HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3041  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2009, 10:42 PM
oiler-dude's Avatar
oiler-dude oiler-dude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
really like how the curve seems to tailor as it reaches the street level.

nice shots


OILER DUDE - post those skyline ones in the canada - skyline section!
Way ahead of ya, cold, already posted.
     
     
  #3042  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 2:15 AM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
Some skyline shots from today

Sorry for the dirty lens... I was in a bit of a rush & didn't check it



     
     
  #3043  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 2:18 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,010
Nice...

And it looks like they are moving ahead with the second building...unless they are just extending their DP.

Job No 84040474-001: To construct a Professional, Financial, and Office Support Service Building (Huntington Galleria II).
4420 - CALGARY TRAIL NW
Plan 0023212 Blk 30 Lot 10
HUNTINGTON GALLERIA INC.
EMPIRE PARK

Last edited by CMD UW; Feb 5, 2009 at 2:39 AM.
     
     
  #3044  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 3:04 AM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMD UW View Post
Nice...

And it looks like they are moving ahead with the second building...unless they are just extending their DP.

Job No 84040474-001: To construct a Professional, Financial, and Office Support Service Building (Huntington Galleria II).
4420 - CALGARY TRAIL NW
Plan 0023212 Blk 30 Lot 10
HUNTINGTON GALLERIA INC.
EMPIRE PARK
Thats a decent suburban building yo.
     
     
  #3045  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 3:37 AM
Mikemike Mikemike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,230
I'm curious about these 'high capacity' angle parking stalls that Kerry mentions. I always thought that one angle parking stall has the same capacity as an parallel stall or a perpendicular one.

You learn something new every day.
     
     
  #3046  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 5:00 AM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
^ This is what they're up in arms about. I took this in the summer part way through the construction between 82 and 87 streets.

They reduced some parking to allow the sidewalks to be like that.

     
     
  #3047  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 5:09 AM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
^ I had to dig through a lot of pics to find that. Here's some pics of the 'hood



     
     
  #3048  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 5:36 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,151
240 - that 2nd shot really shows the length of our skyline, thanks.
     
     
  #3049  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 6:26 AM
Rem Rem is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Just in case anyone's interested, we'll see the first people moving into century park's phase one this march. The covering over the first building will be removed in the next few weeks.
     
     
  #3050  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 1:44 PM
Shodan's Avatar
Shodan Shodan is offline
Sherwood Park as a Nation
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Where I hang my hat
Posts: 2,372
Wheels come off proposed Argyll velodrome
Judge overturns council approval of river valley location


Gordon Kent
The Edmonton Journal

Thursday, February 05, 2009

The Argyll Community League has won a court case aimed at stopping construction of a $32-million indoor velodrome and fitness complex beside the Mill Creek Ravine.

In a rare legal defeat for the city, Court of Queen's Bench Justice D.L. Shelley overturned council's decision to approve the project last April because proper procedures weren't followed.

An Edmonton bylaw only allows major public facilities to be built along the river valley if council concludes the site is essential. In the case of the velodrome, that was never clearly stated and the necessary environmental assessment and location studies weren't done, Shelley ruled.

Mike Leedham, past president of the community league, said Wednesday they hope the city will now take a second look at the scheme, which would feature North America's second internationally sanctioned 250-metre cycling track.

"We don't think it makes sense to put what is proposed to be a major recreation facility at the back of a residential neighbourhood with access via residential streets only and no transit," Leedham, said. The league spent about $25,000 on legal fees fighting the case.

"If this was a new neighbourhood, there's no way they would consider that."

The site, now home to the outdoor velodrome erected for the 1978 Commonwealth Games, would become a covered, multi-sport centre with a running track, two-storey fitness centre, infield space for sports such as rugby or indoor soccer, and basketball and badminton courts.

The Argyll Velodrome Association, which put the plan together, wants the city to contribute $8 million toward construction costs, but expects to pay all operating expenses with help from user fees.

Leedham said the process of selecting the site was skewed in favour of Argyll. They want other places considered or the size of the facility scaled back to reduce traffic and parking concerns.

"If it was just a covered velodrome and was going to carry on essentially as is ... 12 months a year, I'm not sure our community would be as opposed to it as we are, but the economics of the situation are such that they need the revenue."

Association spokesman Mike Burton said the judge's decision could delay their fundraising. They're meeting with city officials Friday to find out what it means.

"We're pretty optimistic as a group that the project is still a good (one). Whether it's that site or a different site, we're still anxious to move forward."

The legal hitch hasn't reduced the interest of the volunteer organization, he said.

"I think it's going to take more than this to kill the enthusiasm of this group."

While Coun. Bryan Anderson called the ruling a problem, he supports the project, saying plans to run school and youth programs at the velodrome might take cycling beyond being a local "niche" sport.

"Do I still think it's of value? Absolutely. Does it have to go there to be successful? Maybe not."

[email protected]
© The Edmonton Journal 2009

Copyright © 2009 CanWest Interactive, a division of CanWest MediaWorks Publications, Inc.. All rights reserved.
CanWest Interactive, a division of CanWest MediaWorks Publications, Inc.. All rights reserved.

http://www2.canada.com/components/print.aspx?id=db3d1576-ed79-48fa-8d38-8ac80bcfc258&sponsor=
     
     
  #3051  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 1:47 PM
Shodan's Avatar
Shodan Shodan is offline
Sherwood Park as a Nation
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Where I hang my hat
Posts: 2,372
Downtown tower 70% spoken for
Federal government, Epcor under lease for 19 of 28 future floors


Bill Mah
The Edmonton Journal

Thursday, February 05, 2009


CREDIT: Rick MacWilliam, The Journal
Qualico's Ken Cantor stands in front of the Epcor Tower construction site. Qualico announced Wednesday that the federal government has agreed to lease 128,000 square feet of office space in the tower.

Construction on the Epcor Tower won't reach ground level until April, but nearly 19 of its 28 future floors are already spoken for.

The federal government will lease 128,000 square feet of space in the 625,000-square-foot tower, developer Qualico announced Wednesday. Under two leases, the federal government will occupy floors three to seven and part of eight.

With utility company Epcor committed to more than 265,000 square feet on floors 16 through 28, that brings the total amount of office preleased in the new building to 70 per cent -- not including retail space.

"I'm not sure we're going to run out of space before the building actually gets completed, but we're pretty pleased to be at that 70-per-cent office-preleased level, 21/2 or three years before the building's even going to be completed," said Ken Cantor, Qualico's commercial manager.

Public Works and Government Services Canada spokesman Chris Konski said the department, which negotiated the lease, sources office space for a variety of federal ministries and it's premature to say which departments will move into the space.

"The space requirements for the Government of Canada in Edmonton are continually changing," Konski said. "In order to meet the changing demand and ensure the best possible value to Canadians, space is leased to best meet those needs. Leases expire on a continual basis; this requirement replaces existing lease space in Edmonton."

Based on the square footage, the space could accommodate 430 employees, he said.

The announcement comes as Edmonton's office market shows signs of cooling. Recent forecasts predict a drop-off in demand for new office space in 2009 as companies reign in expansion plans amid economic uncertainty.

While it's reassuring to have two major tenants on board early, Cantor said the project wasn't waiting for preleasing. "We've been hard under construction for a year now. We were comfortable with Epcor's commitment to commit to completing the building.

"Our financing's been arranged and in place since basically last summer."

Construction of the tower, at 10423 101st Street, is scheduled for completion in 2011. It's the first phase of Qualico's Station Lands project.

Construction started in May 2008. Crews are currently working in a sprawling excavated pit on the four underground parking levels and the first underground portion of the City of Edmonton's northwest light-rail transit line.

Ironically, it was also the federal government which left Qualico, and rival Edmonton bidder Gene Dub, in the lurch last November by abruptly cancelling the competition for a proposed national portrait gallery. Qualico bid for the project, offering to build a three-storey museum at Station Lands just east of Epcor Tower.

Cantor said the gallery bid and the just-announced leases are unrelated. Qualico won the leases through a different tender process through Public Works and Government Services Canada, he said.

"There was no tie at all between those things. This is an actual requirement in the marketplace, and they were open to the entire marketplace to respond," Cantor said.

"(The gallery) would have been a big thing for us, but we'll certainly find something else equally attractive for the city long-term for that portion of the project when the time comes."

The Epcor Tower is Edmonton's first new downtown office tower since Commerce Place opened in 1990.

[email protected]
© The Edmonton Journal 2009

Copyright © 2009 CanWest Interactive, a division of CanWest MediaWorks Publications, Inc.. All rights reserved.
CanWest Interactive, a division of CanWest MediaWorks Publications, Inc.. All rights reserved.

http://www2.canada.com/components/print.aspx?id=806de6ca-c908-49eb-b6cd-9644d302b7f6&sponsor=
     
     
  #3052  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 2:10 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
...and Mr. Brown regrets yet again not retrofitting to LEED Silver standards...
     
     
  #3053  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 4:44 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,151
A downtown room to let
by Lawrence Herzog
It's Our Heritage | Vol. 27 No. 5 | February 05, 2009



Armstrong building. File photo
In Edmonton’s formative years, before the popularization of the motor vehicle, many members of the workforce preferred to live near their place of employment. As many of the jobs were downtown, demand for housing grew in the districts close to the heart of the city.

The city’s early working class couldn’t easily afford to buy real estate, and so many rented rooms, apartments and modest suites. The first apartment building, the Arlington, opened in 1909 (and has now sadly been lost to a fire that has left it beyond economically feasible salvage). Others quickly followed, answering the demand for a comfortable room to let in boomtime Edmonton.

Many of those early apartment and mixed use commercial buildings have been lost to the march of time, but a few survive. Here’s a look at four of them.

Jasper Block, 10516 Jasper Avenue

This three-storey brick building was built in 1909 and 1910 and financed by John Kelly, a blacksmith who made the jump to real estate and development in the heady days of the city’s first boom of the 20th century. Constructed at the western edge of downtown in the city’s fledgling warehouse and wholesale district, the $30,000 building included commercial tenants at street level and apartments above.

It was designed by the Edmonton architectural firm of Hopkins and Wright and survives as a good example of the simple, yet pleasing commercial architecture typical of early Edmonton. While not ornate, it is enlivened by a stone nameplate set into the parapet, arcaded brick detailing just below the cornice, and stone string courses defining the three floors.

The local contracting firm of Edinger and Nesbitt was hired to build it atop a concrete foundation and with framing of steel and wood. Restoration work carried out on the building in 2003 revealed steel supports on the main floor and wood framing above.

The 30 small two-room apartments on the upper two floors provided accommodation for virtually the entire 20th century. Over the years, its three commercial storefronts have been home to ladies' wear, hat shops and restaurants, among other uses.

MacLean Block, 10702 Jasper Avenue

Built in 1909 for about $35,000 by physician and surgeon Dr. James Douglas MacLean, this three-storey block originally contained stores on the main floor, offices on the second, and “rooming apartments” on the third. It was designed by James E. Wize, and boasted the finest brickwork, with elaborate brick detailing and roundheaded arches to imitate the stone architecture of Renaissance Italy. The style is sometimes known as Victorian Italianate Renaissance.

MacLean's permit, number 155, created a big stir in the little city that was then home to barely 19,000 residents. By building a mixed use block, MacLean diversified his sources of income and diminished his risk.

Even so, there were some who wondered about the speculative venture because of its location so far west of the downtown core. But it connected the downtown with the developing government centre a few blocks to the south and history would show that MacLean was right on the money with his foresight.

The third floor remained rental apartments until 1977, when an ambitious restoration was launched, and the top two floors were rejuvenated as office space.

Lemarchand Mansion, 11523 100 Avenue

Rene Lemarchand was in his 50s when he landed in Edmonton in 1905 with his wife and three daughters to join his brother, Alphonse, who was a priest at St. Joachim’s parish. A retired butler, Rene was said to have inherited a large number of straight razors from an eccentric Parisian nobleman who used a new razor every day. In an era where straight razors were both expensive and durable, this was a sizeable legacy.

Lemarchand became a real estate speculator and, supplemented by investment funds from the waiters'union in Paris, L'Union des Garcons de Cafe, began construction of his apartment building in 1909. It was his ambition to build the most luxurious apartment in Canada. He hired renowned local architect, Alfred Merigon Calderon, to design a lavish European style building in the middle of the Canadian wilderness.

Completion was scheduled for 1910 at an estimated cost of $140,000, but a series of builders' strikes and some other circumstances delayed its opening until 1912 and pushed the final construction cost to nearly $200,000. Built to attract upper income families and singles alike, all 43 suites came with one or two fireplaces and an exterior window.

No expense was spared to offer the latest conveniences. The building boasted one of Edmonton’s first elevators, electric dumbwaiters to carry parcels and packages to upper levels, a mail chute, iron balconies and a coal degasifier that produced natural gas for cooking and heating.

Armstrong Building, 10127 104 Street

It cost the Armstrong Brothers (Reginald Wilfred Ross and Louis Herbert Smith) $88,000 to build their rectangular, four-storey block between April and December 1912 – the height of the city's pre First World War building boom. The design by David Hardy made it the first along the Warehouse Row of 104th Street to offer space for wholesale trade, offices and apartment dwelling under one roof.

The square stairwell was originally intended for an elevator, but the brothers ran out of money, so they never built the elevator. Instead, a poor man's lift – a cross beam and hook which is still atop the staircase on the fourth floor – was used for lifting furniture in and out of the building's 51 suites.

Over the years, hundreds of tenants have called the Armstrong Block 'home.' In the early days, they included Robert Tegler, the man who financed the Tegler Building (since demolished). He rented Suite 219 from 1913 to 1920.

Many stayed much longer – like Sophie Arensen, who lived in Suite 453 for 45 years. Ms. Arensen was a seamstress for Holt Renfrew and stayed at the Armstrong until she moved to Vancouver at the age of 85.

In the basement, two original steam boilers, manufactured by Robb Engineering of Amherst, Nova Scotia and stamped May 28, 1912, long provided heat. The boilers were fired with coal, shoveled in through chutes in an adjacent coal room.

The original bathrooms featured cast iron tubs and signs headlined 'Rules Toilets, Etc.' Among the dictums: 'No washing of clothes' and 'Each tenant must clean bath after use with Dutch Cleanser.' A century after the district came to life, the block remains part of a remarkable intact grouping of warehouses and commercial blocks on the western edge of downtown.

Next week: Edmonton’s 1914 Apartments

©Copyright 2000-2007, All Rights Reserved. All articles, text and photographic material presented here is copyright. Unauthorized copying or re-distribution is strictly prohibited.
     
     
  #3054  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 5:03 PM
newfangled's Avatar
newfangled newfangled is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oliver
Posts: 1,803
^ there were a couple of apartment blocks on 124st (one where Plaza 124 is across from the Glenora B&B, and another further North) that were probably part of the 1914 boom, so will hopefully be in Herzog's next article.
     
     
  #3055  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 6:18 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
According to the TNP website both Uptown and Viva City are sold out
     
     
  #3056  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 6:19 PM
kcantor kcantor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikemike View Post
I'm curious about these 'high capacity' angle parking stalls that Kerry mentions. I always thought that one angle parking stall has the same capacity as an parallel stall or a perpendicular one.

You learn something new every day.
if your street is 300 feet long, you can park about 15 cars in "parallel" stalls that are about 20' long. if you have perpendicular stalls that are 8.5' wide, you can park 35 cars in that same length. angled stalls - depending on the angle - would be somewhere in between that. it's not that you get "more cars in each stall because they don't have the same capacity", it's that you get more stalls providing you can maintain your traffic flows. that's why all of your parkades are perpendicular stalls, not parallel. they are indeed higher capacity whether off street or on.
     
     
  #3057  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 6:20 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,151
     
     
  #3058  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 6:23 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
^ I'd really like to know what those guys have up their sleeves next.

TNP, for better or worse has always been bullish on downtown Edmonton. Viva and Uptown are such polar opposites, I hope we see more of the latter, not so much more of the former.
     
     
  #3059  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 6:30 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,151
Uptown was always a TNP project whereas Vivacity was a cluster FCUK of a mess from its original owners/investors to abbey lane to TNP.

From a source close to TNP, i believe they do not have anything "up their sleeve" development wise and are of the belief we are over built and a 'bear' market for a while.

Uptown is quite nice and TNP has a good reputation for quality and speed of construction. I would really like to see them actually do a building that is modern and not a giant wall.
     
     
  #3060  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2009, 9:23 PM
GoMod's Avatar
GoMod GoMod is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 136
Two projects - same developer, so disparate in design quality and materials, but guess which one Edmonton gets?...exactly

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:07 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.