charges....
No, you would be charged under the applicable Canadian law as you have not left Canada. As I described above, there are signs alerting you to this fact in the customs area at YYZ (Pearson) and likely every other Canadian airport with pre-clearance facilities.
     
     
  #1382  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2009, 10:44 AM
ravman ravman is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by clooless View Post
No, you would be charged under the applicable Canadian law as you have not left Canada. As I described above, there are signs alerting you to this fact in the customs area at YYZ (Pearson) and likely every other Canadian airport with pre-clearance facilities.
as someone who has worked in the airport, trust me. I was told by supervisors to be extra cautious with what i bring/leave behind in the transborder side and that all actions would be enforced by US officials. Basically things are extra strict on that side as they are on the other side... the planes on those sides are technically US space even though the wheels are on Canadian land.

now i mean the planes are US soil and not the actual terminal or aprons (outside area where pple work)
     
     
  #1383  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2009, 3:21 PM
clooless clooless is offline
Registered Luser
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 424
OK. I understand. I recall reading something that the planes themselves are considered to be under U.S. jurisdiction, just not the clearance area in the terminal.
     
     
  #1384  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2009, 11:09 PM
ravman ravman is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by clooless View Post
OK. I understand. I recall reading something that the planes themselves are considered to be under U.S. jurisdiction, just not the clearance area in the terminal.
when a plane moves from domestic terminal to go to the Transborder side, it is "swept clean and bombed check" on the non transborder side and then driven over... for planes arriving from and then departing back to America are cleaned and bomb checked under Canadian authority before jurisdiction is given to the yankees

its kinda complex to explain here
     
     
  #1385  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2009, 12:59 AM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
They actually bomb check every plane?
     
     
  #1386  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2009, 2:50 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,075
of course
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #1387  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2009, 8:43 AM
teriyaki teriyaki is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
They actually bomb check every plane?
I never knew that either. Go homeland security!
     
     
  #1388  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2009, 5:11 PM
ravman ravman is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
They actually bomb check every plane?
edit not every plane...


EVERY SEAT



Yes, all the seats get ripped up and get a good "pat-down"
     
     
  #1389  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2009, 12:02 AM
Hourglass Hourglass is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 754
YVR passenger numbers for January down 9.3% from a year earlier.

Ouch. The capacity cutbacks by the arilines are really starting to show in traffic figures...

YVR January 2009 Traffic Report
     
     
  #1390  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2009, 8:36 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,048
Given the current economic crisis, the stranglehold on air routes by Ottawa in favour of Toronto (with the long-awaited exception of the EU-Canada Open Skies agreement), and the relatively modest size of Vancouver as a
city, it looks as if it's going to be a few years before we really join the airport "Big-League." This seems to be what most people want: an airport that reflects the size, character and status of the city, along with the ease of getting from point A to point B. We have a great terminal with charming landscaping and modern facilities, all of which earn us accolades from folks like Condé Nast Magazine, and Skytrax. As for jets lining up on the runway for takeoff to all four corners of the world ... well ... that may take a while, but it's probably a future reality. Just how many years away is the question.
     
     
  #1391  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2009, 9:54 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,075
its happenning everywhere not just YVR

many airlines are cutting back routes all over the place and passenger traffic is down
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #1392  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2009, 4:37 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,075
the rings at YVR look awesome

they change colours and do a need effect but they weren't doing it by the time I got my camera out its extremely bright and really eye catching and huge

pics by me


__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #1393  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2009, 5:56 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,048
... air rights dogfight .....

There's been a a big push recently by Emirates to land more often at Toronto, and to start service to Vancouver as well. This includes the AIRBUS 380 giant jet. If you're interested, theres an informative article on the (so very typical) Canadian restrictions at:

http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=1395409

Last edited by trofirhen; Mar 18, 2009 at 5:58 PM. Reason: sp
     
     
  #1394  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2009, 7:03 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
That's interesting information, hopefully the Federal Governmnet will allow that to happen.
The construction projects in the Domestic Terminal will be finished by June.

Last edited by Gordon; Mar 18, 2009 at 8:04 PM.
     
     
  #1395  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2009, 7:09 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
are there any renderings of the terminal expansion?
     
     
  #1396  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2009, 8:06 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
I don'y know if there are . Ther may be some pictures on PCL's Website.
     
     
  #1397  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2009, 8:41 PM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
There's been a a big push recently by Emirates to land more often at Toronto, and to start service to Vancouver as well. This includes the AIRBUS 380 giant jet. If you're interested, theres an informative article on the (so very typical) Canadian restrictions at:

http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=1395409

More airports than Just Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver.

Should add atleast Comox, Iqaluit to the list, even though there only use would be emergency landings.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
     
     
  #1398  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2009, 4:36 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
There's been a a big push recently by Emirates to land more often at Toronto, and to start service to Vancouver as well. This includes the AIRBUS 380 giant jet. If you're interested, theres an informative article on the (so very typical) Canadian restrictions at:

http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=1395409
Good for those restrictions. Why let state-controlled Emirates come in and rape our own airlines?
     
     
  #1399  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2009, 4:49 AM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laramidia
Posts: 12,781
More choices means lower prices. Emirates are high quality from what i understand as well.
__________________
Peak SSP:

28C is hotter than 42C
Vancouver is not on the ocean but Quebec City is.
     
     
  #1400  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2009, 3:58 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,048
Question Who said anything about rape?

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Good for those restrictions. Why let state-controlled Emirates come in and rape our own airlines?
Now that Air canada has gobbled up Canadian Air lines (formery CP Air), and WESTJET fills a big gap on intra-Canadian, and holiday charters, Canada is left - or, rather -VANCOUVER - is left with an under-represented overseas presence, be it one of our airlines, or a foreign airline. And whether they're state-controlled or not, does that matter, at this point?
*
In terms of overseas destinations - out of Vancouver - serviced by Air Canada, other than USA destinations like SFO, LAX, DFW and a couple of others, the ONLY overseas destination served from Vancouver in Europe is London Heathrow; not even Frankfurt, nor Amsterdam. Of course, there are several Asian destinations served by Air Canada, and Sydney, too.
*
Does Air Canada fly from Vancouver to Dubai?
NO; Why? Because it chooses not to. Dubai is a major world hub, rather like Singapore or Hong Kong - only richer - and is gaining enormous momentum financially, as a transit point, and as a tourist destination the world over.
*
Here we have Emirates, wanting to serve Vancouver, Air Canada stuffily saying "no!" and you're screaming "rape"? ! ? !
*
Having Emirates servicing Vancouver would enhance the city as a major world destination air-wise, and provide momentum for other as-yet nonexistent routes, like Paris, Rome, New Delhi, among others.
*
It seems to me that in your way of thinking, we should cut out other airlines like BA, KLM, Lufthansa, United, Delta, American, and other foreign carriers; like JAL, Korean Air Lines, Air New Zealand . . . . That way they wouldn't be "raping" Air Canada (or Westjet either) Then we could put in excellent Air Canada to San Francisco, L.A., Chicago, Dallas, Phoenix, Washington D.C., LHR, Denver, Tokyo, Auckland, Seoul, Beijing . . . .
*
YEAH. . RIGHT !!
*
Hey, did you know that GREYHOUND busses is an American firm.
Yeppers. . . . American. And they're the only one offering an across-Canada bus service.
Are they "raping" our cross-Canada bus services? NO. WHY? THERE'S NOTHING TO RAPE. (Otherwise stated, there exists no Canadian-owned, cross Canada bus service).
It's parallel with the air industry. Can you fathom that?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:54 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.