HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3001  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 5:29 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,297
Lockerbies' bread & butter has always been in the industrial heartland around Edmonton. Too bad to see a local company bought up but at least it stayed Canadian, and Aecon has roots in this city too... shows that they have confidence in our local economy.
     
     
  #3002  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 5:29 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
recent pictures of 'Quest' anyone.... anyone?
     
     
  #3003  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 5:33 PM
buk buk is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by edm17el View Post

Seriously, Troy?
     
     
  #3004  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 6:36 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
Report predicts busy 2009 for Edmonton landlords


EDMONTONJOURNAL.COMFEBRUARY 2, 2009 11:26 AMBE THE FIRST TO POST A COMMENT


EDMONTON — Landlords will be busier in 2009 — buying and selling properties and competing for tenants, predicts a new report by Avison Young.

After 2008, which saw Edmonton sales volume for apartment transactions fall by 80 per cent year-over-year, the pace will continue to be slow but pick up in the latter half of 2009, said the commercial real estate firm’s Edmonton Multi-family Market Report released Monday.

“In the first month of 2009 we are seeing a lot of interest from purchasers who are looking for great deals,” said Paul Chaput, Avison Young multi-family investment sales specialist.

“2008 was a slow year for transactions. The lack of sales activity made it difficult for investors to agree on which direction the market was going. We expect things will change in ’09 — more transactions at prices supported by the income fundamentals of the property.”

The forecast predicts “apartment prices to stabilize at lower, income-based levels but remain high by historical standards.”

There will be upward pressure on the vacancy rate but it will average no more than four or five per cent, the report predicted, while rents will rise “marginally” by another three to five per cent — except for higher-end suites competing with condo rentals.

Landlords will turn to incentives as competition increases for tenants.

© Copyright (c) The Edmonton Journal

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Report+predicts+busy+2009+Edmonton+landlords/1244833/story.html
     
     
  #3005  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 8:10 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
proposed for Hamilton but how hot would that look on the BP's lands but perhaps with 1 or 2 tower on part for some residential...

     
     
  #3006  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 8:17 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,297
^ nice, but I'd like to see some more height in that area.

That development would fit the Quarters nicely IMO
     
     
  #3007  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 8:22 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
^agreed x 2, but imagine the bottom left and right "green" spaces with say a 20 and 30 storey condo or office or hotel...
     
     
  #3008  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 8:24 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 14,028
The fore is decent, the aft looks like it belongs in a government/educational district, which this building is going to be built.
     
     
  #3009  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 8:36 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,644
Looks nice, but I wonder how much a dead zone it will create (hard to know without a wider context than just the surrounding blocks.)

It is surrounded by towers in parks, parks, and it looks like some other small street front (maybe prewar). The far side of the project is a plaza that looks to be shadow draped oh so much.

Could use a reorientation of the site (plaza to sunny side), a continuation of the road from the bottom of the picture through the site, a commitment to more CRUs (that is, if the periphery is already CRUs, or is it all dead zone bureaucratic offices).

While it looks nice, some attempts to tone down its superblock modernism would help greatly with it.
     
     
  #3010  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 10:14 PM
tony0911 tony0911 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
proposed for Hamilton but how hot would that look on the BP's lands but perhaps with 1 or 2 tower on part for some residential...

No good for Edmonton, no pink and yellow stucco, way to much glass, not enough stupid cone swirl flute overdesigned elements.
     
     
  #3011  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 10:17 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,566
just once, just once, I know tony0911 will have a positive contribution. I know it will all shock us to death... but it will happen. I swear
     
     
  #3012  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2009, 11:14 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 14,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony0911 View Post
No good for Edmonton, no pink and yellow stucco, way to much glass, not enough stupid cone swirl flute overdesigned elements.
We already have the aft section, via Robbins and other works brought to us by Cohos-Evamy.
     
     
  #3013  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2009, 3:24 PM
tallisgood's Avatar
tallisgood tallisgood is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
proposed for Hamilton but how hot would that look on the BP's lands but perhaps with 1 or 2 tower on part for some residential...


Nice. But I'd rather see that North of 104th Ave, Quarters, or on the present Muni site... that is, AFTER the Muni gets closed (crosses fingers).
     
     
  #3014  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2009, 3:33 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
^the muni site is about 100 times this size.
     
     
  #3015  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2009, 3:51 PM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,010
This was a really good article.

Plenty of giants remain

Lockerbie doesn't sting like it once would have

By Gary Lamphier, The Edmonton JournalFebruary 3, 2009 7:55 AM

Aecon Group's surprise $220-million offer to acquire Lockerbie & Hole will soon lead to the disappearance of one of the city's oldest and most respected construction firms.

No matter how you slice it, that's a loss. But this isn't the same city it was a decade ago, when the departure of local giants like Telus, Enbridge and Shaw shattered Edmonton's sense of self-confidence.

The explosive growth of the city's construction sector shows how far Edmonton has come as a corporate centre over the past decade.

Edmonton-based PCL, the country's largest builder, has morphed into a North American behemoth, with annual revenues of more than $6 billion. That's well over twice the size of Aecon and Lockerbie & Hole combined.

Churchill Corp. has also mushroomed in size. The Edmonton-based civil, commercial and industrial builder posted record results for Q3 of 2008, and its annual revenues are now in the $900-million range. That's about 50 per cent greater than Lockerbie & Hole's top line.

North American Energy Partners is another key local player that has grown at a rapid clip. The Spruce Grove-based oilsands giant boasts annual revenues of well over $1 billion, about $400 million more than Lockerbie & Hole. And then there's Clark Builders, founded by CEO Andy Clark in 1974, at the tender age of 24. When I last sat down with Clark in 2005, his firm's annual revenues had reached $250 million, quadruple the level of the mid-1990s.

Just four years later, its top line is closer to $600 million -- roughly on par with Lockerbie & Hole -- and its work backlog has swelled to $1.4 billion, even as new construction work in the oilsands has slowed to a crawl.

That's no small feat, considering the fact that Clark Builders saw a third of its work backlog disappear in the final months of 2008, when Petro-Canada delayed its massive $24-billion Fort Hills oilsands project.

"The analogy I like to use is a sports analogy. It's like we were up 5-4 with five minutes left in the game, when all the work in Fort McMurray died. Suddenly, we were losing 6-5. So what do we do?" asks company president Paul Verhesen. "Do you just accept the loss? Do you accept that this year isn't going to be as great as last year? No. You put out your best line, you dig deep and you go looking for new opportunities. And that's what we did."

Instead of spinning its wheels in the oilsands, Clark shifted its focus to government-funded infrastructure projects, where building activity -- especially in Alberta -- remains high. In the last half of 2008 it bid on five major public works projects, and won every one of them, adding roughly $900 million to its pipeline.

The lineup includes the planned $265-million restoration of the long-vacant Federal Building, in Edmonton's legislature precinct; a $170-million expansion project at Northlands; a $150-million addition at Red Deer College; a new $205-million project at NAIT's main campus; and $35-million worth of work on a new fieldhouse for the Edmonton Eskimos football club.

Clark is also working on a new $25-million sports multiplex project in Lac La Biche that could evolve into something bigger, including two new schools.

"We feel really good about our future, and about the talent, depth and reputation of our team," says Clark. "I guess the other thing is, because of our northern history (the company was born in Yellowknife) and the mobility we have corporately, we're not particularly worried.

"When things slowed down (in the last cycle), we went to Russia, China and Japan. Now we're looking at projects in the Caribbean, so we're not particularly worried about the future. It's going to get tough, but we know we'll be fine."

So how does Clark account for his firm's success? Not surprisingly, it comes down to the quality of its people.

"About 15 or 20 years ago I was at a management course and they were doing a study of Richard Branson, and Virgin Records. Richard was a guy who wore blue jeans to the office. He was a maverick, yet he was growing this tremendous business that didn't fit any of the standard MBA rules," says Clark.

"So they were interviewing one of Branson's VPs, and asking him what makes your business so different, and he says, 'Well, one of the things we do around here is we don't just hire for the best talent, we hire for the best character. The best talent comes second.'"

Clark says he realized he had already adopted the same approach, and it had paid off. So he has stuck with it ever since. "I don't think I'd ever dialed into what I was doing in my own mind, but I'd never been comfortable with conflict. So I was always trying to hire self-motivated, responsible individuals who brought their best to the office every day," he says.

"I could find no joy or value in going around and pushing people to do better. It just went against my grain. And that's helped us to build a great team."

Clark and his longtime partner, company COO Bill Giebelhaus, have been slowly reducing their stake in the firm over the years, spreading the wealth among the company's 700 to 800 full-time staff.

Currently, Clark and Giebelhaus each own 30 per cent of the firm. Senior management owns 25 per cent, and the rest of the staff owns 15 per cent. Clark says the two major shareholders will continue to reduce their holdings.

"Our motto here is one good project at a time, one good staff member at a time, and if you take care of today, tomorrow takes care of itself. It's really pretty simple stuff."

[email protected]

© Copyright (c) The Edmonton Journal
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/business/Plenty+giants+remain/1247080/story.html
     
     
  #3016  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2009, 5:15 PM
tallisgood's Avatar
tallisgood tallisgood is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^the muni site is about 100 times this size.

I'm well aware of that, thank you. I'm referring to the neighbourhoods I think would best compliment developments of this kind. It would look sweet just up Kingsway from the new AMA building (as part of a developed Muni site), or in the Quarters, or just North of 104th Ave.
     
     
  #3017  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2009, 8:06 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
Edmonton home sales down 40 per cent compared to last January

***calgary down 50%***

BY BILL MAH, EDMONTONJOURNAL.COMFEBRUARY 3, 2009 1:01 PMCOMMENTS (3)


STORYPHOTOS ( 1 )



A for sale sign is posted in front of a new homes in the Sunset Valley Estates on Ellerslie Road in Edmonton.
Photograph by: Anne-Marie Jackson, Edmonton Journal
EDMONTON — Edmonton’s resale housing market sales kicked off the new year by stumbling out the gate — with residential MLS sales down 40.5 per cent compared to January 2008.

Every indicator fared worse than it did in January of last year, showed Multiple Listing Service figures released Tuesday.

- Total MLS sales plunged 40.9 per cent.

- Value of total sales for the month was $265 million — down 42.4 per cent.

- The single-family home average selling price fell 7.1 per cent to $352,689.

- The average condo selling price dropped 7.5 per cent to $238,535.

- In the single-family market, there were 502 houses sold, down from 767 in January 2008.

- For condos, only 189 sold in January compared to 363 a year ago.

For all that, Charlie Ponde, president of the Realtors Association of Edmonton, sounded optimistic, if cautious.

He looked on the bright side, the month-by-month comparison — January figures were modestly better than December’s gloomy statistics.

Multiple Listing Service figures released Tuesday showed 730 residential properties sold in the Edmonton region in January, up from 608 in December.

Sales prices were also up in all categories as compared to the previous month. The average price of a single-family home in January was $352,689 — up a quarter of a per cent compared to December. Condo prices nudged up 1.8 per cent to $238,535 and duplex/rowhouses rose 2.2 per cent to $299,222.

“Nobody rings a bell when prices hit the bottom,” he said. “The bottom is evident only after several months of rising prices. One month does not make a trend but the market is certainly welcoming to home buyers.”

He pointed to interest rates which have fallen to their lowest in years, a large selection of homes and recently introduced federal tax credits for home renovation and a change in the amount of RRSP savings that can be applied to a first-home purchase — now $25,000 up from $20,000.

[email protected]

© Copyright (c) The Edmonton Journal

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Homes/Home+sales+down+cent/1248520/story.html
     
     
  #3018  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2009, 8:42 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,072
^ house prices actually rose a little this past month

not that I pay attention to such drivel, I just heard it on the radio.
     
     
  #3019  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2009, 10:09 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,297
So a little birdie at design company X is telling me about a new admin tower @ EIA not 5 minutes ago on the phone. Anyone know anything about that ?
     
     
  #3020  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2009, 11:00 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
^yup... old news mr.mech.

new admin + control tower
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:34 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.